Best Graylog Alternatives: Top Log Management Picks

Hey, if you’re knee-deep in logs and feeling like Graylog’s setup is more puzzle than powerhouse, you’re not alone. I’ve been there-chasing down configs, tweaking pipelines, and wondering why something as crucial as log management feels like a full-time job. The good news? In 2025, there are some seriously solid alternatives out there from leading companies that make the whole thing smoother, faster, and less of a headache. Whether you’re after open-source flexibility, cloud-native speed, or full-on observability stacks, these tools let you focus on what matters: keeping your systems humming without the endless infra tweaks. Let’s dive into the top ones that devs and ops teams are raving about right now.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst operates as a platform where developers specify application needs, and the system takes care of provisioning infrastructure across different clouds. It includes logging, monitoring, and alerting right from the start, along with options for centralized auditing of changes and visibility into costs per app and environment. Deployment comes in SaaS or self-hosted flavors, working with AWS, Azure, and GCP without requiring custom code for setup like Terraform or YAML.

The focus stays on letting developers handle apps end-to-end, skipping the usual DevOps hurdles. Security standards come built-in, and the setup enforces cloud best practices automatically. It’s designed for teams that want to provision resources quickly, with features for compute, databases, messaging, networking, and secrets management. Overall, it aims to cut down on overhead by abstracting away the infrastructure details.

Faits marquants :

  • Built-in logging, monitoring, and alerting for applications
  • Audit centralisé des modifications apportées à l'infrastructure
  • Cost visibility broken down by app and environment
  • Prise en charge de AWS, Azure et GCP
  • SaaS or self-hosted deployment
  • Includes security standards by default

Pour :

  • Reduces need for infrastructure code or custom tooling
  • Allows developers to own apps without DevOps involvement
  • Provides multi-cloud flexibility
  • Offers transparent audit logs for changes

Cons :

  • Relies on abstraction which might limit fine-grained control for advanced users
  • No public pricing details available
  • Primarily geared toward app provisioning rather than deep log analytics

Informations de contact :

2. Sematext

Sematext Cloud brings together logs, metrics, and traces into a single view for full-stack observability. It handles log analysis and unifies Docker logs, events, and metrics, with synthetic monitoring for uptime, user interactions, SSL certificates, and network timings. The platform supports real-time monitoring across various environments and integrates with many tools, turning data into insights for performance and costs.

Users can track changes through an audit trail for alerts, dashboards, and access, and it works for teams dealing with modern stacks. Pricing follows a pay-as-you-use model with customizable plans, including a 14-day free trial that requires no credit card. Excess data gets rejected based on set limits to avoid unexpected charges, and paid versions include full access to observability features like integrations and advanced analytics.

Faits marquants :

  • Unifies logs, metrics, and traces in one platform
  • Synthetic monitoring for uptime and performance checks
  • Audit trail for tracking changes to configurations
  • Over 100 integrations with various tools
  • Pay-as-you-use pricing with data volume limits
  • 14-day free trial available

Pour :

  • Combines multiple observability aspects without separate tools
  • Helps detect issues faster through unified views
  • Predictable costs with no overage fees
  • Free trial lets users test without commitment

Cons :

  • Cloud-based only, no self-hosted option mentioned
  • Focus on volume limits might constrain heavy users
  • Requires setup for integrations to maximize value

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : sematext.com
  • Téléphone : +1 347-480-1610
  • Courriel : info@sematext.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/sematext-international-llc
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Sematext
  • Twitter : x.com/sematext

3. Splunk

Splunk functions as an AI-native platform for security and observability, ingesting logs, metrics, traces, and events from diverse sources like clouds or on-premises setups. It supports real-time insights and manages data lifecycles, with tools for threat detection, investigation, and response powered by AI. Monitoring covers environments, stacks, and networks, optimizing based on impact and reducing alert noise through correlation.

The system includes application performance monitoring and IT service intelligence for anomaly detection and proactive fixes. Deployment works across AWS, Azure, GCP, private clouds, or on-site, with over 2000 integrations via a marketplace. AI features enable natural language queries and workflow automation, focusing on troubleshooting and model building for operational data.

Faits marquants :

  • Ingests logs, metrics, traces from any source
  • AI for threat detection and response
  • Monitors across clouds and on-premises
  • Reduces alert noise with event correlation
  • Supports OpenTelemetry and agents
  • Marketplace with many integrations

Pour :

  • Handles complex, multi-source data unification
  • Speeds up detection and resolution with AI
  • Flexible deployment in various environments
  • Extensible with custom apps and add-ons

Cons :

  • Can feel overwhelming for simple log needs
  • No pricing transparency on the site
  • Heavy reliance on integrations for full coverage
  • AI features might require learning curve

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.splunk.com
  • Téléphone : 1 866.438.7758 1 866.438.7758
  • Courriel : info@splunk.com
  • Adresse : 3098 Olsen Drive San Jose, California 95128
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/splunk
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/splunk
  • Twitter : x.com/splunk
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/splunk

Datadog

4. Datadog

Datadog delivers an observability and security platform that pulls in logs, metrics, traces, and events from pretty much any source. It covers infrastructure, applications, networks, databases, and serverless setups, with extras like real-time user monitoring, synthetic tests, and cloud cost tracking. The whole thing runs in the cloud and leans hard into AI for anomaly detection, alert noise reduction, and incident handling.

Users get a unified view across stacks, plus tools for workflow automation and bits of AI assistance. Deployment stays fully hosted, with a marketplace for integrations and add-ons. Pricing details stay behind a contact form, though a limited free tier exists for basic use.

Faits marquants :

  • Handles logs, metrics, traces, and events in one place
  • Includes synthetic monitoring and real user monitoring
  • Offers cloud cost management features
  • Provides AI-driven insights and incident tools
  • Supports OpenTelemetry natively
  • Marketplace for extensions and integrations

Pour :

  • Covers a wide range of monitoring needs without separate tools
  • Strong integration library saves setup time
  • AI features help cut through alert fatigue
  • Works across cloud and on-premises environments

Cons :

  • Pricing requires direct contact for details
  • Can get complex when enabling many features
  • Heavy use might push costs up quickly
  • Learning curve for less experienced users

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.datadoghq.com
  • Téléphone : 866 329-4466
  • Courriel : info@datadoghq.com
  • Adresse : 620 8th Ave 45th Floor, New York, NY 10018
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/datadog
  • Twitter : x.com/datadoghq
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/datadoghq
  • App Store : apps.apple.com/app/datadog/id1391380318
  • Google Play : play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.datadog.app

5. Grafana

Grafana centers around visualization and brings metrics, logs, traces, and profiles together into dashboards. Grafana Cloud handles the hosting part, while the open-source version lets users run it themselves. It connects to hundreds of data sources and includes managed backends like Mimir for metrics, Loki for logs, and Tempo for traces.

The cloud offering comes with a generous free tier that covers decent amounts of data and includes enterprise plugins. Paid plans unlock higher limits and extra features like incident management and on-call tools. Users often pair it with Prometheus or OpenTelemetry setups.

Faits marquants :

  • Dashboards for metrics, logs, traces, and profiles
  • Managed backends in the cloud version
  • Free tier with solid data allowances
  • Synthetic monitoring and performance testing options
  • Incident response and alerting tools
  • Works with Prometheus, OpenTelemetry, and many others

Pour :

  • Flexible visualization that fits most data sources
  • Free tier works well for smaller setups
  • Open-source core gives deployment choices
  • Easy to extend with plugins

Cons :

  • Users usually need separate storage backends
  • Full observability requires combining multiple components
  • Advanced features move to paid plans
  • Dashboard creation takes some practice

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : grafana.com
  • Courriel : info@grafana.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/grafana-labs
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/grafana
  • Twitter : x.com/grafana

6. Papertrail

Papertrail offers cloud-hosted log management that gathers syslog and text logs from servers, apps, and devices into one searchable place. It provides real-time tailing, search across archives, and basic alerting on patterns. Setup usually takes minutes since it accepts logs over standard protocols.

A free plan handles small volumes with limited retention, while paid plans start low and scale with usage. The 30-day trial gives full access to paid features. It works well as a lightweight addition to existing tools rather than a complete observability suite.

Faits marquants :

  • Cloud-based syslog and text log aggregation
  • Real-time search and tailing
  • Basic pattern-based alerts
  • Archives with longer retention on paid plans
  • Free plan for low-volume use
  • 30-day full-featured trial

Pour :

  • Quick to set up and start sending logs
  • Simple interface for everyday searches
  • Free tier covers basic needs
  • Works with existing syslog setups

Cons :

  • Limited to logs only, no metrics or traces
  • Advanced analysis stays basic
  • Retention and volume caps on lower plans
  • Owned by SolarWinds, which carries past baggage

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.papertrail.com
  • Téléphone : +1-866-530-8040
  • Courriel : sales@solarwinds.com
  • Adresse : 7171 Southwest Parkway Bldg 400 Austin, Texas 78735
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/solarwinds
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/SolarWinds
  • Twitter: x.com/papertrailapp
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/solarwindsinc

7. Loggly

Loggly runs as a cloud-hosted service that pulls in logs from pretty much any source without needing special agents. It handles everything from aggregation to fast search across large volumes, with built-in parsing that breaks events into fields for easier querying. Users get dashboards, charts, and alerts based on patterns or thresholds, all through a web interface that keeps things straightforward.

The platform stays fully managed in the cloud, so no servers to run. A free trial lets people test the full setup before picking a paid plan, which scales with log volume and retention needs. It works well for teams already sending syslog or text logs and wanting quick visibility without much setup fuss.

Faits marquants :

  • Accepts logs from dozens of sources without agents
  • Fast search and automatic event parsing
  • Built-in dashboards and charting
  • Pattern-based alerts
  • Fully cloud-hosted
  • Essai gratuit disponible

Pour :

  • Gets up and running fast
  • Handles high volumes without local storage worries
  • Simple sharing of saved searches and dashboards
  • Good for basic log consolidation

Cons :

  • Retention and volume limits depend on plan
  • Advanced analytics stay fairly basic
  • No on-premises option
  • Part of SolarWinds family

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.loggly.com
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/loggly
  • Twitter: x.com/loggly

8. Logmanager

Logmanager offers a platform that combines log management with SIEM capabilities in one interface. It started as an in-house fix for complicated tools and grew into a product that handles collection, storage, analysis, and security event monitoring. Deployment can be on-premises or in the cloud, depending on what users prefer.

The system focuses on keeping things simple while covering compliance reports, correlation rules, and long-term archiving. Pricing stays behind a contact form, but a demo or trial is usually available. It suits environments that need both operational logs and security oversight without juggling separate tools.

Faits marquants :

  • Combines log management and SIEM features
  • On-premises or cloud deployment
  • Built-in compliance reporting
  • Event correlation rules
  • Long-term log archiving
  • Single interface for everything

Pour :

  • Reduces tool sprawl for ops and security
  • Flexible deployment choices
  • Straightforward interface for daily use
  • Covers regulatory needs out of the box

Cons :

  • Smaller community compared to open-source options
  • Pricing details require contact
  • Less public documentation
  • Might feel niche outside Europe

Informations de contact :

  • Website: logmanager.com
  • Email: support@logmanager.com
  • Address: Zubateho 295/5, 150 00 Praha 5
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/logmanager

9. Elastic

Elastic builds on Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats, and Logstash to create a full search and analytics stack. People use it for logging, metrics, security events, or any data that needs fast search and visualization. The core stays open source, while Elastic Cloud offers a managed version with extra features like machine learning and security tools.

Users can run it themselves or let Elastic host everything. A free trial exists for the cloud service, and the self-hosted path costs nothing for basic use. It scales from small setups to huge clusters and works with almost any data format.

Faits marquants :

  • Elasticsearch for storage and search
  • Kibana for dashboards and visualization
  • Beats and Logstash for data collection
  • Machine learning and security features available
  • Self-hosted or managed cloud
  • Free core with paid add-ons

Pour :

  • Extremely flexible for any data type
  • Huge ecosystem and community
  • Powerful full-text search
  • Scales horizontally with ease

Cons :

  • Self-hosted version needs tuning and upkeep
  • Resource-heavy on large clusters
  • Paid features locked behind license
  • Steep learning curve for advanced use

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.elastic.co
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/elastic-co
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/elastic.co
  • Twitter : x.com/elastic

10. Fluentd

Fluentd acts as an open-source log collector that sits between data sources and storage backends. It uses a plugin system to connect hundreds of inputs and outputs, keeping the core light while handling buffering, routing, and basic parsing. Companies run it on servers or in containers to forward logs to places like Elasticsearch, S3, or databases.

Everything stays free under Apache license, and the project lives under CNCF. Configuration happens through text files, and reliability comes from built-in retry and buffer options. It fits well in Kubernetes or any setup that already uses multiple logging tools.

Faits marquants :

  • Unified logging layer with plugins
  • Buffering and retry mechanisms
  • Lightweight core footprint
  • Works with containers and servers
  • Fully open source
  • CNCF graduated project

Pour :

  • No licensing cost ever
  • Connects almost anything to anything
  • Reliable delivery with buffers
  • Active plugin ecosystem

Cons :

  • Only collects and forwards, no built-in search
  • Configuration can get messy at scale
  • Needs separate storage and UI
  • Debugging plugin issues takes time

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.fluentd.org
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/pages/Fluentd/196064987183037
  • Twitter : x.com/fluentd

11. Logz.io

Logz.io runs a cloud observability platform built on top of open-source tools like ELK and Grafana, but fully managed. It pulls together logs, metrics, and traces into one place, adds some AI for root cause suggestions and automated insights, and keeps the interface familiar to anyone who has used Kibana before. Users drop in their data, and the system handles scaling, updates, and storage without much hands-on work.

The service stays completely hosted, with a free trial that gives full access for a limited period. Paid plans scale by ingested volume and retention length. It works for teams that like the open-source stack but do not want to run clusters themselves.

Faits marquants :

  • Managed ELK and Grafana stack
  • Combines logs, metrics, and traces
  • AI-driven issue suggestions
  • Cloud-only deployment
  • Interface familière de type Kibana
  • Essai gratuit disponible

Pour :

  • No need to manage Elasticsearch clusters
  • Keeps the open-source feel with less ops work
  • Unified view across telemetry types
  • Easy migration path from self-hosted ELK

Cons :

  • Still tied to Elasticsearch pricing curves at large scale
  • Less control than running it yourself
  • AI features limited to higher plans
  • Cloud-only, no on-prem option

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : logz.io
  • Courriel : sales@logz.io
  • Adresse : 77 Sleeper St, Boston, MA 02210, USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/logz-io
  • Twitter : x.com/logzio

12. OpenObserve

OpenObserve delivers an open-source observability platform designed from scratch for logs, metrics, traces, and profiles. It focuses on keeping storage costs low while still offering fast search and dashboards, using a columnar format and object storage under the hood. Users can run it on Kubernetes or bare metal, or use the managed cloud version.

Everything stays free for self-hosted use, while the cloud edition has a free tier and paid plans based on usage. The project moves fast and targets teams that find traditional ELK setups too heavy or expensive.

Faits marquants :

  • Handles logs, traces, metrics, and profiles
  • Columnar storage for lower costs
  • Self-hosted or managed cloud
  • Open-source core
  • Built-in dashboarding
  • Free tier in cloud version

Pour :

  • Much cheaper storage than Elasticsearch-based tools
  • Déploiement d'un binaire unique ou d'un conteneur
  • Good performance on object storage
  • No vendor lock-in on self-hosted

Cons :

  • Younger project, smaller community
  • Fewer third-party integrations so far
  • Some features still catching up
  • Documentation can lag behind releases

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : openobserve.ai
  • Adresse : 3000 Sand Hill Rd Building 1, Suite 260, Menlo Park, CA 94025
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/openobserve
  • Twitter : x.com/OpenObserve

13. Exabeam

Exabeam concentrates on security analytics and SIEM replacement with heavy use of behavioral modeling. It ingests logs, builds user and entity baselines, then flags deviations with AI-driven risk scoring. The platform also automates parts of investigation and response workflows.

Deployment happens in the cloud as a managed service. Pricing and trials require a demo request. It fits environments that already have basic log collection and want the next layer of threat detection on top.

Faits marquants :

  • Behavioral UEBA analytics
  • Automated investigation workflows
  • Risk scoring for users and devices
  • Cloud-hosted SIEM alternative
  • Insider threat focus
  • Timeline-based case view

Pour :

  • Strong on user and entity behavior
  • Cuts down alert fatigue with scoring
  • Automates routine investigation steps
  • Clean incident timelines

Cons :

  • Needs decent log ingestion to build baselines
  • Not a general-purpose log management tool
  • Pricing stays opaque without sales contact
  • Less flexible for non-security use cases

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.exabeam.com
  • Phone: 1.844.392.2326
  • Email: info@exabeam.com
  • Address: 385 Interlocken Crescent Suite 1050 Broomfield, CO 80021
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/exabeam
  • Twitter : x.com/exabeam
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/exabeam

14. DNIF HYPERCLOUD

DNIF HYPERCLOUD works as a cloud SIEM and log platform that tries to keep costs predictable even with high volumes. It stores data in a way that avoids rehydration delays and offers instant access to older events. The system links related alerts into threat campaigns and includes user behavior analytics.

Everything runs managed in the cloud. Access starts after contacting sales for a demo or trial. It appeals to organizations frustrated with traditional SIEM pricing at scale.

Faits marquants :

  • Flat storage approach for long retention
  • No rehydration waits for old data
  • Threat campaign correlation
  • Analyse du comportement des utilisateurs
  • Cloud-only deployment
  • Automation for SOC workflows

Pour :

  • Keeps older data instantly searchable
  • Lower cost per ingested volume
  • Groups alerts into campaigns
  • Reduces manual correlation work

Cons :

  • Smaller footprint outside certain regions
  • Requires sales contact for any details
  • Less known compared to bigger players
  • Limited public integration list

Informations de contact :

  • Website: dnif.it
  • Address: NETMONASTERY Systems Inc, Mountain View, California, USA

15. Corner Bowl Server Manager

Corner Bowl Server Manager comes as Windows-focused software that mixes log management, SIEM functions, and basic server monitoring in one package. It collects logs from Windows, Linux, Azure, and some network devices, either with agents or without, and keeps them for compliance checks like PCI, NIST, or GDPR. Users also get resource monitoring for CPU, disk space, services, and a few built-in intrusion detection rules.

