CFEngine has been around for a long time and for good reason. It’s fast, efficient, and built on solid ideas that helped shape configuration management as we know it. But the way teams build and run infrastructure has changed. Cloud environments are more dynamic, teams move faster, and expectations around usability and visibility are much higher than they used to be.
For many teams today, CFEngine can feel powerful but heavy. The learning curve is steep, workflows can feel dated, and integrating it cleanly into modern CI/CD pipelines isn’t always straightforward. That’s usually the moment when teams start asking the same question: what else is out there?
In this article, we’ll look at popular CFEngine alternatives that better match modern infrastructure needs, tools that prioritize clarity, automation, and flexibility without adding unnecessary complexity.
1. AppFirst
AppFirst focuses on running applications with minimal operational friction rather than on managing servers directly. The platform allows applications to be defined by their requirements instead of prescribing how infrastructure should be built. CPU, networking, databases, and container images are specified at a high level, while the underlying cloud setup is automatically provisioned across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
By abstracting most infrastructure details, it reduces the need for traditional configuration tools such as CFEngine in environments where direct system-level control is no longer a priority. Logging, monitoring, auditing, and cost tracking are included from the start, shifting infrastructure consistency away from OS-level policies toward standardized application environments.
Faits marquants :
- Infrastructure defined from the application’s perspective
- Automatic provisioning across major cloud platforms
- Built-in logging, monitoring, and audit trails
- Visibilité des coûts par application et par environnement
- Options de déploiement SaaS et auto-hébergées
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Product teams focused on application delivery
- Developers without time for infrastructure setup
- Organizations standardizing cloud environments with minimal tooling
Informations de contact :
- Site web : www.appfirst.dev
2. Red Hat
Red Hat offers Ansible Automation Platform as part of its broader enterprise open source portfolio. The platform provides agentless automation using playbooks written in YAML, covering configuration management, orchestration, and operational tasks across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. As a CFEngine alternative, it approaches configuration through task-based automation rather than continuous policy enforcement.
Instead of enforcing system state through long-running agents, automation is typically executed on demand or through scheduled workflows. This can suit environments where infrastructure changes are more event-driven. The platform integrates with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, OpenShift, and major cloud providers, making it useful in mixed environments that already rely on Red Hat tools.
Faits marquants :
- Agentless automation using YAML playbooks
- Works across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid setups
- Covers configuration, orchestration, and operational tasks
- Integrates with other Red Hat platforms
- Designed around open source automation practices
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Teams already using Red Hat infrastructure
- Environments favoring agentless automation
- Organizations managing mixed operating systems and platforms
Informations de contact :
- Site web : www.redhat.com
- Courriel : apac@redhat.com
- Facebook : www.facebook.com/RedHat
- Twitter : x.com/RedHat
- LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat
- Téléphone : +1 919 754 3700
3. Rudder
When configuration management is closely tied to security and compliance, this platform offers a more policy-driven approach. Systems are continuously checked against defined rules, and deviations are corrected automatically, which aligns closely with how CFEngine operates.
In addition to configuration enforcement, it also covers patching, vulnerability management, and compliance reporting. Real-time visibility into system state makes it easier to understand where issues come from and how widespread they are. This makes it a useful alternative in environments where long-term consistency and audit readiness are more important than deployment speed.
Faits marquants :
- Continuous configuration enforcement
- Security and compliance built into configuration workflows
- Supports Linux and Windows systems
- Centralized view of system state
- Designed for hybrid and on-prem setups
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Security-conscious infrastructure teams
- Organizations with strict compliance needs
- Environments managing long-lived systems
Informations de contact :
- Website: www.rudder.io
- Twitter: x.com/rudderio
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/rudderbynormation
- Address: 226 boulevard Voltaire, 75011 Paris, France
- Phone: +33 1 83 62 26 96
4. Azure Automation
In Microsoft-centered environments, configuration management is often part of a broader automation story. This service combines configuration control, update management, and runbook automation into a single cloud-based offering. Instead of acting as a standalone configuration engine, it works closely with Azure services and monitoring tools.
It can reduce reliance on tools like CFEngine by handling configuration updates and operational tasks directly within the cloud platform. While it is less flexible outside the Microsoft ecosystem, it fits well when configuration management is tightly coupled with cloud operations and hybrid automation.
Faits marquants :
- Configuration and update management for Windows and Linux
- Automation using PowerShell and Python runbooks
- Integration with Azure monitoring and services
- Hybrid automation support
- Serverless execution model
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Azure-first infrastructure teams
- Hybrid environments tied to Microsoft tooling
- Organizations automating cloud operations alongside configuration
Informations de contact :
- Site web : azure.microsoft.com
- Téléphone : (800) 642 7676
5. Chef Infra
Policy-based configuration management is at the core of this system. Desired state is defined in code, tested, and then enforced continuously by agents running on managed systems. This model is conceptually close to CFEngine and is designed to handle configuration drift over time rather than one-off changes.
It supports a wide range of operating systems and environments, including cloud, on-premises, and edge devices. Built-in testing tools allow teams to validate changes before rollout, which helps reduce risk. Compared to CFEngine, workflows tend to emphasize test-driven changes and controlled policy updates.
Faits marquants :
- Policy-based configuration defined as code
- Continuous enforcement to prevent drift
- Supports diverse systems and environments
- Integrated testing and validation tools
- Designed for large-scale infrastructure
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Teams managing complex system fleets
- Organizations practicing test-driven infrastructure
- Environments requiring strict configuration control
Informations de contact :
- Site web : www.chef.io
- Facebook : www.facebook.com/getchefdotcom
- Twitter : x.com/chef
- LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/chef-software
- Instagram : www.instagram.com/chef_software
6. Puppet
Puppet is built around desired-state configuration management. Systems are continuously evaluated against defined policies, and changes are applied automatically when drift occurs. This model is close to how CFEngine approaches long-running infrastructure.
