Wercker had its moment. For a while, it was a solid choice for teams that wanted simple CI/CD without too much ceremony. But once it was shut down, a lot of teams were left asking the same question: what now?
If you’re searching for Wercker alternatives, chances are you want something that feels just as straightforward, without the maintenance headaches, brittle configs, or outdated assumptions. Maybe you’ve already tried a few tools and found them either too heavy or too limiting. Maybe you just want something that stays out of the way and lets you ship.
In this article, we’ll look at modern alternatives to Wercker that fit how teams actually build and deploy software today, tools that scale with your app, don’t fight your workflow, and won’t disappear overnight.
1. AppFirst
AppFirst manages delivery from the infrastructure side rather than from pipelines. Instead of requiring build and deploy steps to be manually wired together, it allows applications to be described in terms of their requirements and automatically sets up the cloud environment. Networking, security boundaries, and basic observability are provisioned by the platform without the need to write Terraform or similar tooling.
For teams coming from Wercker, this can change where CI stops and deployment begins. Rather than extending pipelines with infrastructure logic, teams rely on the platform to prepare and manage environments consistently across cloud providers. It does not replace build automation, but it can reduce the amount of work that usually follows a successful build.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Application-driven infrastructure setup
- Built-in logging, monitoring, and auditing
- Support for AWS, Azure, and GCP
- אפשרויות פריסה SaaS ופריסה עצמית
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams avoiding custom infrastructure code
- Developers responsible for services end to end
- Organizations standardizing cloud environments
פרטי קשר:
- אֲתַר אִינטֶרנֶט: www.appfirst.dev
2. TeamCity
They offer a structured CI/CD system that supports both visual configuration and configuration as code. Build chains, reusable templates, and test reporting are central parts of how pipelines are defined and maintained.
This tends to appeal to teams that want more visibility and control than lighter CI tools provide. Compared to simpler pipeline setups, it allows more complex workflows without forcing everything into custom scripts, while still supporting both cloud-hosted and on-premises environments.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Pipeline configuration through UI or code
- Build chains and reusable components
- Cloud and self-hosted deployment models
- Integration with common development tools
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams running complex build workflows
- Organizations with compliance or hosting constraints
- Developers already using JetBrains tooling
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: www.jetbrains.com
- דוא"ל: sales@jetbrains.com
- פייסבוק: www.facebook.com/JetBrains
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/jetbrains
- טוויטר: x.com/jetbrains
- אינסטגרם: www.instagram.com/jetbrains
- כתובת: Kavčí Hory Office Park, Na Hřebenech II 1718/8, Praha 4 – Nusle, 140 00, צ'כיה
3. GitHub
They combine source control and automation in one place, which changes how teams think about CI. Workflows live next to the code and run in response to repository events, making builds and deployments part of everyday development activity.
For teams moving away from a separate CI service, this setup reduces context switching. Automation becomes easier to review and version alongside application code, though it often means spending more time defining workflows in configuration files.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Repository-based CI workflows
- Automation triggered by code events
- Built-in collaboration and review tools
- Large ecosystem of shared actions
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams already hosting code there
- Projects valuing tight CI and code integration
- Distributed teams working in one workspace
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: github.com
- אינסטגרם: www.instagram.com/github
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/github
- טוויטר: x.com/github
4. Codefresh
They focus on GitOps-style delivery, particularly for Kubernetes environments. Instead of long pipelines that push changes forward, teams define promotion rules and let deployments progress through environments based on Git state.
This approach fits teams that found traditional CI pipelines growing too complex once Kubernetes entered the picture. It shifts attention away from scripting and toward managing how and when changes move between environments.
נקודות עיקריות:
- GitOps-based promotion workflows
- Built around Argo CD
- Kubernetes-first delivery model
- Support for container-based CI
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams running Kubernetes in production
- Organizations adopting GitOps practices
- Platform teams managing multiple environments
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: codefresh.io
- פייסבוק: www.facebook.com/codefresh.io
- טוויטר: x.com/codefresh
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/codefresh
5. AWS CodePipeline
They provide a managed pipeline service designed to connect AWS tools into a defined release flow. Pipelines are built from stages that link source, build, and deployment services without running separate CI servers.