Installation happens on-premises on a Windows server, and licensing works per monitored host or device. A free trial runs fully featured for a set period. It tends to show up in smaller or mid-sized setups that already run a lot of Windows and want one tool instead of several separate ones.

Faits marquants :

  • Windows and Linux log collection with or without agents
  • Built-in compliance templates for common standards
  • Resource and service monitoring included
  • Basic intrusion detection rules
  • On-premises Windows installation
  • Essai gratuit disponible

Pour :

  • Covers logs and basic monitoring in one license
  • Simple setup for Windows-heavy environments
  • Direct Event Log batch import for audits
  • No cloud dependency

Cons :

  • Interface feels dated compared to modern tools
  • Limited scalability for very large environments
  • Mostly Windows-centric feature set
  • Documentation stays fairly basic

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.cornerbowlsoftware.com
  • Phone: 801-910-4256
  • Email: info@CornerBowlSoftware.com
  • Address: 982 Splendor Valley Rd Kamas UT, 84036 USA
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/corner-bowl-software
  • Twitter: x.com/BowlCorner

16. Securonix

Securonix delivers a cloud-native SIEM that bundles UEBA, SOAR functions, and threat intelligence into a single platform. It leans on agentic AI to cut false positives, automate investigations, and link related alerts together. Data stays hot and searchable for a full year without extra rehydration steps, and reporting targets compliance needs like SEC or GDPR.

Everything runs managed in the cloud with pricing based on data volume and features. Access starts after a demo and sales conversation. It fits organizations that already deal with tool sprawl and want one system for detection through response.

Faits marquants :

  • Combines SIEM, UEBA, and SOAR in one cloud platform
  • Agentic AI for alert handling and automation
  • Year-long hot data access
  • Built-in compliance reporting
  • Cloud-native deployment
  • Intégration des renseignements sur les menaces

Pour :

  • Reduces need for separate security tools
  • Automation lowers daily analyst workload
  • Keeps older data instantly available
  • Single pane for investigation and response

Cons :

  • Pricing and contracts require sales contact
  • Heavy reliance on cloud connectivity
  • Best value appears at larger data volumes
  • Learning curve for the AI-driven workflows

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.securonix.com
  • Email: info@securonix.com
  • Address: 400 Concar Dr, San Mateo, CA 94402
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/securonix
  • Twitter : x.com/Securonix

 

Pour conclure

At the end of the day, swapping out Graylog usually comes down to one simple question: what’s the thing that annoys you the most right now? Is it the constant Elasticsearch tuning, the surprise invoices, the pipeline syntax that feels like writing assembly, or just the fact that you’re still running a cluster in 2026?

Whatever it is, something on this list solves exactly that itch without forcing you into a whole new set of problems. Some options are basically “set it and forget it” clouds, others are “here’s the repo, good luck,” and a few sit in that sweet middle where you get modern features without selling your soul to a vendor.

Try a couple, break them a little on purpose, see which one doesn’t make you want to throw your laptop out the window. When you finally land on the one that just works, you’ll wonder why you waited this long. Logs shouldn’t feel like a second job.

 

Best AppDynamics Alternatives: Less Bloat, More Velocity in 2026

If you’re staring at yet another AppDynamics bill and wondering why “enterprise-grade” has to mean “enterprise-pain-in-the-ass,” It’s powerful, sure, but the licensing headaches, the agent sprawl, the endless console tours just to find one metric it starts to feel like you’re maintaining a monitoring platform instead of your actual product.

Good news: the market is stacked with legit alternatives from top companies that get it. Tools that spin up in minutes, cost a fraction, and still give you the tracing, alerting, and dashboards you need-without forcing you to hire a full-time “monitoring whisperer.”

Below are the standouts we’d actually use (and a bunch of our teams already have). No fluff, no forced rankings, just the options that let you get back to building instead of babysitting another ops tool. Let’s go.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst flips the usual infra problem on its head: instead of writing Terraform, YAML, or wrestling with cloud consoles, developers just declare what their app needs – CPU, memory, database type, networking rules – and the platform builds the secure, compliant infrastructure automatically across AWS, Azure, or GCP. Everything gets provisioned in minutes with built-in logging, monitoring, alerting, and cost tracking per app.

It comes as SaaS or self-hosted, so companies that want to keep things in-house can. The whole point is to let developers own the full lifecycle without waiting on a separate DevOps crew.

Faits marquants :

  • Declare app requirements, get full infra auto-provisioned
  • Built-in observability, security, and cost visibility
  • Works on any major cloud or self-hosted
  • No Terraform or cloud-specific knowledge needed

Pour :

  • Removes infra code and PR reviews completely
  • Instant environments for every branch or ticket
  • Real cost breakdown per application

Cons :

  • Still early, so some niche cloud services missing
  • You trade full manual control for speed

Informations de contact :

Datadog

2. Datadog

Datadog runs as a SaaS platform that pulls together infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, log management, real-user monitoring, and a bunch of other observability pieces into one place. The idea is to give everyone – devs, ops, security, even business folks – a single pane of glass for whatever is happening across the stack, whether it is on-prem, cloud, or a mix.

People use it to spot issues faster, secure applications and infrastructure, understand how users actually behave, and keep an eye on business metrics that matter. It works for small setups and large ones alike.

Faits marquants :

  • Full-stack observability in one SaaS product
  • Infrastructure, APM, logs, real-user monitoring, synthetics
  • Heavy focus on real-time dashboards and alerts
  • Works across clouds and on-prem

Pour :

  • Very tight integrations and turnkey dashboards
  • Fast setup for common tech stacks
  • Strong tracing and profiling capabilities

Cons :

  • Costs can climb quickly when you turn on all the modules
  • Some users find the UI a bit crowded once you have lots of data

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.datadoghq.com
  • Téléphone : 866 329-4466
  • Courriel : info@datadoghq.com
  • Adresse : 620 8th Ave 45th Floor, New York, NY 10018
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/datadog
  • Twitter : x.com/datadoghq
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/datadoghq
  • App Store : apps.apple.com/app/datadog/id1391380318
  • Google Play : play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.datadog.app

3. Dynatrace

Dynatrace positions itself as an AI-heavy observability platform that tries to automate as much as possible. It watches applications, infrastructure, user experience, security signals, logs, and even generative AI workloads, then uses its Davis AI engine to connect the dots and suggest or take actions.

The platform automatically maps dependencies, spots anomalies, and attempts to explain root causes without much manual configuration. It covers cloud platforms, Kubernetes, serverless, and traditional environments.

Faits marquants :

  • Automatic topology discovery and dependency mapping
  • Built-in AI for causation and anomaly detection
  • Covers application security and runtime vulnerability analysis
  • Supports observability for LLMs and AI agents

Pour :

  • Very little manual setup needed
  • Strong automation and remediation suggestions
  • Good at handling dynamic cloud-native environments

Cons :

  • Pricing is usage-based and can feel opaque
  • Less flexible when you want to heavily customize dashboards or queries

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.dynatrace.com
  • Téléphone : +1.650.436.6700
  • Courriel : sales@dynatrace.com
  • Adresse : 401 Castro Street, Second Floor Mountain View, CA, 94041 États-Unis d'Amérique
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/dynatrace
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Dynatrace
  • Twitter : x.com/Dynatrace
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/dynatrace

4. New Relic

New Relic delivers an observability platform that tries to cover the entire stack from infrastructure to application code to front-end user experience. Everything lives under one account and one data store, so queries and dashboards can pull from any part of the system without stitching things together manually.

It includes the usual metrics, events, logs, and traces, plus extras like synthetics, browser monitoring, and some business KPI tracking.

Faits marquants :

  • Single data platform for all telemetry types
  • Instant setup for many languages and frameworks
  • Includes browser and mobile monitoring out of the box
  • Free tier available with generous limits

Pour :

  • Easy to get started and add new services
  • Very developer-friendly query language (NRQL)
  • Pricing recently shifted to be more consumption-based

Cons :

  • Ingest-based pricing can still surprise you at scale
  • Some advanced features live behind higher plans

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : newrelic.com
  • Téléphone : (415) 660-9701
  • Adresse : 1100 Peachtree St NE, Atlanta, GA 30309
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/new-relic-inc-
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/NewRelic
  • Twitter : x.com/newrelic
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/newrelic

5. ManageEngine Applications Manager

ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance monitoring and observability tool that runs either on-prem or in your own data center or as a hosted instance. It monitors applications, servers, databases, clouds, and websites, with support for Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, PHP, Ruby, and a long list of other technologies.

It gives code-level diagnostics, distributed tracing, synthetic transactions from real browsers, and service maps. The tool also watches multi-cloud resources and virtualization platforms.

Faits marquants :

  • Deep code-level visibility and transaction tracing
  • Agentless database and server monitoring
  • Synthetic web transaction monitoring with Selenium scripts
  • Works on-premise or hosted

Pour :

  • Runs completely inside your network if you want
  • Broad technology coverage without extra agents
  • Straightforward licensing model

Cons :

  • UI feels a generation behind fully cloud-native tools
  • Setup and upgrades require more manual steps than pure SaaS options

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.manageengine.com
  • Téléphone : +1 408 916 9696 +1 408 916 9696
  • Courriel : pr@manageengine.com
  • Adresse : 4141 Hacienda Drive Pleasanton CA 94588 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/manageengine
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/ManageEngine
  • Twitter : x.com/manageengine
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/manageengine

6. SolarWinds

SolarWinds builds a range of IT management and monitoring tools, with a big chunk focused on observability, infrastructure, databases, and service management. Most products install on-premise or in private clouds, though some lighter pieces live in their SaaS offering. The platform leans heavily on discovering everything in the environment automatically and then giving admins dashboards, alerts, and basic AI-driven suggestions.

A lot of the tooling grew up in the era of physical servers and traditional networks, so it still feels comfortable for teams running mixed or legacy environments. Recent versions added more cloud coverage and incident-response workflows.

Faits marquants :

  • Strong network and server discovery
  • Database performance monitoring included
  • IT service management and incident workflows
  • Mix of on-prem and SaaS deployment options

Pour :

  • Very good at traditional data-center visibility
  • One-time license model available for some products
  • Familiar interface for long-time users

Cons :

  • Some components still feel dated compared to pure cloud tools
  • Upgrades and patching can be manual and slow

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.solarwinds.com
  • Téléphone : +1-866-530-8040
  • Courriel : sales@solarwinds.com
  • Adresse : 7171 Southwest Parkway Bldg 400 Austin, Texas 78735
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/solarwinds
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/SolarWinds
  • Twitter : x.com/solarwinds
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/solarwindsinc

7. Splunk

Splunk started as a log-management powerhouse and has grown into a broader data platform that handles security, observability, and custom analytics. After joining forces with Cisco, the focus shifted toward combining network, endpoint, and application data on one backend. Most customers run the cloud version now, but on-prem and hybrid setups still exist.

People feed it logs, metrics, traces, or pretty much any machine data, then search, dashboard, and alert on it. The search language is famously flexible once you get used to it.

Faits marquants :

  • Search-driven approach to any machine data
  • Heavy use in security and operations centers
  • Real-time streaming and large-scale indexing
  • Cloud, on-prem, or hybrid deployment

Pour :

  • Extremely powerful when you master the query language
  • Huge library of add-ons and integrations
  • Good at handling raw, unstructured data

Cons :

  • Storage and compute costs add up fast at scale
  • Learning curve can be steep for new users

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.splunk.com
  • Téléphone : 1 866.438.7758 1 866.438.7758
  • Courriel : info@splunk.com
  • Adresse : 3098 Olsen Drive San Jose, California 95128
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/splunk
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/splunk
  • Twitter : x.com/splunk
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/splunk

grafana

8. Grafana

Grafana is mostly known for its open-source dashboard front-end, but the company also maintains several backends. Tempo is their distributed-tracing solution that only needs object storage (S3, GCS, Azure Blob) to run. It skips traditional indexing to keep costs down and works natively with Jaeger, Zipkin, and OpenTelemetry formats.

Most users run Tempo alongside Prometheus for metrics and Loki for logs, all visualized in Grafana dashboards. You can self-host everything or use Grafana Cloud, which includes hosted Tempo instances.

Faits marquants :

  • Tracing backend that only requires object storage
  • No indexing of trace contents
  • Tight integration with Prometheus, Loki, and Grafana UI
  • Fully open-source core (AGPLv3)

Pour :

  • Very low storage cost compared to indexed tracing systems
  • Simple operations – just point it at a bucket
  • Easy to drop into existing Grafana setups

Cons :

  • Finding specific traces relies on trace ID or tags stored elsewhere
  • Fewer built-in analytics than heavily indexed competitors

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : grafana.com
  • Courriel : info@grafana.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/grafana-labs
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/grafana
  • Twitter : x.com/grafana

9. Elastic Observability

Elastic Observability sits on top of the Elasticsearch and pushes a unified approach where logs, metrics, traces, and synthetics all land in the same place. Everything follows OpenTelemetry standards from the start, so you can send native OTel data without extra agents or vendor extensions. The platform leans hard into search-driven exploration and lately added agentic AI features that try to summarize issues or suggest next steps.

Most deployments run in Elastic Cloud, but self-managed clusters still work fine. People who already use the ELK stack for logging usually find the jump to full observability pretty smooth.

Faits marquants :

  • Single backend for logs, metrics, traces, and profiles
  • Native OpenTelemetry ingestion without proprietary changes
  • Heavy search and AI-assisted analysis
  • Prebuilt dashboards and anomaly detection included

Pour :

  • Extremely fast log and trace search even on large volumes
  • No separate agents needed for basic OTel data
  • Easy to extend with custom machine-learning jobs

Cons :

  • Costs grow with ingested volume and retention
  • Some traditional APM features feel bolted on compared to pure-play tools

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.elastic.co
  • Courriel : info@elastic.co
  • Adresse : Keizersgracht 281 1016 ED Amsterdam
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/elastic-co
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/elastic.co
  • Twitter : x.com/elastic

10. LogicMonitor

LogicMonitor is a SaaS monitoring platform that watches infrastructure, clouds, containers, applications, and networks from one place. It ships with a large collection of pre-made collectors and integrations, so most devices and services get discovered and monitored automatically after you drop in the agent or enable cloud connectors.

The newer Edwin AI piece tries to cut down alert noise and group related incidents. Deployment stays fully cloud-hosted on their side.

Faits marquants :

  • Broad out-of-box coverage for hardware, cloud, and apps
  • Automatic discovery and topology mapping
  • Built-in AIOps for alert deduplication
  • Collector-based or agentless options

Pour :

  • Quick to cover a mixed environment
  • Clean topology views update themselves
  • Forecasting and capacity planning built in

Cons :

  • Pricing scales with the number of monitored resources
  • Deep application code visibility requires extra modules

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.logicmonitor.com
  • Téléphone : 888 415 6442
  • Courriel : sales@logicmonitor.com
  • Adresse : 98 San Jacinto Blvd Suite 1300 Austin, TX 78701 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/logicmonitor
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/LogicMonitor
  • Twitter : x.com/LogicMonitor
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/logicmonitor

11. Edge Delta

Edge Delta takes a different angle – it pushes analysis as close to the data source as possible. Lightweight agents stream data before it ever hits central storage, running anomaly detection, parsing, and even some remediation steps right there on the host or in the pipeline. Only the digested or flagged data gets forwarded, which keeps central costs down.

Users can build or tweak their own AI agents with custom prompts and connect them to Slack, PagerDuty, or ticketing systems. Everything stays streaming-focused.

Faits marquants :

  • Processing and AI analysis at the edge
  • Configurable AI agents for SRE and security tasks
  • Streaming pipeline with minimal central storage
  • Free sign-up tier available

Pour :

  • Dramatically lower data transfer and storage bills
  • Very fast feedback loop when something looks odd
  • Easy to create custom automation agents

Cons :

  • You give up some historical depth unless you forward raw data too
  • Still newer, so fewer battle-tested integrations than older platforms

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : edgedelta.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/edgedelta
  • Twitter : x.com/edge_delta

12. eG Innovations

eG Innovations delivers monitoring that focuses on user experience and root-cause diagnosis across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid setups. A single agent correlates activity from virtual desktops, applications, databases, storage, all the way to the underlying infrastructure. The patented correlation engine tries to pinpoint why something feels slow instead of just showing that it is slow.

It works well for Citrix, VMware Horizon, and classic enterprise apps, alongside newer cloud workloads. Deployment can be on-prem or SaaS.

Faits marquants :

  • Strong correlation across tiers (VDI, app, DB, storage)
  • Automatic root-cause diagnosis engine
  • Single agent for end-to-end visibility
  • Good coverage of legacy and virtual-desktop environments

Pour :

  • Very good at complex Citrix/VDI troubleshooting
  • One console for user experience down to hardware
  • Clear “why” answers when things degrade

Cons :

  • Interface looks older than most cloud-native tools
  • Less emphasis on modern distributed tracing compared to others

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.eginnovations.com
  • Téléphone : +1 (866) 526 6700
  • Adresse : 33 Wood Ave. South, Suite 600, Iselin, NJ 08830, USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/eg-innovations
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/eGInnovations
  • Twitter : x.com/eginnovations

13. Sematext

Sematext runs a cloud observability platform that bundles logs, metrics, traces, synthetics, and some front-end monitoring in one package. You get pre-built dashboards for most common stacks right away, and the whole thing stays focused on keeping setup simple and costs predictable. Most users go with the hosted version, though self-hosted agents are still an option if you want.

The pricing model lets you mix and match features and retention without too many surprises, and support answers fast even on lower plans. It works fine for smaller setups or when you don’t want to juggle separate tools.