The platform is used to manage servers, cloud resources, networks, and edge systems through centralized policies. Configuration, compliance, and change tracking are handled in one place, which suits environments where infrastructure is expected to remain stable over long periods rather than being frequently replaced.
Faits marquants :
- Desired-state configuration enforcement
- Continuous drift detection and correction
- Centralized policy management
- Supports servers, cloud, and edge systems
- Built-in auditing and change tracking
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Teams managing persistent infrastructure
- Organizations with compliance and governance needs
- Environments where configuration drift must be controlled
Informations de contact :
- Site web : www.puppet.com
- Email: sales-request@perforce.com
- Adresse : 400 First Avenue North #400 Minneapolis, MN 55401
- Téléphone : +1 612.517.2100
7. BladeLogic
BladeLogic is an automation platform that focuses on managing servers and networks at scale. It has traditionally been used to automate operational tasks and enforce consistency across complex infrastructures, especially in enterprise environments.
The tooling emphasizes centralized control over system changes and automation workflows. For teams moving away from CFEngine but still operating large numbers of servers, it offers a structured way to manage configuration and operational tasks without relying on lightweight or developer-focused tools.
Faits marquants :
- Server and network automation
- Centralized operational control
- Designed for large infrastructures
- Focus on consistency and repeatability
- Supports on-prem and cloud systems
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Large enterprise IT teams
- Environments with complex server estates
- Organizations needing centralized automation
Informations de contact :
- Website: www.helixops.ai
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/bmchelix
8. Firefly
Firefly focuses on cloud infrastructure visibility and automation through infrastructure as code. Rather than enforcing configuration on individual systems, it discovers existing cloud resources and converts them into version-controlled definitions.
This approach can reduce reliance on CFEngine by handling drift, change tracking, and recovery at the infrastructure level. Configuration consistency is maintained through codified resources and policy checks instead of continuous enforcement on hosts.
Faits marquants :
- Cloud resource discovery and inventory
- Infrastructure converted into version-controlled code
- Drift detection and change tracking
- Focus on cloud and multi-cloud environments
- Supports recovery and audit workflows
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Platform teams managing cloud infrastructure
- Environments standardizing on IaC
- Organizations needing visibility into existing resources
Informations de contact :
- Website: www.firefly.ai
- Email: contact@firefly.ai
- Twitter: x.com/fireflydotai
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/fireflyai
- Address: 8 Sderot Sha’ul HaMelech, Tel Aviv-Yafo
9. Salt
Salt is an open source automation and configuration platform maintained by VMware. It supports configuration management, remote execution, and orchestration using a data-driven model. Systems can be managed through defined states or controlled in real time.
Compared to CFEngine, it is often chosen for its speed and flexibility. Teams can apply configuration continuously or run targeted commands across large system fleets. This makes it useful in environments where both enforcement and immediate control are needed.
Faits marquants :
- Configuration management and remote execution
- State-based and real-time control
- Data-driven orchestration model
- Scales across large infrastructures
- Open source with active development
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Teams managing many systems at once
- Environments needing fast execution
- Organizations wanting flexible automation control
Informations de contact :
- Website: saltproject.io
- Facebook: www.facebook.com/SaltProjectOSS
- Twitter: x.com/Salt_Project_OS
- LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/saltproject
- Instagram: www.instagram.com/saltproject_oss
10. Foreman
Foreman is often considered by teams looking beyond CFEngine, especially when provisioning and ongoing system organization matter as much as configuration itself. Compared to CFEngine, it is usually chosen for environments where servers need to be created, grouped, and tracked from day one, not just kept in a desired state. They focus on managing the full lifecycle of physical, virtual, and cloud systems from a single place.
For configuration work, they act as a central layer on top of tools like Puppet and Salt rather than introducing their own policy language. This can make them a useful alternative for teams that want clearer structure, reporting, and visibility without writing low-level policies. Host groups, parameters, and reports are used to keep systems consistent and understandable over time.
Faits marquants :
- Manages servers from provisioning through ongoing operations
- Works with physical, virtual, and cloud environments
- Integrates with Puppet and Salt
- Uses host groups and parameters to manage systems at scale
- Provides reporting and audit visibility
- Supports both UI and command-line access
Pour qui c'est le mieux :
- Teams managing mixed infrastructure
- Environments already using Puppet or Salt
- Administrators who want visibility over policy logic
- Setups where provisioning and configuration are tightly linked
Informations de contact :
- Website: theforeman.org
Conclusion
Looking at CFEngine alternatives side by side makes one thing pretty clear – there is no single path teams are following anymore. Some still want strict, continuous control over system state. Others are comfortable moving that responsibility earlier into pipelines, images, or infrastructure definitions and letting servers stay mostly hands-off once they are running.
What really matters is how and where configuration decisions are made. Tools built around desired state, task automation, containers, CI pipelines, or infrastructure as code all solve parts of the same problem, just at different stages. Choosing an alternative to CFEngine is less about finding a like-for-like replacement and more about matching a tool to how your infrastructure actually behaves day to day.
For teams rethinking their setup, this is usually a good moment to step back and ask a few honest questions. Are systems long-lived or frequently rebuilt? Do changes happen manually, through pipelines, or through code reviews? Is configuration something that needs constant correction, or something that can be locked in earlier and left alone? The answers tend to point toward the right direction faster than any feature list ever could.