This works well for teams that want fewer moving parts and are already deep in the AWS ecosystem. The tradeoff is tighter coupling to AWS services, which can limit portability compared to more platform-agnostic tools.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Fully managed pipeline service
- Native integration with AWS tools
- Event-driven execution
- Access control through AWS IAM
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams operating fully on AWS
- Projects needing simple managed pipelines
- Organizations standardizing on AWS services
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: aws.amazon.com
- פייסבוק: www.facebook.com/amazonwebservices
- טוויטר: x.com/awscloud
- לינקדאין: www.linkedin.com/company/amazon-web-services
- אינסטגרם: www.instagram.com/amazonwebservices
6. Argo CD
They maintain a collection of open source tools for running workflows and managing delivery inside Kubernetes. Instead of a single CI product, teams combine components for workflows, deployments, rollouts, and event handling.
This setup suits teams that want deep control over delivery behavior inside clusters. It requires more Kubernetes knowledge, but it allows pipelines and deployments to be expressed in a declarative, modular way.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Kubernetes-native workflow and delivery tools
- Declarative configuration model
- Support for canary and blue-green deployments
- Open source and community-driven
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Kubernetes-focused engineering teams
- Teams building custom delivery systems
- Organizations comfortable with open source tools
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: argoproj.github.io
7. GitLab
They provide a single platform that combines source control, CI/CD, and security workflows. Pipelines are defined alongside code and run through a unified interface that covers build, test, and deployment stages.
This appeals to teams looking to reduce the number of separate systems they manage. While the platform covers many areas, some teams may find it heavier than tools focused only on CI.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Built-in CI/CD tied to repositories
- Unified workflows from commit to deploy
- Integrated security features
- Cloud and self-hosted options
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams wanting one DevOps platform
- Organizations managing CI and security together
- Projects needing end-to-end visibility
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: about.gitlab.com
- פייסבוק: www.facebook.com/gitlab
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/gitlab-com
- טוויטר: x.com/gitlab
8. CircleCI
They provide a hosted CI/CD platform where pipelines are defined through configuration files and run in managed environments. Builds, tests, and deployments can be triggered by changes in connected repositories, with support for many languages, frameworks, and cloud providers.
Teams coming from Wercker often look at this option when they want to keep CI focused on automation rather than infrastructure management. The service handles execution environments and scaling, which reduces the need to maintain build servers, while still allowing fairly detailed control over workflows.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Hosted CI/CD with configurable pipelines
- Support for many languages and deployment targets
- Integrations with common code hosting platforms
- Managed execution environments
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams wanting hosted CI without running servers
- Projects with varied tech stacks
- Groups that prefer configuration-based pipelines
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: circleci.com
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/circleci
- טוויטר: x.com/circleci
9. טקטון
They offer an open source framework for building CI/CD systems on Kubernetes. Instead of a ready-made service, they provide building blocks like tasks and pipelines that teams can assemble to match their workflows.
This approach fits teams that outgrew simpler CI tools and want more control over how builds and deployments run. Compared to Wercker-style hosted tools, this requires more setup and Kubernetes knowledge, but it allows workflows to stay portable across environments.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Kubernetes-native CI/CD components
- Declarative pipeline definitions
- Cloud and on-premise support
- Open source and vendor-neutral
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams already using Kubernetes
- Engineers building custom CI systems
- Organizations avoiding managed CI services
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: tekton.dev
10. Codeship
They provide a CI/CD service that focuses on getting pipelines running quickly while still allowing teams to grow into more advanced setups. Pipelines can start with a guided interface and later move toward configuration-based control.
For teams replacing Wercker, this can feel familiar in terms of hosted execution and repository-driven builds. It keeps CI centralized while letting developers choose how much control they need over environments and steps.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Hosted CI/CD service
- Guided setup with optional configuration as code
- Broad integration support
- Cloud-based execution
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Small and growing engineering teams
- Projects moving from simple to more complex pipelines
- Teams preferring a managed CI service
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: www.cloudbees.com
- פייסבוק: www.facebook.com/cloudbees
- טוויטר: x.com/cloudbees
- לינקדאין: www.linkedin.com/company/cloudbees
- אינסטגרם: www.instagram.com/cloudbees_inc
- כתובת: Faubourg de l’Hôpital 18 CH-2000 Neuchâtel שווייץ
11. Razorops
They focus on container-based CI/CD with an emphasis on cloud-agnostic workflows. Pipelines are designed to move code from build to deployment with minimal setup, using containers as the main execution unit.