Faits marquants :

  • Logs, metrics, traces, and synthetics in one service
  • Ready-made dashboards for popular technologies
  • Flexible retention and plan mixing
  • 14-day free trial, no credit card needed

Pour :

  • Very quick to spin up monitoring for new services
  • Tarification transparente basée sur l'utilisation
  • Solid alerting and anomaly detection out of the box

Cons :

  • Less depth in code-level profiling than some dedicated APM tools
  • UI can feel a bit busy when you have many apps

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : sematext.com
  • Téléphone : +1 347-480-1610
  • Courriel : info@sematext.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/sematext-international-llc
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Sematext
  • Twitter : x.com/sematext

14. Scout APM

Scout APM keeps things lightweight and developer-focused, mainly watching Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, and a few other languages. It hooks into the app with just a gem or package, then shows transaction traces, slow database queries, memory bloat, and N+1 issues without much noise. Lately they added tight integration with local AI coding assistants through MCP.

Errors, logs, and traces all land in the same view, so jumping between tools is rare. Pricing stays per-app and fairly flat.

Faits marquants :

  • Code-level tracing with almost no config
  • Automatic N+1 and slow-query detection
  • Built-in error tracking and log linking
  • Works with AI coding assistants locally

Pour :

  • Super low overhead on the app
  • Clean, focused interface
  • Easy to understand pricing

Cons :

  • Limited language support compared to bigger platforms
  • No infrastructure or host metrics included

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.scoutapm.com
  • Email: support@scoutapm.com
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/scout
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/ScoutAPM
  • Twitter: x.com/ScoutAPM

15. Glassbox

Glassbox records actual user sessions on web and mobile, then layers analytics on top to spot struggle points, errors, and journey drop-offs. It captures clicks, scrolls, rage clicks, and form issues in real time and replays them exactly as the visitor saw them. Compliance-focused companies use the record-keeping part for audit trails.

It’s less about server-side performance and more about what the customer actually experiences, though some backend tagging is possible.

Faits marquants :

  • Full session replay with masking
  • Struggle and friction scoring
  • Mobile app analytics included
  • Digital record-keeping for compliance

Pour :

  • You literally see what users see
  • Strong privacy and masking controls
  • Great for conversion-rate troubleshooting

Cons :

  • Not a traditional APM or infra monitoring tool
  • Storage needs grow fast with traffic

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.glassbox.com
  • Phone: +1 646-397-5283
  • Address: 42 Broadway Suite 12-530 New York, 10004
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/glassbox-solutions
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/Glassbox-103555754681679
  • Twitter : x.com/GlassboxDigita

 

Pour conclure

Ditching AppDynamics usually boils down to cost, overhead, or just being sick of the red tape. Good news: the alternatives now range from “declare your app and never touch Terraform again” to AI that actually tells you why things instead of screaming alerts, or pipelines that cut your ingest bill in half without throwing data away.

Pick two or three that catch your eye, run the trials on real services for a week, and you’ll feel immediately which one gets out of your way and lets you ship. Do that, and your next on-call will finally be quiet.

 

Argo CD Alternatives for Teams That Want a Different GitOps Flow

GitOps sounds neat until you’re knee-deep in pipelines that don’t behave the way you expect. Argo CD solves a lot of that for many teams, but it’s not the only option anymore. There’s a whole wave of companies building tools that handle deployments, automate the dull parts, and give you a clearer view of what’s actually happening inside your clusters.

This overview walks through platforms that step into the same space but take their own approach. Some keep things lightweight. Some offer more guardrails. Some simply try to save you from staring at dashboards all day. The point is to help you see what else is out there and decide which style of GitOps fits how you already work instead of forcing you into a shape that never quite matched.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst takes a pretty different angle compared to most tools you’d put next to Argo CD. Instead of focusing on syncing manifests or managing clusters, they go straight for the part developers usually dread the most: all the infrastructure setup that has to happen before an app ever ships. Their whole idea is that teams shouldn’t have to write Terraform, troubleshoot YAML, or learn the quirks of three different cloud providers just to get an app running. You tell AppFirst what the app actually needs, and the platform fills in the rest with ready to use infrastructure that follows the usual security and compliance rules.

They position themselves as an option for teams that want the benefits of automation without the overhead of running their own platform engineering stack. Logging, monitoring, networking, databases, identity, all that stuff gets wired up in the background. It feels closer to a platform layer that sits above the cloud rather than a GitOps controller, but it still fits into the Argo CD alternatives list because it removes the need for most infra pipelines entirely. For teams that want to ship fast without building a whole toolchain first, AppFirst ends up being a pretty practical direction.

Faits marquants :

  • Application first workflow that avoids Terraform, CDK, and YAML
  • Handles provisioning across AWS, Azure, and GCP
  • Built in logging, monitoring, and alerting
  • Central auditing and cost visibility per app
  • Fits teams that want to move quickly without homegrown infra tooling
  • Supports both SaaS and self hosted deployment

Services :

  • Automatic provisioning of compute, databases, and messaging systems
  • Networking, IAM, and secret setup based on app requirements
  • Infrastructure wide logging and monitoring
  • Compliance aligned configuration by default
  • App centric cost tracking and audit logs
  • Platform hosting with managed or self hosted options

Contact Info :

2. FluxCD

FluxCD shows up a lot in conversations about Argo CD alternatives because it tackles the same core problem: keeping Kubernetes deployments predictable without making engineers babysit every update. The project leans on Git as the single place where changes start, so whatever gets deployed is always tied back to a commit. Teams use Flux when they want a GitOps flow that stays hands-off, keeps clusters aligned with what is written in the repo, and quietly fixes drift when something changes behind the scenes.

Flux also fits well when a team wants flexibility in how they structure their pipeline. It works with the usual Git providers, container registries, CI tools, and policy systems without forcing a new stack. On top of basic continuous delivery, it includes features for progressive rollouts, multi-cluster setups, and managing both apps and infrastructure under one workflow. Many teams look at it as a close alternative to Argo CD, just with a different feel and a bit more emphasis on Kubernetes-native controllers.

Faits marquants :

  • Commonly used as a practical Argo CD alternative
  • Git as the source of truth for Kubernetes deployments
  • Automated syncing and drift correction built into the workflow
  • Supports canary releases and gradual rollouts through Flagger
  • Works with major Git providers, registries, and CI tools
  • Handles multi-cluster and multi-tenant setups

Services :

  • GitOps-focused continuous delivery tooling
  • Progressive delivery support for canaries and A/B changes
  • Automated container image update process
  • Integration with Helm, Kustomize, and OCI artifacts
  • Multi-cluster lifecycle and infrastructure management
  • Policy checks and notification integrations

Informations de contact :

  • Website: fluxcd.io
  • Email: cncf-flux-dev+help@lists.cncf.io
  • Twitter: x.com/fluxcd

3. Spinnaker

Spinnaker comes up a lot when people look for Argo CD alternatives, mostly because it approaches continuous delivery from a slightly different angle. Instead of staying tightly focused on GitOps, they lean into pipeline style workflows that handle bigger, more complex release setups. Teams use it when they have apps running across several cloud providers or when deployments involve a mix of VM images, containers, and older systems that still need to stay in the loop. It gives them a way to manage all of that without scattering scripts everywhere.

They also put a lot of weight on keeping pipelines flexible. Spinnaker lets teams plug in automated tests, safety checks, approval steps, and rollout strategies without reinventing everything each time. It works with common CI tools and ties into cloud platforms so a deployment can roll out, pause, or roll back based on whatever conditions a team sets. For anyone who wants something less GitOps heavy but still wants structure, Spinnaker tends to feel like a practical alternative to Argo CD.

Faits marquants :

  • Often used by teams exploring non GitOps alternatives to Argo CD
  • Pipeline based approach for complex or multi cloud delivery
  • Supports automated rollout strategies like canary and blue/green
  • Works with common CI tools and cloud providers
  • Useful for teams mixing containers, VMs, and legacy workloads

Services :

  • Pipeline based continuous delivery setup
  • Deployment strategies including canary and blue/green
  • Intégration avec les principales plates-formes en nuage
  • CI triggers and artifact handling
  • Monitoring and notification integration
  • Role based access controls and approval steps

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : spinnaker.io
  • Twitter : x.com/spinnakerio

jenkins

4. Jenkins X

Jenkins X often comes up when teams want something that feels a bit more automated and hands-off compared to Argo CD. Instead of expecting everyone to learn every detail of Kubernetes or Tekton, they try to handle most of that work in the background. The idea is pretty simple: you write code, push changes, and Jenkins X builds out the pipelines, handles the environments, and keeps things moving through GitOps without a lot of manual setup. It is especially useful for teams that want CI and CD wrapped together instead of juggling separate tools.

They also put a noticeable amount of effort into the developer workflow. Things like preview environments, pull request comments, and automatic promotion between environments make the whole process feel more connected to day-to-day development. It fits well as an Argo CD alternative when a team wants GitOps but also wants built-in CI, chat feedback, and a more guided workflow that does not require constant tweaking.

Faits marquants :

  • A common alternative to Argo CD for teams wanting CI and CD together
  • Automates Tekton pipelines without needing deep Kubernetes knowledge
  • Uses GitOps to manage environments and promotions
  • Creates preview environments for pull requests
  • Provides chat feedback on commits, issues, and pull requests

Services :

  • Automated CI and CD through Tekton pipelines
  • GitOps based environment management
  • Pull request preview environments
  • ChatOps for code and deployment feedback
  • Version upgrade automation
  • Community support and contributor resources

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : jenkins-x.io

5. Codefresh

Codefresh often shows up in the Argo CD alternatives list because they approach GitOps from a slightly different angle. Instead of trying to replace Argo CD, they build around it and fill in the parts that usually end up covered in custom scripts. Their focus is on the middle steps of the delivery flow, the part between a commit and a production rollout where teams usually test, promote, and double check everything. They try to make that whole stretch easier to manage so the workflow does not rely on a pile of one-off pipelines.

They also make it easier for platform teams to shape a full delivery lifecycle without starting from scratch. Codefresh lets teams map environments, define promotion rules, and manage several Argo CD instances without jumping between tools. Developers get a bit more clarity too, since they can follow releases without chasing down tickets or asking the platform team for updates. As an Argo CD alternative, they fit well for teams that want to keep Argo around but want more structure on top of it.

Faits marquants :

  • Often used by teams looking for an Argo CD alternative with added workflow support
  • Helps replace custom scripts with a defined promotion flow
  • Works directly with existing Argo CD setups
  • Gives developers clearer visibility into releases
  • Lets platform teams model their full delivery lifecycle

Services :

  • GitOps based promotion flow management
  • CI and CD through container focused pipelines
  • Environment mapping and application promotion
  • Support and guidance for Argo CD implementations
  • Developer self service for deployments
  • Training resources around GitOps and Argo CD

Informations de contact :

  • Website: codefresh.io
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/codefresh
  • Twitter: x.com/codefresh
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/codefresh.io

6. Harness

Harness shows up a lot when teams start comparing Argo CD with more all-in-one delivery platforms. Instead of only focusing on GitOps, they try to cover the whole deployment flow in one place. Their setup leans heavily on UI driven pipelines, verification steps, and built in integrations instead of relying on a maze of custom scripts. For teams that want something a bit more guided and less DIY than Argo CD, Harness tends to fit that space pretty naturally.

They also offer GitOps features for teams that still want a repo centric workflow but with more tooling around it. Things like bidirectional sync, diff views, and triggers based on Git events feel familiar to anyone used to Argo CD, but Harness wraps those features inside a larger platform that handles containers, serverless, traditional apps, and a bunch of operational checks. It makes sense as an Argo CD alternative when a team wants GitOps but also wants pipelines, verification, and deployment automation all sitting together.

Faits marquants :

  • Often chosen as an Argo CD alternative when teams want a more complete delivery platform
  • Supports GitOps workflows with repo based sync and change tracking
  • Pipelines include verification, approvals, and custom scripting
  • Works with different workload types, not just Kubernetes
  • Integrates with secrets managers, monitoring tools, and ticketing systems

Services :

  • Continuous delivery pipelines
  • GitOps based deployment management
  • Deployment verification using monitoring tools
  • Secrets management integrations
  • Pipeline triggers based on Git events or custom conditions
  • Support for containers, serverless, and traditional application stacks

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.harness.io
  • Address: 55 Stockton Street, Floor 8, San Francisco CA 94108 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/harnessinc
  • Twitter : x.com/harnessio
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/harness.io
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/harnessinc

7. Devtron

Devtron shows up pretty often when teams want something that still uses Argo CD under the hood but adds a bit more structure around day-to-day work. Instead of juggling several tools to get visibility, manage clusters, and keep track of policies, they roll everything into one place. Their platform gives teams a clearer view of what is running where, and it adds checks around security and release flow that many people usually stitch together themselves.

They also focus a lot on making multi-cluster work less painful. Teams can manage promotions, enforce policies, and handle complex releases without constantly switching context. Since Devtron plugs into existing CI tools, it fits nicely for teams that want an Argo CD alternative but do not necessarily want to replace the whole pipeline. It is more about giving Argo CD extra guardrails and better orchestration rather than moving away from GitOps.

Faits marquants :

  • Often used as an Argo CD alternative for teams wanting more orchestration and visibility
  • Built around Kubernetes with support for multi-cluster deployments
  • Adds security checks and policy enforcement into the deployment flow
  • Extends GitOps workflows with release management tools
  • Connects to external CI systems for flexible pipelines
  • Supports advanced deployment strategies like blue-green and canary

Services :

  • Gestion du cycle de vie des applications
  • GitOps based deployment and environment management
  • Security scanning and policy enforcement
  • Release orchestration for multi service deployments
  • CI integration and custom pre and post steps
  • Deployment strategies with automated health checks

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : devtron.ai
  • Address: 8 The Green Ste A,  Dover, Kent,  Delaware, 19901 – USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/devtron-labs
  • Twitter : x.com/DevtronL

8. Plural

Plural tends to appeal to teams that are running more than just a couple of clusters and want some structure around all the moving pieces. Instead of treating GitOps as something that only applies to app deployments, they fold it into how the entire platform is managed. Their setup leans on an agent model, so clusters across different environments stay connected without everyone having to babysit them. It gives platform teams a way to keep both apps and infrastructure changes flowing through pull requests, which feels familiar if you’re already used to Argo CD but need something that scales a bit cleaner.

They also focus a lot on making life easier for developers. Plural gives them a self-service setup through GitHub pull requests, which means they can push changes without waiting on a platform engineer every time. The Terraform integration is a big part of this, letting teams manage cloud resources and Kubernetes stuff under the same workflow. As an Argo CD alternative, Plural fits well when the goal is to manage entire clusters and fleets, not just deploy workloads.

Faits marquants :

  • Often used by teams running large or distributed Kubernetes fleets
  • GitOps based deployment combined with Terraform automation
  • Agent based model for managing clusters across clouds or on-prem
  • Developer self service through PR workflows
  • Unified control plane for multi cluster operations

Services :

  • GitOps driven continuous delivery
  • Terraform based infrastructure automation
  • Cluster fleet management via agents
  • Self service deployment workflows
  • Multi cloud and on premises support

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.plural.sh
  • Email: support@plural.sh
  • Address: 12 East 49th Street, Floor 11, New York, NY, 10017 USA
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/pluralsh
  • Twitter: x.com/plural_sh

9. Tekton

Tekton comes up a lot when teams want something more flexible than Argo CD and prefer building their own CI/CD flow piece by piece. Instead of giving you one predefined pipeline model, Tekton hands you the building blocks and lets you assemble things the way your team actually works. Everything runs natively on Kubernetes, so the workflow feels consistent whether you’re building, testing, or deploying across different environments.

They also lean into standardization, which helps when a team is juggling tools from different vendors or mixing cloud and on-prem setups. Tekton pipelines can sit under other platforms like Jenkins X or Skaffold, but plenty of teams use it on its own as an Argo CD alternative when they want more control over how automation fits into their GitOps flow. It’s not trying to replace Argo CD directly. It’s more like giving you the low level pieces to craft your own version of a delivery system.

Faits marquants :

  • Used as an Argo CD alternative for teams wanting more customizable pipelines
  • Kubernetes native framework for building CI/CD systems
  • Works alongside tools like Jenkins, Jenkins X, Skaffold, and Knative
  • Designed for flexible workflows tailored to team requirements
  • Encourages standardization across vendors and environments

Services :

  • Pipeline and task orchestration
  • Build, test, and deploy automation
  • Integration with existing CI/CD platforms
  • Cloud native execution across providers
  • Extensible components for custom workflows

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : tekton.dev

10. GoCD

GoCD tends to attract teams that want more visibility into how work actually moves from commit to production. Instead of focusing on GitOps like Argo CD, they lean into pipeline modeling and traceability. Their value stream map gives a full picture of every step in the delivery path, which is handy when a team has a lot of moving parts and wants to see where things slow down or break. It feels more like a workflow engine than a Git syncing tool, which is exactly why some teams consider it an Argo CD alternative when they need deeper control over the delivery flow.

They also put effort into handling complex pipelines without needing a pile of add-ons. Parallel execution, dependency management, and detailed change tracking are built in, so teams can troubleshoot without digging through different tools to figure out what went wrong. GoCD fits well when you want strong pipeline orchestration and a clear view of how everything connects, especially in setups where the deployment story goes beyond Kubernetes.

Faits marquants :

  • Often chosen as an Argo CD alternative for teams needing detailed pipeline modeling
  • Built in value stream visualization for full delivery flow insight
  • Supports complex pipeline structures with dependencies and parallel execution
  • Cloud native support for Kubernetes, Docker, and common cloud platforms
  • Offers strong traceability for commits and builds
  • Extensible through a plugin system

Services :

  • CI/CD pipeline orchestration
  • Value stream mapping and workflow visualization
  • Build and deploy automation across cloud and container environments
  • Detailed audit and traceability features
  • Plugin integration for external tools
  • Community support and documentation

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.gocd.org

11. Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy is the sort of tool teams look at when they’ve outgrown the simple “push to cluster and hope for the best” model. Instead of trying to act like a GitOps controller the way Argo CD does, they focus on everything that happens after your CI pipeline finishes. Their whole thing is taking the deploy step off your plate and giving you one place to run releases, manage environments, and keep deployments consistent no matter where the app ends up living. It fits especially well in setups where Kubernetes is only part of the picture and teams still have to deploy to VMs, cloud services, or on prem machines.

They also lean pretty heavily into making complex deployments repeatable without drowning in scripts. Octopus pipelines can model approvals, promotions, runbooks, and all the day to day operational tasks that usually get scattered across ad hoc tools. And for teams already using Argo CD, they don’t force a replacement. Octopus can sit on top and coordinate GitOps deployments across clusters while adding compliance controls and a central view. That flexibility is a big reason people bring it up when talking through Argo CD alternatives.

Faits marquants :

  • Often used as an Argo CD alternative when deployments span more than Kubernetes
  • Handles release orchestration and environment management in one place
  • Supports multi cloud, on prem, and container based deployments
  • Works alongside existing CI tools instead of replacing them
  • Can automate GitOps flows on top of Argo CD setups
  • Offers compliance features, RBAC, audit logs, and approval flows

Services :

  • Deployment and release automation
  • Runbook automation for operational tasks
  • Environment promotion and version tracking
  • Multi cloud and on premises deployment support
  • Integration with CI servers and IaC tools
  • Centralized dashboard for monitoring deployments across targets

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : octopus.com
  • Email: sales@octopus.com
  • Phone: +1-512-823-0256
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/octopus-deploy
  • Twitter : x.com/OctopusDeploy

12. Qovery

Qovery is one of those platforms that shows up when teams want the convenience of a PaaS but still need the power and flexibility of Kubernetes. Instead of expecting developers to deal with manifests, cluster quirks, or a pile of IaC templates, they wrap all of that into a workflow that feels closer to a simple git push. Their whole angle is giving teams a full platform that handles infrastructure, deployment steps, and scaling without requiring everyone to become a Kubernetes expert. For folks comparing Argo CD alternatives, Qovery stands out because it does way more than sync resources from Git.

They also lean heavily into automation, especially around GitOps. Instead of writing YAML by hand, the platform generates and manages the manifests behind the scenes and keeps everything in Git so you still get traceability without the manual overhead. Qovery is the kind of choice teams make when they want Kubernetes capabilities without all the usual cognitive load. It fits as an Argo CD alternative not because it behaves like Argo CD, but because it removes the need for Argo CD in the first place by acting as a full deployment platform.

Faits marquants :

  • Often used as an Argo CD alternative for teams wanting a full platform rather than a single GitOps controller
  • Automates infrastructure, networking, databases, and deployment workflows
  • Developer friendly workflow similar to a PaaS style git push deployment
  • Automatically handles Kubernetes manifests and GitOps syncing
  • Runs inside your own cloud account for data control
  • Includes enterprise features like RBAC and audit logging

Services :

  • Automated provisioning of infrastructure and environments
  • GitOps based deployment and manifest management
  • Application scaling and lifecycle automation
  • Multi cloud deployment across AWS, GCP, and Azure
  • Database and networking setup
  • Compliance and access control features

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.qovery.com
  • Email: support@qovery.com
  • Address:  128 rue la Boétie, 75008 Paris France
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/qovery
  • Twitter: x.com/qovery_

13. Northflank

Northflank is one of those platforms that tries to cover the whole delivery story instead of just the Kubernetes part. They take GitOps and stretch it across everything a team usually has to manage: applications, databases, background jobs, AI workloads, and all the little pieces that normally live outside a GitOps setup. Instead of pushing YAML back and forth, they use templates to describe the whole stack, which makes things feel a lot cleaner when you’re working with multiple environments. It ends up being a nice fit for teams that like the ideas behind Argo CD but need something that handles more than cluster resources.

They also make the back and forth between Git and the UI feel pretty natural. If you make changes in Git, Northflank picks them up. If you click around in the UI, it writes those updates back to the repo. That keeps Git as the source of truth without forcing everyone to stop touching the platform directly. And since you can deploy it on their cloud or in your own VPC, it works for teams that have stricter requirements around where things run. Overall, it sits in the Argo CD alternatives conversation because it brings GitOps principles to the entire stack, not just Kubernetes objects.

Faits marquants :

  • GitOps workflow that handles more than Kubernetes manifests
  • Bidirectional sync between Git and the platform
  • Template based infrastructure definitions with reusable patterns
  • Supports apps, databases, jobs, and GPU workloads
  • Can run on Northflank’s managed cloud or inside your own VPC
  • Includes CI/CD pipelines and preview environments

Services :

  • Infrastructure and application deployment using GitOps
  • Built in CI/CD for automatic builds
  • Release flow orchestration
  • Database and job management
  • Multi tenant team management and RBAC
  • Platform hosting on managed or self hosted environments

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : northflank.com
  • Email: contact@northflank.com
  • Address: 20-22 Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GU
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/northflank
  • Twitter : x.com/northflank

14. Portainer

Portainer is one of those tools teams pick up when they want Kubernetes and container management to feel a little less like wrestling with a puzzle and a little more like using a normal platform. Instead of focusing only on GitOps the way Argo CD does, they approach the problem from the angle of day to day operational control. Their interface gives teams a clearer view of what is running across clusters, edge devices, and different container environments without forcing everyone to navigate raw YAML or terminal windows. It fits nicely in conversations about Argo CD alternatives because it solves a different pain point while still supporting GitOps workflows.

They also lean heavily into simplifying how teams scale and govern container environments. Portainer can sit on top of Kubernetes, Docker, and Podman, which works well for companies that have a mix of old and new systems. The platform handles access control, fleet management, and automation in a way that helps teams adopt Kubernetes gradually rather than all at once. It is not trying to replace Argo CD as a GitOps controller. Instead, it complements or replaces it depending on how much control and visibility a team wants from a single place.

Faits marquants :

  • Used as an Argo CD alternative when teams want broader container and cluster management
  • Centralized UI for Kubernetes, Docker, Podman, and edge environments
  • Built in GitOps automation without needing external tools
  • Role based access and policy controls for standardizing operations
  • Fleet management support for large or distributed setups
  • Cloud neutral design that runs on bare metal, cloud, or edge

Services :

  • GitOps based deployment automation
  • Container and cluster management across multiple environments
  • RBAC, SSO, and policy enforcement
  • Edge and IoT device management
  • Operational automation through runbooks and templates
  • Managed platform services for teams that want hands on support

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.portainer.io
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/portainer

15. Heroku

Heroku sits in a different corner of the world compared to Argo CD, but it still ends up on the alternatives list because of how much deployment work it absorbs for teams. Instead of asking developers to learn Kubernetes, manage manifests, or build out their own GitOps pipelines, Heroku wraps the whole experience into a simple push to deploy flow. Their platform takes over everything behind the scenes, from runtime management to scaling to handling databases, which makes it appealing for teams that want to skip the cluster part entirely and focus on building the app.

Even though Heroku is not a GitOps tool, it replaces the need for one in a lot of cases. Their continuous delivery workflow, review apps, quick rollbacks, and built in governance features mean many teams never feel the need to manage deployments at the Kubernetes level. The platform has also expanded into AI focused tooling, managed inference, and a deep add on ecosystem. So while it is not trying to compete with Argo CD on cluster control, it does offer a much simpler path for teams that would rather trade low level control for a cleaner developer experience.

Faits marquants :

  • Provides a managed platform that replaces manual Kubernetes and GitOps work
  • Simple deployment flow that avoids the need for manifests or custom pipelines
  • Built in features for scaling, rollback, metrics, and runtime management
  • Large add on and buildpack ecosystem for extending applications
  • Support for many languages and custom stacks
  • Enterprise options like private spaces, advanced security, and SSO

Services :

  • Application deployment and runtime management
  • Managed Postgres and key value data services
  • Review apps and continuous delivery workflows
  • Buildpacks for customizing language stacks
  • Enterprise hosting with isolation and compliance
  • Team and resource management for larger organizations

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.heroku.com
  • Adresse : 415 Mission Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, États-Unis
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/heroku
  • Twitter: x.com/heroku

 

Pour conclure

Argo CD might have kicked off a whole wave of GitOps adoption, but the ecosystem around it has grown into something much wider and more flexible. There’s no single path teams follow anymore. Some want tight control over clusters, some want to offload the infra burden entirely, and others just need a cleaner workflow that fits how their developers already work.

The good news is there’s plenty to choose from. Whether you lean toward platforms that simplify everything or tools that give you more room to customize, there’s an option that matches how your team thinks and ships. If you’re unsure where to begin, try one or two on a small project. You’ll quickly figure out which approach feels natural and which one adds more friction than it solves.

 

Les meilleures alternatives à Gatling pour les tests de charge quotidiens

Les tests de charge ne sont plus aussi simples qu'avant. Les applications sont plus volumineuses, le trafic est imprévisible et personne n'a le temps de surveiller des scripts fragiles toute la semaine. Gatling convient toujours à beaucoup de gens, mais il est tout à fait normal qu'il semble un peu lourd ou qu'il ne soit plus adapté.

Il existe aujourd'hui plusieurs entreprises leaders qui proposent ce type de services, chacune à leur manière. Certaines offrent un flux de travail plus clair et plus souple. D'autres prennent tout en charge, vous évitant ainsi d'avoir à vous soucier des serveurs ou des testeurs. Cet aperçu n'a pas pour but de désigner le “ meilleur ” outil. Il s'agit plutôt d'un tour d'horizon rapide des solutions disponibles afin que vous puissiez déterminer celle qui correspond le mieux au mode de fonctionnement de votre équipe.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst n'est pas un outil de test de charge au sens traditionnel du terme, mais il revient souvent dans les discussions sur les alternatives à Gatling, car certaines équipes souhaitent tout simplement éviter d'avoir à gérer l'infrastructure. Au lieu d'écrire du code Terraform, de gérer des VPC ou de se débattre avec la configuration du cloud, elles décrivent les besoins de leur application et laissent AppFirst s'occuper du reste. Cet outil séduit les équipes qui souhaitent avancer rapidement sans avoir à créer leur propre plateforme interne ni à s'appuyer sur une configuration DevOps lourde pour déployer de nouveaux services.

Ils s'attachent à fournir aux développeurs un moyen de livrer des applications sans se soucier de l'infrastructure sous-jacente. La journalisation, la surveillance, les alertes, la mise en réseau, les bases de données et tous les éléments habituels sont automatiquement provisionnés sur le cloud utilisé par l'équipe. Pour les groupes qui se soucient des performances et de la stabilité, mais qui ne souhaitent pas gérer une infrastructure de test, AppFirst offre une approche différente de celle de Gatling. Il élimine les frictions liées au déploiement afin que les équipes puissent se concentrer sur l'écriture du code et l'évaluation du comportement de leurs applications une fois celles-ci mises en production.

Faits marquants :

  • Envisagé par les équipes qui souhaitent éviter la gestion de l'infrastructure tout en évaluant les alternatives à Gatling.
  • Permet aux développeurs de définir les exigences des applications au lieu d'écrire la configuration du cloud.
  • Fournit des fonctionnalités intégrées de journalisation, de surveillance et d'alerte.
  • Fonctionne sur AWS, Azure et GCP
  • Propose des déploiements SaaS et auto-hébergés

Services :

  • Approvisionnement automatique de l'infrastructure cloud
  • Outils d'observabilité intégrés
  • Visibilité et audit des coûts centrés sur les applications
  • Prise en charge multi-cloud
  • Options SaaS auto-hébergées et gérées

Contact Info :

2. Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter revient souvent lorsque les gens commencent à chercher des alternatives à Gatling. Il existe depuis longtemps, et les équipes s'y tournent généralement lorsqu'elles recherchent une solution open source qui ne les enferme pas dans une seule façon de procéder aux tests de charge. JMeter fonctionne au niveau du protocole, il gère donc de nombreux scénarios différents sans prétendre être un navigateur complet. Il n'est pas sophistiqué, mais il offre aux équipes techniques une configuration familière et flexible qu'elles peuvent adapter à leurs besoins.

Comme il s'agit d'un projet Apache, la communauté continue d'ajouter des extensions et des plugins, ce qui facilite l'adaptation de JMeter à des systèmes inhabituels ou plus anciens avec lesquels les nouveaux outils ont parfois du mal. Certains trouvent que certaines parties du logiciel semblent dépassées, mais en contrepartie, il reste stable et prévisible. Pour ceux qui comparent les différentes options et recherchent un outil capable de tester un large éventail de protocoles sans trop de difficultés, JMeter s'avère être une option pratique, au même titre que Gatling.

Faits marquants :

  • Couramment utilisé comme alternative open source à Gatling.
  • Fonctionne au niveau du protocole au lieu d'imiter un navigateur
  • Prend en charge de nombreux types d'applications et de protocoles différents.
  • Peut être étendu grâce à des plugins et des scripts
  • Fonctionne partout où Java fonctionne

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de performance
  • Tests de stress et d'évolutivité
  • Prise en charge des protocoles HTTP, API, messagerie et autres
  • Enregistrement et débogage du plan de test
  • Intégrations de pipelines CI
  • Scripts personnalisés et extensions

Contact Info :

  • Site web : jmeter.apache.org
  • Twitter : x.com/ApacheJMeter

3. K6 par Grafana

k6, développé par Grafana, est généralement l'un des premiers outils que les gens découvrent lorsqu'ils commencent à chercher une alternative à Gatling. Il est fortement orienté vers une configuration conviviale pour les développeurs, d'autant plus que le script est écrit en JavaScript, ce qui le rend familier pour de nombreuses équipes. Son objectif est de permettre aux ingénieurs d'écrire des tests sans que cela ne soit une corvée, que vous exécutiez quelque chose de simple sur votre ordinateur portable ou que vous lanciez des tests beaucoup plus lourds via leur plateforme cloud. L'outil couvre essentiellement les tests de charge, mais s'étend également à des tâches telles que les vérifications de navigateur et la surveillance synthétique, ce qui le rend utile lorsque les équipes souhaitent disposer d'une seule configuration plutôt que de jongler avec plusieurs outils.

Ce qui distingue k6 des autres alternatives à Gatling, c'est l'effort considérable qui a été déployé pour rendre le flux de travail simple et cohérent. Vous pouvez écrire un script et l'exécuter pratiquement n'importe où, ce qui élimine une grande partie des frictions habituelles. Il existe des extensions pour différents protocoles et frameworks, ainsi que des intégrations avec de nombreux outils de développement courants, ce qui permet de l'adapter à la plupart des configurations sans trop de difficultés. Les utilisateurs ont tendance à utiliser k6 lorsqu'ils recherchent une approche simple, axée sur le code, mais sans le processus JVM plus lourd associé à Gatling.

Faits marquants :

  • Option populaire lors de la comparaison des alternatives à Gatling
  • Scripts de test en JavaScript
  • Un seul script fonctionne pour les exécutions locales, distribuées et dans le cloud.
  • Prend en charge les vérifications du navigateur, les API et d'autres types de tests.
  • S'intègre aux outils courants d'ingénierie et de surveillance

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de performance
  • Test du navigateur et test de bout en bout
  • Surveillance synthétique
  • Tests de défaillance et de résilience pour les systèmes natifs du cloud
  • Tests d'infrastructure et d'évolutivité
  • Contrôles continus de régression et de fiabilité

Contact Info :

  • Site web : grafana.com
  • Courriel : info@grafana.com 
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/grafana-labs
  • Twitter : x.com/grafana
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/grafana

4. LoadForge

LoadForge est généralement utilisé lorsque les équipes recherchent une alternative à Gatling plus facile à mettre en œuvre. Au lieu de tout écrire à partir de zéro, ils offrent plusieurs façons de créer des tests, comme l'enregistrement de sessions de navigation ou le téléchargement de spécifications API. Cette configuration tend à séduire les équipes qui recherchent un outil plus guidé, en particulier lorsqu'elles ont besoin de tester des sites, des API ou des flux utilisateur complets sans passer toute la journée à écrire des scripts. Ils vous permettent également de lancer des tests à partir de votre pipeline CI, ce qui est utile lorsque vous souhaitez que les contrôles de performance s'exécutent en arrière-plan plutôt que de devenir une tâche distincte.

Ils se positionnent davantage comme une plateforme que comme un simple outil, ce qui signifie qu'ils couvrent un ensemble de domaines qui vont au-delà des tests de charge de base. Les équipes apprécient de pouvoir augmenter ou réduire l'échelle des tests sans trop se soucier de la configuration sous-jacente, et les rapports sont conçus pour aider les utilisateurs à comprendre ce qui n'a pas fonctionné sans avoir à fouiller dans les journaux. Pour tous ceux qui comparent les différentes options et recherchent une solution capable de gérer à la fois la création de tests et les tâches lourdes dans le cloud, LoadForge s'avère être une alternative pratique à Gatling.

Faits marquants :

  • Souvent utilisé comme alternative plus guidée au Gatling.
  • Permet aux équipes de créer des tests à partir d'enregistrements, de fichiers API ou de scripts Python.
  • Fonctionne pour les sites Web, les API et les flux pilotés par navigateur
  • Teste les échelles sans nécessiter de configuration d'infrastructure
  • Fournit des rapports axés sur des informations claires et lisibles.

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de résistance pour les sites Web et les API
  • Enregistrement et lecture des sessions de navigation
  • Génération de tests API à partir de spécifications
  • Intégrations CI pipeline pour les contrôles de performance automatisés
  • Exécution de tests basée sur le cloud
  • Analyse de la fiabilité et des performances

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : loadforge.com
  • Courriel : help@loadforge.com
  • Téléphone : (510) 944-1376
  • Adresse : 651 North Broad Street Middletown, DE 19709 États-Unis d'Amérique

5. Loadium

Loadium est une autre option envisagée par les équipes qui recherchent quelque chose d'un peu différent de Gatling, mais suffisamment familier pour que la courbe d'apprentissage ne soit pas trop difficile. Ils travaillent avec de nombreux outils open source, ce qui permet aux personnes qui utilisent déjà JMeter ou Gatling d'intégrer leurs scripts existants à la plateforme au lieu de repartir de zéro. Ce qui ressort généralement, c'est qu'ils essaient de rendre la création de tests moins frustrante en proposant des outils tels qu'un générateur de scripts et un enregistreur Chrome. Cela aide généralement les équipes qui souhaitent lancer rapidement des tests sans passer des heures à tout écrire à la main.