This option is often considered when teams want something lighter than large CI platforms but more structured than homegrown scripts. It keeps CI logic relatively simple while supporting modern deployment patterns.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Container-native pipeline execution
- Cloud-agnostic deployment support
- Simple pipeline configuration
- Hosted CI/CD platform
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams adopting container workflows
- Projects needing quick CI setup
- Groups avoiding heavy CI systems
פרטי קשר:
- Website: razorops.com
- Email: support@razorops.com
- Facebook: www.facebook.com/razorops
- Twitter: x.com/razorops
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/razorops
- Instagram: www.instagram.com/razoropscicd
- Address: 5208 Cumberland Dr, Roseville, United States
- Phone: +1 (916) 272 8503
12. Jenkins
They maintain an open source automation server that can be used for CI, CD, or broader automation tasks. Functionality is extended through plugins, allowing teams to connect almost any tool or service.
Compared to Wercker-style hosted tools, this setup shifts responsibility to the team. It offers flexibility and control, but it also means handling upgrades, plugins, and infrastructure that runs the builds.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Open source automation server
- Large plugin ecosystem
- Self-hosted and highly configurable
- Supports distributed builds
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams needing full control over CI
- Organizations with existing Jenkins experience
- Projects requiring custom integrations
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: www.jenkins.io
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/jenkins-project
- טוויטר: x.com/jenkinsci
13. Harness
They offer a delivery platform that covers CI, CD, and environment management. Pipelines can be defined through configuration or UI, with support for different deployment strategies and infrastructure types.
This can work for teams moving beyond basic CI and looking to manage deployments more explicitly. Compared to simpler Wercker-style workflows, it introduces more structure around environments and releases.
נקודות עיקריות:
- CI and CD capabilities in one platform
- Support for multiple deployment strategies
- Environment and release management
- Cloud and self-hosted options
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams formalizing deployment workflows
- Organizations managing multiple environments
- Projects needing structured delivery processes
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: www.harness.io
- פייסבוק: www.facebook.com/harnessinc
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/harnessinc
- טוויטר: x.com/harnessio
- אינסטגרם: www.instagram.com/harness.io
14. Buddy
They provide a CI/CD platform with a strong focus on ease of use. Pipelines can be created through a visual interface or configuration files, and deployments can target many types of infrastructure.
For teams coming from Wercker, this can feel approachable while still covering common CI needs. It supports both simple automation and more detailed workflows without requiring much setup upfront.
נקודות עיקריות:
- Visual and configuration-based pipelines
- Support for many deployment targets
- Built-in environment management
- Cloud and self-hosted options
למי זה מתאים ביותר:
- Teams wanting an easy-to-use CI tool
- Projects with mixed deployment targets
- Developers preferring visual pipeline setup
פרטי קשר:
- אתר אינטרנט: buddy.works
- טוויטר: x.com/useBuddy
מַסְקָנָה
When Wercker went away, it didn’t just leave a gap in tooling. It nudged teams into asking questions they hadn’t really needed to ask before. Do we still want a hosted CI that just runs pipelines? Do we want more control, or less? Do we even need the same shape of workflow anymore?
Looking at the alternatives, it’s clear there isn’t a clean replacement that fits everyone. Some tools lean toward convenience and managed setups. Others assume you’re comfortable owning more of the system, especially if Kubernetes is already part of daily work. A few stretch beyond CI entirely and start blending builds, deployments, and environments into one flow. None of these paths are wrong, but they do lead to very different day-to-day experiences.
If Wercker worked well for your team, that probably means you valued calm, predictable pipelines more than endless customization. That’s worth protecting. If it started to feel boxed in, this is a chance to pick something that matches how your team actually works now, not how it worked years ago. In the end, moving on from Wercker is less about finding a substitute and more about choosing what kind of friction you’re willing to live with.