Ils offrent également aux équipes la possibilité d'effectuer des tests dans le cloud ou sur leur propre configuration, ce qui est utile lorsque vous disposez de différents environnements ou exigences de sécurité. Leur tableau de bord vise à faciliter la lecture des résultats, en particulier lorsque vous essayez de repérer les goulots d'étranglement. Pour tous ceux qui comparent les outils et recherchent une solution à la fois open source et plus pratique, Loadium s'avère être une alternative raisonnable à Gatling.

Faits marquants :

  • Souvent choisi comme alternative plus flexible au Gatling
  • Prend en charge les outils open source tels que JMeter, Gatling et Selenium.
  • Comprend un générateur de scripts sans code et des outils d'enregistrement.
  • Peut exécuter des tests dans le cloud ou sur site
  • Le reporting est conçu pour aider les équipes à repérer rapidement les problèmes de performance.

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de résistance pour les applications Web et les API
  • Création de scripts à l'aide d'enregistreurs et d'outils sans code
  • Exécution de scripts open source
  • Génération de charge dans le cloud et sur site
  • Intégrations de pipelines CI
  • Analyse des performances et dépannage

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : loadium.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/loadium
  • Twitter : x.com/loadiumcom
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/loadiumcom

6. BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter est l'un des outils auxquels les équipes se tournent lorsqu'elles dépassent les capacités de Gatling ou qu'elles recherchent simplement un outil capable de couvrir davantage d'étapes du processus de test en un seul endroit. Il adopte une approche globale, combinant les tests de performance avec des éléments tels que les vérifications d'API et les tests fonctionnels, afin que les équipes puissent tout gérer à partir d'une seule configuration au lieu de jongler entre plusieurs outils. Comme il fonctionne avec des technologies open source telles que JMeter et Gatling lui-même, BlazeMeter est souvent utilisé pour exécuter des versions plus importantes ou mieux organisées des tests déjà existants.

Ils proposent également la virtualisation des services et d'autres fonctionnalités utiles lorsqu'une équipe doit tester des systèmes qui reposent sur des composants indisponibles ou instables. La plateforme vise à simplifier le travail quotidien lié aux tests, en particulier lorsque les entreprises souhaitent intégrer des tests de charge dans leurs pipelines CI. Pour ceux qui comparent les différentes options et recherchent une solution prenant en charge à la fois les scripts open source et les workflows plus structurés, BlazeMeter s'avère être une alternative pratique à Gatling.

Faits marquants :

  • Choix courant pour les équipes qui recherchent des alternatives à Gatling
  • Fonctionne avec des outils open source tels que JMeter, Gatling et Selenium.
  • Couvre les tests de performance, d'API et fonctionnels dans une seule configuration.
  • Offre une virtualisation des services pour tester des systèmes complexes.
  • Conçu pour s'intégrer dans les flux de travail CI

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de performance
  • Test et surveillance des API
  • Essais fonctionnels
  • Virtualisation des services
  • Assistance à l'automatisation des tests
  • Intégrations de pipelines CI

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.blazemeter.com

7. PFLB

PFLB est une autre option envisagée par les équipes qui recherchent une solution plus structurée que Gatling, mais toujours conviviale pour les développeurs. Elle vise principalement à aider les utilisateurs à exécuter des tests de charge dans le cloud sans avoir à gérer la configuration sous-jacente. La plupart des équipes qui choisissent PFLB souhaitent généralement disposer d'un moyen plus simple de gérer des tests plus importants ou de réutiliser des éléments dont elles disposent déjà, tels que des scripts JMeter ou des collections Postman. Leur plateforme s'appuie sur l'automatisation et l'IA pour expliquer les résultats, ce qui est utile lorsque les équipes n'ont pas le temps d'examiner manuellement les rapports.

Ils essaient également de répondre à différents besoins en matière de tests en un seul endroit, afin que les ingénieurs de performance, les équipes d'assurance qualité et les développeurs DevOps puissent utiliser le même outil au lieu d'en jongler plusieurs. Une grande partie de leur offre vise à faciliter les tests répétitifs, en particulier lorsqu'ils sont exécutés directement à partir de l'intégration continue (CI). Pour ceux qui comparent les alternatives à Gatling et recherchent une solution capable de gérer les tâches lourdes tout en prenant en charge les workflows open source, PFLB s'avère être un choix très approprié.

Faits marquants :

  • Considéré par les équipes comme une alternative plus automatisée à Gatling
  • Fonctionne avec les fichiers JMeter, Postman et HAR
  • Exécution de charges basée sur le cloud avec des informations assistées par l'IA
  • Conçu pour des tests répétés et une utilisation CI
  • Aide les équipes à comprendre les problèmes de performance sans analyse manuelle approfondie.

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de performance
  • Tests API, Web et gRPC
  • Génération de charge basée sur le cloud
  • Analyse automatisée des tests grâce à l'IA
  • Intégrations de pipelines CI
  • Assistance professionnelle pour les tests de performance

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : pflb.us
  • Courriel : sales@pflb.us
  • Téléphone : +14084182552
  • Adresse : 2810 N Church St, PMB 729811, Wilmington, Delaware 19802-4447, États-Unis
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/pflb
  • Twitter : x.com/pflb22

8. OctoPerf

OctoPerf est souvent envisagé par les équipes qui recherchent une alternative à Gatling, tout en conservant une interface familière, mais en supprimant une grande partie de la charge liée à la gestion de l'infrastructure de tests de charge. L'accent est mis sur la mise à disposition des utilisateurs d'un moyen basé sur un navigateur pour créer et exécuter des tests, ce qui séduit les équipes qui recherchent une solution plus simple à utiliser qu'un workflow entièrement basé sur des scripts. OctoPerf prenant en charge des outils tels que JMeter en arrière-plan, les utilisateurs peuvent réutiliser ce dont ils disposent déjà tout en bénéficiant d'une interface plus fluide et d'une configuration moins fastidieuse.

Ils aident également les équipes à structurer les tests pour les applications web, les API et les flux utilisateur plus complexes sans les contraindre à adopter un style de test unique. De nombreuses équipes utilisent OctoPerf lorsqu'elles souhaitent faire évoluer rapidement leurs tests ou collaborer sans avoir à gérer des environnements locaux. Pour tous ceux qui comparent les plateformes de tests de charge et recherchent un compromis entre la flexibilité de l'open source et une expérience cloud plus fluide, OctoPerf est généralement un bon choix.

Faits marquants :

  • Souvent utilisé comme alternative plus simple au Gatling.
  • Fournit une interface basée sur un navigateur pour créer et exécuter des tests.
  • Prend en charge les projets JMeter pour faciliter la migration
  • Teste les échelles dans le cloud sans configuration locale
  • Aide les équipes à collaborer sur des scénarios de performance

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de performance
  • Tests d'API et d'applications web
  • Génération de charge basée sur le cloud
  • Importation et exécution du projet JMeter
  • Rapport et analyse des résultats des tests

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : octoperf.com
  • Courriel : contact@octoperf.com
  • Téléphone : +334 42 84 12 59
  • Adresse : Avantages Buro, ZI Les Paluds, 276 Avenue du Douard, 13400 Aubagne, France
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/octoperf

9. Artillerie

Artillery est l'un des outils auxquels les gens se tournent lorsqu'ils recherchent une solution plus légère et plus flexible que Gatling, mais suffisamment puissante pour gérer de véritables tests de charge. Ils accordent une grande importance aux workflows des développeurs, ce qui signifie que les équipes peuvent écrire des tests de la même manière qu'elles écrivent le code de leurs applications. Comme Artillery prend en charge à la fois les tests basés sur API et sur navigateur, il convient parfaitement aux équipes qui ont besoin de vérifier plus que les seules performances backend. Leur plateforme combine également des exécutions locales et des exécutions dans le cloud, ce qui permet aux équipes de commencer modestement et de s'adapter uniquement lorsque cela est nécessaire.

Ils s'efforcent également de tout regrouper au même endroit, des tests Playwright E2E aux tests de charge, en passant par la surveillance précoce. De nombreuses équipes apprécient de pouvoir réutiliser les tests Playwright existants ou d'exécuter des tests de navigateur distribués sans avoir à gérer leur propre infrastructure. Pour tous ceux qui comparent les alternatives à Gatling et recherchent une configuration moderne et conviviale, Artillery s'avère souvent être la solution idéale.

Faits marquants :

  • Souvent choisi comme alternative plus flexible et plus conviviale à Gatling
  • Prend en charge les tests de charge basés sur API, GraphQL, WebSocket et navigateur.
  • Fonctionne avec les tests Playwright pour les scénarios de bout en bout ou les scénarios exigeants pour le navigateur.
  • Permet aux équipes d'exécuter des tests localement ou avec des runners cloud.
  • S'intègre facilement aux pipelines CI et aux outils de surveillance

Services :

  • Tests de charge et de performance
  • Test de navigateur basé sur un script
  • Test de charge distribué dans le cloud
  • Surveillance synthétique des parcours clés des utilisateurs
  • Intégrations CI et flux de travail des développeurs
  • Outils de reporting et de débogage pour l'analyse des tests

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.artillery.io
  • Courriel : support@artillery.io
  • Adresse : 169 Madison Avenue, #2096, New York, NY 10016 États-Unis
  • Twitter : x.com/artilleryio

10. Sauterelle

Locust est l'un de ces outils que les gens évoquent lorsqu'ils recherchent une alternative à Gatling qui reste proche du codage réel au lieu de les pousser vers une interface utilisateur lourde. L'idée générale repose sur la définition du comportement des utilisateurs en Python, ce qui semble naturel pour les équipes qui préfèrent écrire des tests de la même manière qu'elles écrivent le reste de leur logique backend. Il simplifie délibérément les choses, vous permettant de décrire ce que font les utilisateurs, puis de le reproduire sur autant de machines que nécessaire.

Ils s'appuient également sur une configuration propre, basée sur des scripts, plutôt que sur des couches de fichiers de configuration ou des éditeurs complexes. C'est pourquoi les équipes se tournent souvent vers Locust lorsqu'elles recherchent un outil de test de charge qui ne les gêne pas, mais qui permet néanmoins de gérer des charges de travail importantes. Il fonctionne bien pour les API et les applications web, et comme tout est codé, il est facile à versionner, à partager et à automatiser. Pour tous ceux qui comparent les alternatives à Gatling et recherchent un outil simple et convivial pour les développeurs, Locust est tout naturellement la solution idéale.

Faits marquants :

  • Souvent choisi comme alternative simple et basée sur du code à Gatling.
  • Les tests sont écrits en Python simple.
  • Prend en charge les tests distribués sur plusieurs machines
  • Convient parfaitement aux tests de charge API et Web
  • Open source avec une communauté active

Services :

  • Création de tests de charge basés sur Python
  • Tests d'API et d'applications web
  • Génération de charge distribuée
  • Exécution de tests basée sur l'interface CLI
  • Option hébergée disponible via Locust.cloud
  • Soutien à la communauté et aux contributeurs

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : locust.io
  • Twitter : x.com/locustio

11. BrowserStack

BrowserStack est généralement connu pour ses tests multi-navigateurs et multi-appareils, mais il propose désormais également des tests de charge, ce qui le place sur la liste des équipes comparant les alternatives à Gatling. Son approche consiste à exécuter la charge de manière plus réaliste, basée sur le navigateur, afin que les équipes puissent voir comment le front-end et le back-end se comportent sous pression. Cela fonctionne bien pour tous ceux qui utilisent déjà BrowserStack pour les tests fonctionnels et qui souhaitent réutiliser ces scripts plutôt que d'en écrire un tout nouveau ensemble uniquement pour la charge.

Ils restent également très discrets en matière d'infrastructure. Les équipes peuvent effectuer des tests depuis différentes régions, observer les métriques en temps réel et déboguer depuis un seul endroit sans avoir à démarrer des machines ou à installer quoi que ce soit. C'est le type de configuration qui plaît aux personnes qui recherchent un outil simple à utiliser, mais qui souhaitent tout de même obtenir des informations pertinentes. Pour ceux qui comparent Gatling à des plateformes cloud axées sur la facilité d'utilisation, BrowserStack entre souvent dans cette catégorie.

Faits marquants :

  • Considéré par les équipes comme une alternative plus simple et orientée navigateur à Gatling.
  • Utilise les scripts de test fonctionnel existants pour les tests de charge.
  • Simule simultanément la charge frontale et la charge arrière.
  • Infrastructure entièrement gérée, aucune configuration requise
  • Prend en charge les tests de charge dans plusieurs régions

Services :

  • Test de charge basé sur un navigateur
  • Test de charge de l'API
  • Surveillance des performances en temps réel
  • Outils unifiés de reporting et de débogage
  • Intégrations de pipelines CI
  • Outils de test multi-navigateurs et multi-appareils

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.browserstack.com
  • Courriel : support@browserstack.com
  • Téléphone : +1 (409) 230-0346
  • Adresse : 4512, Suite # 100, Legacy Drive, Plano TX 75024 États-Unis
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/browserstack
  • Twitter : x.com/browserstack
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/browserstack
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/pages/BrowserStack

Conclusion

En examinant toutes ces alternatives à Gatling, on constate que les équipes ont désormais beaucoup plus de latitude pour choisir un outil qui correspond réellement à leur façon de travailler. Certains outils privilégient les tests basés sur le code, d'autres simplifient la configuration grâce à des plateformes cloud, et quelques-uns tentent de tout regrouper au même endroit afin que vous n'ayez pas à jongler entre les scripts, les rapports et l'infrastructure.

Si vous ne savez pas par où commencer, essayer une ou deux options avec un petit test vous en apprendra généralement plus qu'un long tableau comparatif. Chaque équipe a ses propres particularités, et le bon outil est généralement celui qui vous semble le moins fastidieux et que vous n'hésiterez pas à utiliser chaque semaine. Une fois que vous aurez trouvé celui qui vous convient, l'ensemble du processus de test de performance deviendra beaucoup moins pénible.

 

Les meilleures alternatives à Nagios pour une supervision informatique fiable

Nagios existe depuis toujours, et de nombreuses équipes l'utilisent encore. Mais comme les systèmes sont de plus en plus distribués et bruyants, de nombreuses entreprises se tournent vers des outils un peu plus flexibles et plus faciles à utiliser au quotidien. La bonne nouvelle est que l'espace de supervision s'est beaucoup développé et qu'il existe maintenant plusieurs plateformes solides qui gèrent les alertes, les logs et les données de performance sans la lourdeur de l'installation pour laquelle Nagios est connu.

Dans ce guide, nous allons passer en revue quelques-unes des options les plus performantes du marché actuel. Il s'agit d'entreprises qui conçoivent des outils de surveillance adaptés au type d'environnement auquel la plupart des équipes sont confrontées aujourd'hui : désordonné, changeant rapidement et rempli de différents services qui doivent tous rester synchronisés. L'objectif ici n'est pas de couronner un vainqueur, mais de donner un aperçu clair de ce qui se fait afin que vous puissiez choisir quelque chose qui s'adapte à la façon dont votre équipe travaille, et non l'inverse.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst emprunte une voie peu conventionnelle par rapport aux outils de surveillance classiques tels que Nagios. Au lieu de demander aux équipes de câbler l'infrastructure, d'écrire Terraform ou de coller des plugins, ils inversent l'ensemble du flux de travail. Leur idée est assez simple : les développeurs doivent décrire les besoins de leur application, et le système doit s'occuper de l'infrastructure et des garde-fous. Cela inclut la surveillance, la journalisation, les alertes et toutes les choses qui sont normalement ajoutées plus tard. Cette approche séduit les équipes qui veulent avancer rapidement sans se perdre dans la configuration du cloud ou les files d'attente DevOps.

Ils s'appuient également sur la cohérence et la sécurité. Une fois que les exigences d'une application sont définies, AppFirst gère le provisionnement sur AWS, Azure ou GCP en utilisant les pratiques recommandées par le fournisseur. Les équipes n'ont pas à gérer les règles de mise en réseau ou les politiques IAM. La partie surveillance est intégrée, de sorte que personne n'a à se démener pour installer des agents ou intégrer des tableaux de bord après coup. Pour les équipes qui explorent les alternatives à Nagios, AppFirst s'inscrit dans le tableau comme un moyen d'obtenir une observabilité sans les frais généraux d'installation habituels.

Faits marquants :

  • Approche de l'infrastructure axée sur les applications
  • Journalisation, surveillance et alerte intégrées
  • Application automatique des meilleures pratiques en matière d'informatique dématérialisée
  • Fonctionne sur AWS, Azure et GCP
  • Conçu pour les équipes qui souhaitent réduire les goulets d'étranglement DevOps

Services :

  • Mise à disposition automatisée de l'infrastructure
  • Surveillance et alerte intégrées
  • Outils d'audit et de conformité centralisés
  • Visibilité des coûts par application ou environnement
  • Prise en charge des déploiements SaaS ou auto-hébergés
  • Simplification du flux de travail pour les équipes multi-nuages

Contact Info :

2. Icinga

Icinga se trouve dans une position intéressante lorsque les gens commencent à chercher des alternatives à Nagios. Ils ont commencé il y a des années comme un fork de Nagios, mais au fil du temps ils ont évolué bien au-delà de ces racines. Aujourd'hui, ils gèrent une plateforme de surveillance qui semble plus en phase avec la façon dont les systèmes modernes se comportent. Au lieu de s'appuyer sur d'anciens flux de travail, ils ont construit une architecture qui s'adapte aux équipes qui jonglent avec des installations dans le nuage, des services distribués ou des environnements qui changent plus vite qu'on ne veut bien l'admettre. L'objectif est de donner aux équipes une meilleure visibilité sans que chaque mise à jour ou modification de la configuration ne soit perçue comme une corvée.

Ils s'appuient également sur les intégrations et l'automatisation, ce que de nombreux utilisateurs de Nagios finissent par désirer. Plutôt que d'attendre des gens qu'ils gèrent d'interminables fichiers textes, Icinga offre des outils qui réduisent la charge manuelle. Son écosystème comprend des tableaux de bord, des modules de reporting et des extensions qui aident les équipes à rester au fait des alertes sans se noyer dans le bruit. Même si le noyau reste open source, Icinga propose une assistance et des conseils aux entreprises qui souhaitent s'affranchir en douceur de leurs anciennes habitudes de surveillance.

Faits marquants :

  • Positionné comme une alternative pratique à Nagios
  • A l'origine, il s'agissait d'une fourche, mais elle a été entièrement reconstruite pour devenir un système de surveillance moderne.
  • Gestion des environnements distribués ou mixtes sans complexité supplémentaire
  • Automatisation aisée grâce à un large éventail d'intégrations
  • Open source avec soutien de la communauté et aide optionnelle de l'entreprise

Services :

  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure et des services
  • Surveillance du réseau et de Kubernetes
  • Gestion des alertes et des notifications
  • Intégrations avec Prometheus, Grafana, Elastic, Ansible, etc.
  • Options de conseil, de formation et d'assistance

Informations sur le contact

  • Site web : icinga.com
  • Courriel : info@icinga.com
  • Téléphone : +49 911 9288555 +49 911 9288555
  • Adresse : Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 90429 Nuremberg, Allemagne
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/icinga
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/icinga

zabbix

3. Zabbix

Zabbix est l'un des noms qui revient le plus souvent lorsque les équipes commencent à chercher des alternatives à Nagios. Il s'agit d'une plateforme de surveillance open source qui tente de tout centraliser, qu'il s'agisse de serveurs, d'équipements réseau, de charges de travail en nuage ou d'un mélange de tous ces éléments. Leur configuration est suffisamment flexible pour que les entreprises l'utilisent dans toutes sortes d'environnements, des systèmes traditionnels sur site aux grandes infrastructures distribuées. L'objectif est de donner aux utilisateurs une vision claire de ce qui se passe dans leur pile de données, sans les contraindre à une méthode de travail spécifique.

Ils proposent également différentes façons d'utiliser leur plateforme, ce qui est pratique pour les équipes qui préfèrent un contrôle total ou qui veulent simplement quelque chose d'hébergé. Avec l'option sur site, les utilisateurs conservent tout dans leur propre environnement. Pour ceux qui souhaitent moins de maintenance, il existe une version cloud où Zabbix s'occupe de l'hébergement et de la mise à l'échelle. Zabbix permet également des déploiements sur AWS, Azure et d'autres plateformes en nuage. Parallèlement au produit, Zabbix propose des services de formation, d'assistance et de conseil aux équipes qui souhaitent mettre les choses en place correctement ou améliorer ce qu'elles ont déjà.

Faits marquants :

  • Plate-forme de surveillance open source utilisée dans de nombreux secteurs d'activité
  • Fonctionne pour les installations sur site, en nuage et hybrides
  • Offre des options d'hébergement autonome et de gestion complète de l'informatique en nuage
  • Architecture flexible adaptée aux environnements mixtes
  • Une équipe mondiale et un réseau de partenaires qui apportent leur soutien

Services :

  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure et du réseau
  • Collecte de journaux et de données métriques
  • Flux d'alertes et d'incidents
  • Intégrations avec des services en nuage et des outils tiers
  • Assistance, conseil et formation
  • Assistance au déploiement, à la mise à niveau et à la migration

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.zabbix.com
  • Courriel : sales@zabbix.com
  • Téléphone : +18774922249
  • Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse : Adresse Adresse : Adresse : 211 E 43rd Street, Suite 7-100, New York, NY 10017, USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/zabbix
  • Twitter : x.com/zabbix
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/zabbix

prométhée

4. Prométhée

Prometheus apparaît souvent lorsque les équipes commencent à s'éloigner des outils classiques comme Nagios pour se tourner vers des configurations plus lourdes. Prometheus se concentre presque entièrement sur les métriques, ce qui rend son approche très différente de l'ancien style de surveillance. Au lieu de s'appuyer sur des plugins pour tout, ils collectent des données de séries temporelles et laissent les utilisateurs les découper et les interroger comme ils le souhaitent. Leur système s'adapte bien aux endroits où les conteneurs, les microservices et les environnements en évolution rapide sont la norme. Ils gardent les choses simples à faire fonctionner, mais pas de manière à limiter ce que les gens peuvent faire avec.

Ils s'appuient également sur un modèle basé sur la traction et offrent une vaste collection d'intégrations, de sorte que l'obtention de données à partir de systèmes existants n'est généralement pas un problème. Prometheus s'associe facilement à des outils tels que Grafana, et leur configuration d'alerte fonctionne avec le même langage de requête, ce qui permet de conserver une certaine cohérence. Prometheus reste entièrement open source et axé sur la communauté, et sa position au sein de la CNCF signifie qu'il continue d'évoluer en même temps que le reste du monde cloud native.

Faits marquants :

  • Surveillance axée sur les mesures et conçue pour les environnements natifs du cloud
  • Fonctionne bien avec Kubernetes et les configurations basées sur les conteneurs.
  • Modèle basé sur la traction avec de nombreuses intégrations
  • Utilise PromQL pour les requêtes et les alertes
  • Entièrement open source et maintenu par la communauté

Services :

  • Collecte et stockage de données métriques
  • Alertes avec Alertmanager
  • Intégrations avec des outils de cloud, de conteneurs et d'infrastructure
  • Bibliothèques d'instrumentation pour les principaux langages
  • Documentation, soutien communautaire et ressources de formation

Contact Info :

  • Site web : prometheus.io

5. Paessler

Paessler est la société à l'origine de PRTG, qui apparaît souvent lorsque les équipes commencent à comparer Nagios à quelque chose de plus convivial. Au lieu de s'appuyer sur des configurations manuelles lourdes, ils essaient d'offrir une configuration de surveillance que les gens peuvent faire fonctionner sans passer des jours à trier des fichiers texte. Leur outil couvre la plupart des besoins de supervision habituels en un seul endroit, de sorte que les équipes n'ont pas besoin d'assembler un tas de modules complémentaires juste pour avoir une visibilité sur leur réseau, leurs serveurs ou leurs applications. L'objectif est d'obtenir un outil prévisible et facile à maintenir, ce qui représente un grand changement par rapport à l'approche classique qui consiste à tout faire soi-même.

Ils permettent également aux utilisateurs de choisir la manière dont ils souhaitent déployer les choses. Certaines équipes installent PRTG sur leur propre infrastructure, tandis que d'autres optent pour la version hébergée afin de ne pas avoir à l'exploiter elles-mêmes. Quoi qu'il en soit, Paessler s'efforce de simplifier l'installation et l'utilisation quotidienne. En plus du produit, la société propose une assistance, des conseils et des formations aux entreprises qui souhaitent obtenir une aide supplémentaire. L'approche globale de Paessler consiste moins à être tape-à-l'œil qu'à offrir aux utilisateurs un outil qui s'intègre dans leur travail de surveillance quotidien sans leur causer de maux de tête constants.

Faits marquants :

  • Connu pour PRTG, un outil de surveillance souvent comparé à Nagios
  • L'accent est mis sur la facilité d'installation et d'utilisation au quotidien
  • Offre des options de déploiement en auto-hébergement et en nuage
  • Couvre la surveillance du réseau, des serveurs, des applications et du cloud en un seul endroit.
  • Soutien et formation disponibles pour les équipes qui souhaitent être guidées

Services :

  • Surveillance du réseau et de l'infrastructure
  • Surveillance des serveurs et des applications
  • Surveillance de l'environnement virtuel et de l'informatique en nuage
  • Tableaux de bord, alertes et outils de visualisation
  • Services de conseil, d'assistance et de formation

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.paessler.com
  • Courriel : info@paessler.com
  • Téléphone : +49 911 93775-0
  • Adresse : Thurn-und-Taxis-Str. 14, 90411 Nuremberg Allemagne
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/paessler-gmbh
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/paessler.gmbh

6. SolarWinds

SolarWinds est l'une de ces sociétés que l'on consulte généralement lorsqu'on veut quelque chose d'un peu plus guidé que Nagios, mais suffisamment familier pour que le changement ne soit pas douloureux. Leurs outils de surveillance tendent vers un style "plug and play", ce qui est un grand changement pour les équipes habituées à se débattre avec des configurations basées sur du texte. Leur objectif est d'aider les utilisateurs à obtenir une visibilité sur les serveurs, les applications et les problèmes généraux de performance sans avoir à tout construire à partir de zéro. Beaucoup de leurs produits sont construits de manière à permettre aux équipes de réutiliser les scripts Nagios sur lesquels elles s'appuient déjà, de sorte qu'elles n'ont pas l'impression de repartir à zéro.

Ils s'efforcent également de couvrir un large éventail d'environnements, depuis les simples installations sur site jusqu'aux réseaux plus étendus avec des services en nuage. Leurs outils sont généralement accompagnés de tableaux de bord, de modèles et de fonctions qui orientent les utilisateurs dans la bonne direction au lieu de les laisser se débrouiller avec tous les détails. En outre, ils proposent une assistance et des ressources aux équipes qui souhaitent obtenir de l'aide pour la migration ou le dépannage quotidien. Dans l'ensemble, leur approche consiste davantage à réduire les tâches lourdes et à fournir aux utilisateurs une configuration de surveillance qui fonctionne dès la sortie de l'emballage.

Faits marquants :

  • Offre des outils de surveillance souvent utilisés en remplacement de Nagios
  • Prise en charge de l'utilisation de scripts Nagios existants au sein de leur plateforme
  • L'accent est mis sur une installation plus rapide et un fonctionnement quotidien plus facile.
  • Tableaux de bord et modèles intégrés pour les applications courantes
  • Fonctionne dans des environnements sur site, virtuels et en nuage.

Services :

  • Surveillance des serveurs et des applications
  • Surveillance du réseau et de l'infrastructure
  • Alertes, tableaux de bord et analyse des performances
  • Prise en charge des scripts personnalisés et des intégrations
  • Conseil et assistance pour la migration et l'installation

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.solarwinds.com
  • Courriel : sales@solarwinds.com
  • Téléphone : +1-512-682-9300
  • Adresse : 7171 Southwest Parkway Bldg 400 Austin, Texas 78735 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/solarwinds
  • Twitter : x.com/solarwinds
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/solarwindsinc
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/SolarWinds

7. Dynatrace

Dynatrace adopte un angle assez différent par rapport aux anciens outils de supervision que les gens associent généralement à Nagios. Au lieu de s'appuyer sur des plugins et des configurations manuelles, ils s'appuient fortement sur l'observabilité et l'automatisation, en essayant de donner aux équipes une image plus claire de tout ce qui se passe dans leurs systèmes sans les obliger à courir après les logs toute la journée. Ils travaillent avec des environnements vastes et occupés où les choses changent constamment, de sorte que leur plate-forme est construite autour de la collecte de données, de l'ajout de contexte et de l'utilisation de l'IA pour mettre en évidence ce qui est réellement important. Il s'agit moins de surveiller les contrôles individuels que de comprendre la situation dans son ensemble.

Ils offrent également un large éventail de fonctionnalités qui couvrent les applications, l'infrastructure, l'expérience numérique, la sécurité et même les mesures au niveau de l'entreprise. Tout cela fonctionne sur une seule plateforme, ce qui permet aux équipes d'éviter de jongler avec plusieurs outils pour comprendre un problème. Dynatrace pousse aussi beaucoup à l'automatisation, laissant son système gérer les tâches de routine pour que les équipes puissent se concentrer sur les choses qui nécessitent une réelle prise de décision. Bien qu'il s'agisse d'une configuration plus avancée que la surveillance traditionnelle, Dynatrace s'efforce de l'intégrer dans le travail quotidien plutôt que de créer un surcroît de travail.

Faits marquants :

  • L'accent est mis sur l'observabilité plutôt que sur le contrôle traditionnel.
  • Utilise l'IA pour trouver les problèmes et réduire les investigations manuelles
  • Rassemble les données relatives aux applications, à l'infrastructure, aux journaux et à l'expérience des utilisateurs au sein d'une seule et même plateforme.
  • Prise en charge d'environnements vastes et en évolution rapide
  • Intégration avec les principales plates-formes en nuage et les outils modernes

Services :

  • Observabilité des applications et de l'infrastructure
  • Analyse des journaux et surveillance des performances
  • Aperçu de l'expérience numérique
  • Automatisation des tâches opérationnelles courantes
  • Sécurité et visibilité des menaces
  • Services d'assistance, de formation et de mise en œuvre

Contact Info :

  • Site web : www.dynatrace.com
  • Courriel : sales@dynatrace.com
  • Téléphone : +1.650.436.6700
  • Adresse : 401 Castro Street, Second Floor Mountain View, CA, 94041 États-Unis d'Amérique
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/dynatrace
  • Twitter : x.com/Dynatrace
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/dynatrace
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Dynatrace

8. ManageEngine

ManageEngine est le groupe derrière OpManager, que beaucoup d'équipes finissent par regarder quand ils veulent quelque chose d'un peu plus fluide et moins pratique que Nagios. L'objectif est d'offrir aux utilisateurs une configuration de surveillance qui ne nécessite pas l'assemblage d'une douzaine de plugins avant que quelque chose d'utile n'apparaisse. Leur plateforme couvre les réseaux, les serveurs, le stockage, les machines virtuelles et tous les domaines habituels qui ont tendance à causer des maux de tête, mais ils essaient de tout présenter d'une manière qui semble plus organisée et plus facile à gérer au quotidien. Elle est conçue pour les environnements où les choses changent souvent et où les gens n'ont pas le temps de s'occuper des configurations.

Ils intègrent également des fonctions d'automatisation et d'intelligence artificielle afin de réduire les tâches répétitives. Au lieu de laisser les utilisateurs comprendre manuellement chaque règle ou seuil, OpManager prend en charge une grande partie des tâches routinières en arrière-plan. L'entreprise propose différents outils pour les journaux, la gestion de la configuration et l'analyse des performances, et tous ces outils sont reliés au même écosystème afin que les équipes n'aient pas à jongler avec de multiples tableaux de bord. Globalement, leur approche consiste à réduire les frictions et à donner aux administrateurs un moyen de gérer les problèmes avant qu'ils ne deviennent incontrôlables.

Faits marquants :

  • Connu pour OpManager, souvent utilisé comme alternative à Nagios
  • Couvre les réseaux, les serveurs, le stockage et les environnements virtuels dans un seul outil.
  • Automatisation intégrée pour réduire les tâches manuelles de contrôle
  • Offre des modules supplémentaires pour les journaux, la configuration et l'analyse du trafic
  • Conçu pour les environnements qui changent fréquemment

Services :

  • Surveillance du réseau et des serveurs
  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure virtuelle et du stockage
  • Gestion des journaux et de la configuration
  • Alertes, tableaux de bord et rapports
  • Soutien, formation et aide au déploiement

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.manageengine.com
  • Courriel : sales@manageengine.com
  • Téléphone : +1 877 834 4428
  • Adresse : 4141 Hacienda Drive Pleasanton CA 94588 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/showcase/manageengine-it-operations-management
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/manageengine_itom

9. Datadog

Datadog est souvent évoqué lorsque les équipes veulent quelque chose qui va au-delà de la surveillance traditionnelle et qui leur donne une vision plus claire de tout ce qui se passe dans leur pile. Au lieu de se concentrer sur un seul élément d'infrastructure à la fois, Datadog rassemble les métriques, les journaux, les traces et les données de sécurité afin que les équipes puissent voir comment les choses se connectent. Elle est conçue pour les configurations où les services se déplacent constamment et où les gens ont besoin de réponses rapides sans avoir à fouiller dans un tas d'outils distincts. La plateforme s'appuie fortement sur les tableaux de bord, l'automatisation et l'intelligence artificielle, ce qui permet d'éliminer une grande partie du bruit qui apparaît généralement dans les environnements plus vastes.

Ils s'intègrent également à presque tous les principaux systèmes de cloud et de conteneurs, de sorte qu'il n'est généralement pas compliqué d'obtenir des données. Les équipes utilisent Datadog lorsqu'elles souhaitent un dépannage plus fluide, en particulier lorsque les performances, les coûts et la fiabilité doivent être pris en compte simultanément. Bien que la plateforme soit très performante, les flux de travail doivent rester pratiques afin que les utilisateurs puissent passer plus de temps à comprendre les problèmes plutôt qu'à assembler des pipelines. Pour tous ceux qui s'éloignent de Nagios et s'orientent vers un travail plus axé sur le cloud, Datadog apparaît souvent comme une étape naturelle.

Faits marquants :

  • Combine les mesures, les journaux, les traces et les données de sécurité en un seul endroit.
  • Fonctionne bien pour les environnements cloud, de conteneurs et sans serveur.
  • Offre des informations basées sur l'IA pour accélérer le dépannage
  • S'intègre à un large éventail d'outils et de services
  • Conçu pour les systèmes distribués à évolution rapide

Services :

  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure et des applications
  • Gestion et analyse des journaux
  • Surveillance de la sécurité et détection des menaces
  • Surveillance de l'utilisateur réel et de l'utilisateur synthétique
  • Automatisation, tableaux de bord et outils de gestion des incidents
  • Soutien, formation et aide à la mise en œuvre

Contact Info :

  • Site web : www.datadoghq.com
  • Courriel : info@datadoghq.com
  • Téléphone : 866 329-4466
  • Adresse : 620 8th Ave 45th Floor New York, NY 10018 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/datadog
  • Twitter : x.com/datadoghq
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/datadoghq
  • App Store : apps.apple.com/app/datadog
  • Google Play : play.google.com/store/apps/datadog.app

10. Logiciels intermédiaires

Middleware est un nom plus récent dans le domaine de la surveillance, mais il aborde le problème d'une manière qui correspond à ce que beaucoup d'équipes veulent après avoir dépassé Nagios. Au lieu de jongler avec des outils distincts pour les mesures, les journaux et les traces, ils rassemblent tout en un seul endroit afin que les gens puissent réellement voir comment les problèmes se connectent. Leur plateforme est conçue pour gérer la plupart des configurations modernes, qu'il s'agisse de charges de travail dans le nuage, de conteneurs ou d'un mélange de systèmes on prem qui n'ont pas encore évolué. L'idée est de simplifier les parties bruyantes de la surveillance et de faire en sorte que le dépannage ne ressemble plus à une chasse dans l'obscurité.

Ils donnent également aux utilisateurs un certain contrôle sur les données collectées, ce qui permet de garder les choses gérables et d'éviter de noyer les équipes sous des informations dont elles n'ont pas besoin. Les alertes, les tableaux de bord et la corrélation sont intégrés, de sorte que les flux de travail de base ne nécessitent pas d'ajouts supplémentaires. L'objectif de Middleware est d'offrir une solution facile à mettre en œuvre, sans sacrifier la flexibilité au fur et à mesure que les environnements se développent. Même si elle est encore en train de se faire un nom, la plateforme a une direction claire et convient bien aux équipes qui souhaitent une alternative plus propre et plus unifiée aux outils traditionnels.

Faits marquants :

  • Réunit les mesures, les journaux et les traces au sein d'une même plateforme
  • Visibilité en temps réel sur les serveurs, les conteneurs, les VM et les services cloud.
  • Corrélation en un clic pour accélérer le dépannage
  • Tableaux de bord personnalisés et alertes
  • Prise en charge des environnements on prem, cloud et hybrides

Services :

  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure et des applications
  • Surveillance de Kubernetes avec des tableaux de bord intégrés.
  • Collecte de journaux et de traces
  • Flux d'alertes et d'incidents
  • Assistance à la mise en place et soutien à la plateforme

Contact Info :

  • Site web : middleware.io
  • Courriel : hello@middleware.io
  • Adresse : 133, Kearny St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA 94108
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/middleware-labs
  • Twitter : x.com/middleware_labs
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/middlewarelabs

11. NinjaOne

NinjaOne se situe dans un coin légèrement différent du monde de la surveillance, principalement parce qu'il se concentre sur les terminaux et les opérations informatiques quotidiennes plutôt que sur les contrôles classiques de l'infrastructure. Mais beaucoup d'équipes cherchant à remplacer Nagios finissent par les considérer de toute façon, surtout si leurs plus gros problèmes viennent de la gestion des ordinateurs portables, des serveurs et des appareils distants plutôt que de la surveillance en profondeur du réseau. Leur plateforme est conçue pour tout garder en un seul endroit afin que les équipes informatiques puissent détecter les problèmes rapidement, patcher les systèmes rapidement et garder une trace de ce qui se passe à travers un mélange désordonné d'environnements locaux et distants.

Ils s'appuient fortement sur l'automatisation, ce qui permet aux équipes d'éviter de se retrouver coincées à faire les mêmes tâches répétitives encore et encore. NinjaOne associe également la surveillance à des outils de sauvegarde, de correction, d'accès à distance et de documentation, ce qui donne l'impression qu'il s'agit davantage d'un centre opérationnel complet que d'un complément de surveillance. Pour les équipes qui ont besoin de quelque chose de pratique et de facile à utiliser, en particulier dans les environnements de travail distribués ou hybrides, leur approche tend à s'adapter assez naturellement.

Faits marquants :

  • L'accent est mis sur la surveillance des points d'extrémité et des appareils plutôt que sur les contrôles traditionnels des nœuds.
  • Automatisations intégrées pour réduire les tâches informatiques répétitives
  • Combine la surveillance, les correctifs, la sauvegarde et l'accès à distance en une seule plateforme.
  • Convient parfaitement aux environnements distants, hybrides ou multi-sites.
  • Conçu pour simplifier les opérations informatiques courantes

Services :

  • Surveillance des points finaux et des appareils
  • Gestion et automatisation des correctifs
  • Accès à distance et dépannage
  • Outils de sauvegarde et de récupération
  • Documentation et support de billetterie
  • Aide à l'intégration et assistance à la clientèle

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.ninjaone.com
  • Courriel : sales@ninjaone.com
  • Téléphone : +1 888 542-8339
  • Adresse : 301 Congress Ave, 4th Floor Austin, TX 78701 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/ninjaone
  • Twitter : x.com/ninjaone
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/ninjaone
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/NinjaOne

12. Atatus

Atatus emprunte une voie plus moderne que celle à laquelle les gens sont habitués avec Nagios. Au lieu de s'appuyer sur de nombreuses configurations manuelles ou des plugins supplémentaires, ils essaient de donner aux équipes un endroit unique pour surveiller tout ce qui se passe dans leurs applications, leur infrastructure et leurs utilisateurs. Leur plateforme est construite autour de la visibilité en temps réel, de sorte que les développeurs et les équipes d'exploitation peuvent repérer les ralentissements ou les erreurs sans avoir à fouiller dans de multiples outils. Elle est conçue pour les environnements où les choses changent rapidement et où les équipes veulent une expérience plus fluide et plus propre que l'ancienne pile de surveillance.

Ils ont également déployé beaucoup d'efforts pour que l'interface soit suffisamment simple pour que n'importe quel membre de l'équipe puisse s'y retrouver. Les tableaux de bord sont prêts à l'emploi et le gros du travail se fait en coulisses. Parce qu'Atatus couvre les mesures, les journaux, les traces et l'expérience utilisateur en un seul endroit, les équipes n'ont pas besoin de passer d'un système à l'autre juste pour comprendre ce qui s'est cassé. Il s'agit d'une approche plus unifiée qui convient bien aux entreprises qui veulent quelque chose de moderne sans avoir à gérer les frais généraux habituels.

Faits marquants :

  • Surveillance unifiée des applications, de l'infrastructure, des journaux et de l'expérience utilisateur
  • Installation minimale par rapport aux outils traditionnels
  • Visibilité en temps réel grâce à des tableaux de bord clairs
  • L'accent est mis sur la facilité d'utilisation et la fluidité des flux de travail.
  • Conçu pour les équipes modernes de DevOps et d'ingénierie

Services :

  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure pour les serveurs, les conteneurs et les ressources cloud.
  • Contrôle de la performance des applications
  • Surveillance de l'utilisateur réel pour la performance de l'interface utilisateur
  • Outils de gestion des journaux et de corrélation
  • Suivi des erreurs et alertes
  • Aide à l'installation et soutien à la plateforme

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.atatus.com
  • Courriel : success@atatus.com
  • Téléphone : +1-760-465-2330
  • Adresse : No.51, 2nd Floor, IndiQube Alpine, Labour Colony, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ekkatuthangal, Guindy, Chennai, India - 600032
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/atatus
  • Twitter : x.com/atatusapp
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/atatusapp
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Atatus

13. Sumo Logic

Sumo Logic s'appuie fortement sur les logs et l'analyse de la sécurité, ce qui lui confère une personnalité très différente de celle de Nagios. Au lieu de se concentrer sur les contrôles et les alertes simples, Sumo Logic s'efforce de transformer d'énormes quantités de données de journalisation en quelque chose que les équipes peuvent réellement utiliser. Leur plateforme est conçue pour les environnements en nuage où tout évolue rapidement et où il y a beaucoup trop de données pour qu'une personne puisse les trier manuellement. Ils essaient donc d'aider les équipes à donner un sens à tout ce bruit, que ce soit pour le dépannage, la surveillance ou le suivi des problèmes de sécurité.

Ils mettent également l'accent sur l'automatisation, en particulier en ce qui concerne les incidents. L'idée est que les équipes ne devraient pas avoir à suivre chaque alerte à la main si le système peut regrouper les problèmes liés ou filtrer ceux qui n'ont pas d'importance. Sumo Logic convient parfaitement aux entreprises qui s'appuient déjà sur des services en nuage et qui souhaitent disposer d'un outil capable de s'adapter à cette échelle. Au lieu d'assembler de nombreux plugins, ils rassemblent tout dans une seule plateforme et vous permettent d'explorer les journaux, les métriques et les données de sécurité sans avoir à faire des pieds et des mains.

Faits marquants :

  • Forte concentration sur l'analyse des logs et la surveillance de l'ère du cloud
  • Automatismes intégrés pour l'investigation des alertes
  • Plate-forme unifiée couvrant la fiabilité, la sécurité et le dépannage
  • Fonctionne bien dans les environnements cloud et hybrides
  • Prise en charge de nombreuses intégrations dès le départ

Services :

  • Collecte et analyse des logs
  • SIEM en nuage et analyse de la sécurité
  • Surveillance de l'infrastructure et des applications
  • Enquête sur les incidents et corrélation des alertes
  • Outils d'interrogation, tableaux de bord et rapports
  • Ressources d'assistance et d'intégration

Contact Info :

  • Site web : www.sumologic.com
  • Courriel : sales@sumologic.com
  • Téléphone : +1 650-810-8700
  • Adresse : 3600 Glenwood Ave : 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 320 Raleigh, NC 27612
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/sumo-logic
  • Twitter : x.com/SumoLogic
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Sumo.Logic

14. Sensu

Sensu prend un chemin très différent de l'ancien style de surveillance Nagios. Au lieu de s'appuyer sur des contrôles statiques et de nombreuses configurations manuelles, Sensu traite la surveillance comme une extension du code de votre infrastructure. Leur plateforme est construite autour de l'idée que tout ce qui se trouve dans les environnements modernes est constamment en mouvement, en augmentation ou en diminution d'échelle, ou change complètement de forme. Pour cette raison, elle se concentre sur la création d'un pipeline dans lequel les équipes peuvent définir des contrôles, des filtres et des flux de travail dans le code et laisser le système s'occuper du reste. C'est une configuration qui a tendance à s'adapter aux équipes qui travaillent déjà dans des configurations conteneurisées ou multi-nuages.

Ils facilitent également le regroupement des différents outils de surveillance que vous possédez déjà. Sensu se situe au milieu et aide à unifier les données provenant des métriques, des logs, des traces et même d'outils plus anciens comme les plugins Nagios. L'objectif n'est pas de tout jeter et de repartir à zéro, mais de donner aux équipes un moyen plus souple d'automatiser les alertes, d'enregistrer automatiquement les nouveaux services et de suivre les environnements qui changent un peu trop rapidement pour les tableaux de bord manuels.

Faits marquants :

  • Construit autour de la surveillance en tant que code
  • Fonctionne bien dans les environnements dynamiques et multi-nuages
  • Supporte les plugins Nagios existants et d'autres outils de surveillance
  • Automatise l'enregistrement et le désenregistrement des services
  • Agit comme un pipeline d'observabilité qui relie les métriques, les journaux et les traces entre eux.

Services :

  • Mise en place et gestion du pipeline d'observabilité
  • Surveillance en tant que configuration de code
  • Intégration avec Nagios, Prometheus, StatsD, Telegraf, etc.
  • Découverte automatique de l'infrastructure et des services
  • Alertes, filtrage et automatisation des flux de travail
  • Documentation, soutien à la communauté et ressources d'intégration

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : sensu.io
  • Adresse : 305 Main Street Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
  • Twitter : x.com/sensu

15. Moniteur Dotcom

Dotcom-Monitor adopte une approche très différente des outils traditionnels tels que Nagios. Au lieu de vérifier uniquement si un serveur répond, ils se concentrent sur la façon dont les utilisateurs réels expérimentent un site ou une application. Leur plateforme s'appuie fortement sur des tests de navigateurs réels, en passant par des éléments tels que les connexions, les paniers et les flux de paiement, ce qui permet de détecter plus facilement des problèmes que des pings de temps de fonctionnement de base ne révéleraient jamais. Les équipes qui s'appuient sur des parcours utilisateurs ou des comportements frontaux complexes ont tendance à utiliser Dotcom-Monitor lorsqu'elles veulent quelque chose de plus pratique et de moins manuel que des configurations lourdes en plugins.

Ils couvrent également les parties les plus discrètes de la surveillance qui sont souvent ignorées, comme SSL, DNS et les vérifications approfondies de l'API. Tout est regroupé au même endroit, et le flux de travail ressemble plus à un dépannage avec des visuels clairs qu'à une recherche dans les logs pour essayer de reconstituer les choses. Pour les équipes à la recherche d'une alternative à Nagios qui gère les défis modernes de performance et de fiabilité du web, Dotcom-Monitor comble ces lacunes sans demander aux utilisateurs de reconstruire leur surveillance à partir de zéro.

Faits marquants :

  • Suivi en temps réel du navigateur pour un parcours complet de l'utilisateur
  • Couvre les applications web, le temps de fonctionnement, les API, le SSL et le DNS en une seule plateforme.
  • Des diagnostics visuels tels que des cascades et des captures d'écran pour un dépannage plus rapide
  • Surveillance à partir de nombreux sites dans le monde pour une meilleure compréhension régionale
  • Utile pour les équipes ayant des applications complexes et lourdes.

Services :

  • Surveillance des sites web et des applications web
  • Suivi des transactions et du parcours de l'utilisateur
  • Surveillance et validation de l'API
  • Vérification des certificats SSL
  • Surveillance du DNS et contrôles de disponibilité
  • Alertes et diagnostics avec intégration des outils courants de gestion des incidents

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.dotcom-monitor.com
  • Courriel : sales@dotcom-monitor.com
  • Téléphone : 1-888-479-0741
  • Adresse : 2500 Shadywood Rd, Excelsior, MN 55331 USA 2500 Shadywood Rd, Excelsior, MN 55331 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/dotcom-monitor
  • Twitter : x.com/dotcom_monitor
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/dotcommonitor

Conclusion

En regardant les outils qui se sont développés autour de l'espace de surveillance, il est assez clair que les équipes ne travaillent plus de la même manière qu'à l'époque où Nagios était le choix par défaut. Certaines entreprises s'appuient sur des plateformes d'observabilité complète, d'autres se concentrent sur l'automatisation, et quelques-unes essaient de faire en sorte que la surveillance ne soit plus une corvée, mais plutôt un outil qui soutient tranquillement le travail en arrière-plan. Il n'y a pas de voie unique qui convienne à tout le monde, et c'est en fait l'avantage.

Que vous recherchiez une meilleure visibilité, une configuration plus facile ou quelque chose qui ne nécessite pas la maintenance d'une pile de scripts personnalisés, il existe des options solides à tous les niveaux. Le moyen le plus simple de savoir ce qui fonctionne est de tester un ou deux outils avec une petite partie de votre environnement. Vous saurez rapidement lesquels réduisent le bruit et lesquels ne font qu'ajouter des pièces mobiles. Une fois que vous avez trouvé une configuration qui permet à votre équipe de se concentrer sur le travail réel au lieu de s'occuper des configurations d'alerte, elle tend à devenir la nouvelle norme sans trop de débats.

 

Top AWS CloudFormation Alternatives for Scalable Infrastructure

CloudFormation is fine until it isn’t. Once teams start juggling multi-cloud setups, heavier automation needs, or faster deployment cycles, the tool can feel a bit limiting. That’s usually when the search for something more flexible or developer-friendly begins.

In this guide, we’ll take a closer look at the alternatives that have stepped up in this space. Some lean into easier templating, others focus on deeper automation, and a few simply remove the friction CloudFormation tends to introduce. More importantly, we’ll highlight the companies behind these tools, the ones helping teams build cleaner infrastructure without the extra noise. This isn’t about finding a magic replacement, but about understanding which direction fits the way your team actually works. Let’s break it down.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst takes a pretty different approach compared to CloudFormation and most traditional IaC tools. Instead of asking teams to define every piece of infrastructure line by line, they flip it around and let developers describe what the app actually needs. From there, the platform assembles the whole setup automatically. It appeals to teams that want the benefits of IaC without the long trail of Terraform files, YAML, reviews, refactors, and everything else that usually piles up when apps scale.

They also lean into the idea of staying cloud-agnostic, which is handy when people don’t want their infrastructure templates tied too tightly to one provider. AppFirst handles the security defaults, the networking bits, the logs, the monitoring, and all the internal wiring that normally eats up half a sprint. It’s a different kind of alternative to CloudFormation, but for teams that want to reduce IaC overhead instead of expanding it, it ends up filling a gap nicely.

Faits marquants :

  • Application-first approach instead of writing infrastructure code
  • Fonctionne sur AWS, Azure et GCP
  • Provides built-in logging, monitoring, and auditing
  • Standardizes security and cloud best practices automatically
  • Offers SaaS and self-hosted deployment options

Services :

  • Mise à disposition automatisée de l'infrastructure
  • Cross-cloud deployment support
  • Security and compliance enforcement
  • Cost visibility and audit logs
  • Outils d'observabilité intégrés
  • App-focused configuration workflows

Contact Info :

2. Pulumi

Pulumi comes up a lot whenever people start looking for something more flexible than CloudFormation. They take a pretty straightforward approach to infrastructure as code by letting teams work in normal programming languages instead of dealing with long YAML files. Most folks use it when they want their infrastructure to feel like part of their actual software workflow instead of a separate world they only touch when something breaks. Pulumi also brings everything into one place, so teams can manage code, secrets, policies, and automation without juggling a bunch of disconnected tools.

They also lean heavily into making day-to-day tasks less painful. Engineers can test code, reuse components, and work in the same languages they already use for their apps. On top of that, they’ve built extra tools for things like centralizing secrets, keeping an eye on multi-cloud setups, and giving teams a clearer path to build internal platforms. Their newer AI features add another layer, helping automate some of the routine work without getting in the way.

Faits marquants :

  • Uses real programming languages for infrastructure
  • Works across multiple cloud providers
  • Includes built-in tools for secrets, config, and policy control
  • Offers AI features to automate common tasks
  • Supports internal platform building and reusable components

Services :

  • Infrastructure as code tooling
  • Multi-cloud resource management
  • Secrets and configuration management
  • Policy and governance features
  • AI-driven infrastructure automation
  • Internal developer platform support

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.pulumi.com
  • Address: 601 Union St., Suite 1415 Seattle, WA 98101 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/pulumi
  • Twitter : x.com/pulumicorp

3. Terraform

Terraform is usually one of the first names people bring up when they want something more flexible than CloudFormation. They focus on describing infrastructure in a simple config language so teams can manage resources across different clouds the same way. Most folks use it when they want a single workflow instead of juggling AWS-specific templates and separate tools for everything else. Terraform also fits well into larger engineering setups because it works with a wide range of providers, not just the major clouds.

They put a lot of effort into helping teams handle more than just basic provisioning. Their ecosystem includes tools for building consistent images, managing policies, and coordinating multi-cloud setups. The whole idea is to treat infrastructure as something that can be planned, tracked, and changed with fewer surprises. It’s not meant to replace engineering effort, just make the work less scattered.

Faits marquants :

  • Lets teams manage infrastructure using a single config language
  • Works across cloud providers and many external services
  • Supports team workflows through versioning and planning
  • Large ecosystem of integrations and reusable configurations
  • Can be paired with other HashiCorp tools for broader workflows

Services :

  • Infrastructure as code tooling
  • Multi-cloud provisioning
  • Team collaboration features
  • Gestion des politiques et des configurations
  • Image and environment provisioning via related tools
  • Support for automation and CI workflows

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.hashicorp.com
  • Address: 101 2nd Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, California, 94105 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/hashicorp
  • Twitter : x.com/hashicorp
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/HashiCorp

4. env0

env0 often comes up when teams hit the limits of CloudFormation and need something that can manage Terraform or other IaC tools in a cleaner, more predictable way. Instead of relying on CloudFormation’s AWS-only workflow, env0 gives teams a central place to run their infrastructure pipelines across different clouds and environments. It helps keep everything consistent, so deployments don’t depend on whatever script or shortcut someone used last month. For teams juggling Terraform stacks or shifting away from CloudFormation templates, this kind of structure makes day-to-day work less chaotic.

They also deal with a lot of the rough edges that show up once IaC gets bigger. env0 adds guardrails, review steps, and visibility that CloudFormation alone doesn’t really cover. Teams can see what’s being deployed, catch issues earlier, and rely on one shared workflow instead of dozens of separate processes. The idea isn’t to replace Terraform or OpenTofu, but to sit on top of them and keep the whole operation organized while still letting engineers work the way they prefer.

Faits marquants :

  • Helps teams move beyond AWS-only CloudFormation workflows
  • Standardizes IaC processes for Terraform and other tools
  • Supports Git-based reviews and predictable pipelines
  • Adds guardrails like RBAC and policy checks
  • Improves visibility into deployments and environment changes

Services :

  • IaC workflow automation
  • Multi-environment and multi-account coordination
  • Governance and policy management
  • Cost oversight and usage controls
  • Self-service deployment features
  • Integrations for Terraform and related IaC tools

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.env0.com
  • Address: 100 Causeway Street, Suite 900, Boston, MA 02114 United States 
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/env0
  • Twitter : x.com/envzero

5. Spacelift

Spacelift shows up on the radar for teams that have outgrown CloudFormation’s way of doing things and want something that handles modern IaC workflows without locking them into one cloud. Instead of writing long CloudFormation templates and manually wiring everything into a pipeline, Spacelift gives teams a central place to run Terraform, OpenTofu, Ansible, and other tools they already rely on. It’s the kind of setup people look for when they want more flexibility and a cleaner path to manage multi-cloud or mixed-infrastructure environments.

They also tackle a few of the problems that come up when CloudFormation becomes a bottleneck. With Spacelift, deployments follow the same workflow every time, reviews are easier to manage, and changes are more visible across teams. Developers can spin up things through a controlled process, while platform teams still keep the guardrails in place. It’s not trying to replace IaC tools themselves, but it sits on top and helps organize everything they’re doing.

Faits marquants :

  • Built to support Terraform, OpenTofu, Ansible, and other CloudFormation alternatives
  • Helps teams move away from AWS-only pipelines
  • Standardizes IaC workflows across clouds and environments
  • Adds policies, drift checks, and visibility CloudFormation doesn’t cover well
  • Makes self-service possible while keeping platform teams in control

Services :

  • IaC orchestration for Terraform, OpenTofu, CloudFormation, and more
  • Automated workflows for provisioning and configuration
  • Policy and access controls for safer deployments
  • Drift detection and environment tracking
  • Multi-cloud and multi-environment management
  • Self-hosted and SaaS deployment options

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : spacelift.io
  • Email: info@spacelift.io
  • Address: 541 Jefferson Ave. Suite 100 Redwood City CA 94063 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/spacelift-io
  • Twitter : x.com/spaceliftio
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/spaceliftio

6. Chef

Chef is often considered when teams want an alternative to CloudFormation that goes beyond template-driven provisioning and gives them more control over how servers and configurations are managed over time. Instead of defining everything in long JSON or YAML documents, Chef uses policy-as-code to keep infrastructure consistent across cloud and on-prem environments. Teams look at it when they need something flexible enough to manage configuration, compliance, and workflows in one place, especially if they’re mixing AWS with other platforms.

They also focus on the ongoing lifecycle of infrastructure, which is something CloudFormation doesn’t really cover well. Chef lets teams automate configuration, enforce standards, and run audits through repeatable policies rather than relying on manual fixes or ad hoc scripts. It fits into setups where people want more day-to-day control and want to avoid drift, while still keeping their systems aligned with the rules and processes their organization depends on.

Faits marquants :

  • Supports policy-as-code as an alternative to CloudFormation templates
  • Helps manage configuration, compliance, and workflows across environments
  • Works across AWS, cloud, hybrid, and on-prem setups
  • Provides guardrails through repeatable policies and audits
  • Designed for long-term infrastructure consistency, not just provisioning

Services :

  • Infrastructure configuration management
  • Compliance and security policy enforcement
  • Workflow and job orchestration
  • Application and node management
  • Support for cloud, hybrid, and on-prem environments

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.chef.io
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/chef-software
  • Twitter : x.com/chef
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/chef_software
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/getchefdotcom

ansible

7. Ansible

Ansible is one of the tools teams look at when CloudFormation starts feeling too tied to AWS and not flexible enough for everything else they need to manage. Instead of writing long CloudFormation templates, Ansible uses simple YAML playbooks that describe the state you want your systems to be in. They lean into automation and configuration management rather than just provisioning, which makes Ansible useful when teams need something that works across clouds, on-prem machines, network devices, or whatever else is in the mix.

They also keep things pretty straightforward by running without agents and relying on standard connections like SSH. This helps teams manage a lot of day-to-day tasks that CloudFormation doesn’t cover, like patching, updating configs, and keeping servers consistent over time. It fits well in setups where infrastructure needs regular adjustments and automation, and where people want a tool that can handle changes across different environments without locking them into AWS’s way of doing things.

Faits marquants :

  • Uses simple YAML playbooks instead of CloudFormation templates
  • Fonctionne dans les environnements cloud, sur site et hybrides
  • Agent-less design that reduces setup and maintenance
  • Helps automate ongoing configuration and system changes
  • Supports a wide range of operating systems and platforms

Services :

  • Configuration management and automation
  • Playbook-driven provisioning
  • Software deployment and updates
  • Zero-downtime rolling updates
  • Multi-environment and multi-platform support

Informations de contact :

  • Website: docs.ansible.com 

8. Salt Project

Salt is one of the tools people look at when CloudFormation feels too tied to AWS and not flexible enough for everything happening across their infrastructure. Instead of relying on templates, Salt leans on automation, remote execution, and configuration management to handle systems at scale. They use a data-driven approach that lets teams push changes out quickly and keep machines aligned with whatever state they’re supposed to be in, whether that’s on AWS, on-prem, or somewhere in between. It’s the kind of tool teams consider when they need something that can react fast and manage a lot of moving pieces at once.

They also focus heavily on ongoing operations, not just provisioning. Salt gives teams a way to run commands across large fleets, automate routine fixes, and enforce configuration standards without jumping between different tools. For people moving away from CloudFormation, Salt often ends up being the part that handles the day-to-day management work that a template-based system doesn’t cover. It’s useful when infrastructure needs constant updates and you want a system that can automate those tasks without turning everything into a manual effort.

Faits marquants :

  • Fonctionne dans les environnements cloud, sur site et hybrides
  • Uses automation and remote execution instead of static templates
  • Helps keep systems aligned with defined states
  • Supports fast, large-scale configuration changes
  • Useful for teams needing more operational control than CloudFormation provides

Services :

  • Gestion de la configuration
  • Remote execution and orchestration
  • System state enforcement
  • Multi-environment automation
  • Support for cloud, hybrid, and on-prem setups

Informations de contact :

  • Website: saltproject.io
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/saltproject
  • Twitter: x.com/Salt_Project_OS
  • Instagram: www.instagram.com/saltproject_oss
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/SaltProjectOSS

9. OpenTofu

OpenTofu is usually mentioned when teams want to step away from CloudFormation and move toward something more flexible without losing the familiar Terraform workflow. Since it’s a community-driven fork of Terraform, it works as a drop-in replacement, which makes it easier for teams to switch without rewriting everything. They focus on keeping IaC open-source and giving engineers the same style of configuration they’re used to, just without the licensing concerns that pushed many people to look for alternatives in the first place.

They also add a few extra features that help with the things CloudFormation doesn’t cover well, like managing multi-cloud setups, organizing modules, and giving teams more control over how resources get deployed. OpenTofu keeps the same provider ecosystem as Terraform, so teams can use it to build and manage infrastructure across different clouds while moving away from AWS-only templates. It fits into workflows where people want IaC that feels familiar but gives them more long-term stability and freedom.

Faits marquants :

  • Works as a Terraform-compatible alternative to CloudFormation
  • Fully open-source and community-driven
  • Supports multi-cloud and multi-environment configurations
  • Compatible with a large provider and module ecosystem
  • Adds features like resource exclusion, state encryption, and advanced provider patterns

Services :

  • Infrastructure as code configuration
  • Multi-cloud resource deployment
  • State management and encryption
  • Module and provider support
  • Git-based workflows and version control integration

Informations de contact :

  • Website: opentofu.org
  • Twitter: x.com/opentofuorg

10. Crossplane

Crossplane is something teams pick up when CloudFormation starts feeling too limited or too AWS-shaped for the kind of platforms they want to build. Instead of relying on templates that only describe resources, Crossplane lets them create their own APIs on top of Kubernetes. That means they can define infrastructure in a more modular way and expose it to developers without making everyone learn the low-level details of each cloud provider. For teams that want to build a consistent experience across clouds, or even just keep AWS a bit more organized, this approach gives them more room to design things the way they want.

They also focus heavily on the idea of running infrastructure through a control plane rather than a one-off provisioning tool. Crossplane plugs into Kubernetes, so everything becomes declarative, version controlled, and easy to extend. Instead of treating infrastructure as a set of isolated pieces, teams can stitch together policies, permissions, and resource definitions into one cohesive workflow. For anyone moving away from CloudFormation, it’s appealing because it offers a lot of flexibility while still keeping the overall process predictable.

Faits marquants :

  • Lets teams build custom APIs as an alternative to CloudFormation templates
  • Works across multiple cloud providers through a Kubernetes control plane
  • Supports declarative workflows for consistent infrastructure management
  • Integrates naturally with cloud native tools and Kubernetes features
  • Helps platform teams design their own opinionated infrastructure layers

Services :

  • Custom control plane creation
  • Multi-cloud resource orchestration
  • Policy and permission management
  • Declarative configuration workflows
  • Kubernetes-based extension and integration

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.crossplane.io
  • Email: info@crossplane.io
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/crossplane
  • Twitter : x.com/crossplane_io

11. Northflank

Northflank is one of those platforms teams look at when CloudFormation starts feeling a bit too tied to AWS and not great for running workloads across different clouds. Instead of asking engineers to deal with the usual maze of YAML, cloud consoles, and pipeline stitching, Northflank gives them a single place to deploy and manage apps, databases, and jobs across whatever cloud they already use. They lean into this idea of bringing your own cloud, so teams can stay on AWS if they want, or mix in GCP, Azure, or on-prem without rebuilding their setup from scratch.

They also handle a lot of the operational work people usually end up scripting around when moving away from CloudFormation. Things like workload automation, preview environments, pipelines, failover, and cluster lifecycle management all get baked into one platform. Teams use it when they want the freedom to run things wherever it makes sense but still keep a consistent developer experience. It ends up acting like the missing layer between cloud resources and day-to-day engineering workflows, especially for groups that want less infrastructure busywork and more focus on shipping code.

Faits marquants :

  • Works across AWS, GCP, Azure, on-prem, and hybrid setups
  • Offers a unified workflow instead of relying on CloudFormation templates
  • Provides consistent deployment and management across clouds
  • Supports GitOps, pipelines, preview environments, and autoscaling
  • Simplifies Kubernetes operations through BYOC and BYOK

Services :

  • Multi-cloud workload deployment
  • Kubernetes cluster lifecycle management
  • Application, database, and job hosting
  • Automated pipelines and GitOps workflows
  • Failover and disaster recovery tools
  • Internal developer platform capabilities

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : northflank.com
  • Email: contact@northflank.com
  • Address: 20-22 Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GU
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/northflank
  • Twitter : x.com/northflank

12. Puppet

Puppet shows up in conversations about CloudFormation alternatives mainly because they take a different angle on the whole infrastructure problem. Instead of focusing on how to create resources, they lean into keeping everything in the state it should be. Their approach tends to make more sense for teams that care about long-term consistency across fleets of servers or hybrid setups, rather than just spinning up cloud resources and walking away. A lot of what they do is about turning configuration work into code and letting the system enforce those rules automatically, which can feel like a big relief compared to chasing drift by hand.

They also fit into workflows where CloudFormation starts to feel a bit narrow. Puppet plays well across different environments, not just AWS, and their model suits teams that want a central source of truth for how systems should behave. Whether it is operating systems, app configs, or a mix of on-prem and cloud machines, Puppet gives teams a way to define everything once and let automation do the repetitive work. It is a different style of IaC, but in many organizations it ends up filling in gaps CloudFormation doesn’t try to solve.

Faits marquants :

  • Focuses on configuration management rather than cloud-specific provisioning
  • Helps maintain consistent state across servers and environments
  • Useful in hybrid and multi-cloud setups
  • Emphasizes version-controlled, repeatable infrastructure practices
  • Supports modeling infrastructure as code with a declarative language

Services :

  • Configuration management and enforcement
  • Infrastructure as code workflows
  • Policy and compliance automation
  • Orchestration for tasks and deployments
  • Integration with CI/CD and monitoring tools

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.puppet.com
  • Email: sales-request@perforce.com
  • Téléphone : +1 612.517.2100
  • Address: 400 First Avenue North #400 Minneapolis, MN 55401 USA

13. Google Cloud Deployment Manager

Google Cloud’s Deployment Manager comes up pretty often when teams are looking for alternatives to CloudFormation, mostly because it gives them a similar declarative way to define infrastructure but without locking everything into AWS. Instead of writing long lists of steps, they describe what the final setup should look like, and Deployment Manager figures out how to make it happen across Google Cloud services. It tends to appeal to teams that want structure but also like being able to break things into reusable templates instead of rewriting the same config for every project.

They also lean heavily into templating, which lets teams build out complex setups without drowning in YAML. People can mix Python or Jinja with their configuration files, which makes tweaking things for different environments a bit easier. It slots comfortably into the usual IaC routine version control, code reviews, repeatable deployments and gives teams a predictable way to manage GCP resources when CloudFormation isn’t an option or when they’re running multi-cloud setups.

Faits marquants :

  • Declarative IaC approach focused on Google Cloud resources
  • Uses templates to structure and reuse configurations
  • Supports YAML with Jinja or Python templates for flexibility
  • Works well with Git-based workflows
  • Lets teams manage deployments consistently across environments

Services :

  • Infrastructure provisioning and updates
  • Template-based resource definitions
  • Multi-environment configuration management
  • Integration with gcloud CLI and API
  • Version-controlled IaC workflows

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : cloud.google.com
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/showcase/google-cloud
  • Twitter : x.com/googlecloud
  • Instagram: www.instagram.com/googlecloud
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/googlecloud

Conclusion

Looking at CloudFormation alternatives makes one thing pretty clear: teams have a lot more freedom now than they did a few years ago. Some tools stick close to the traditional IaC model, others build whole platforms on top of it, and a few try to remove infrastructure work from developers almost entirely. There isn’t one perfect path here, just different ways to lighten the load depending on how your team likes to work.

If you’re trying to figure out what fits, the easiest move is to test a couple of options on a small, low-risk project. You’ll quickly feel which approach matches your workflow and which one adds friction. And once you find a tool that actually makes deployments less of a headache, it tends to become part of the routine without much debate.

 

Top Docker Swarm Alternatives: Elevate Your Cloud Infrastructure

Docker Swarm was a go-to option for container orchestration when it first came on the scene, but let’s be honest as your business scales, so do your needs. While it still does the job, there are newer, more flexible solutions out there that might be a better fit for your growing operations. In this article, we’ll explore some of the top Docker Swarm alternatives that offer more power, flexibility, and scalability. Whether you’re a startup or a large enterprise, there’s a solution here that can help keep your deployment on track and moving forward. Let’s dive in.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst takes a pretty different angle compared to most platforms in the infrastructure space. Instead of asking teams to learn Terraform, compare cloud services, or untangle long YAML files, they flip the whole thing around. Their idea is that developers should only have to describe what an app needs, and the platform will figure out the infrastructure behind the scenes. It’s a simple pitch, but you can see why a lot of teams gravitate toward it when they’re tired of maintaining homegrown tooling or answering the same infra questions over and over.

They also focus a lot on helping companies keep things consistent without slowing anyone down. Since they handle the provisioning layer, every app gets the same baseline for security, logging, monitoring, networking, and all the other things that normally vary from team to team. The appeal is basically this: teams ship faster, and nobody has to rebuild a platform from scratch. Whether a company works in AWS, Azure, or GCP, the workflow stays the same, which saves people from relearning everything when environments change.

Faits marquants :

  • Lets teams define app requirements without writing infrastructure code
  • Handles security, networking, and cloud best practices automatically
  • Works across AWS, Azure, and GCP with the same workflow
  • Offers visibility into costs and infrastructure changes
  • Can run as SaaS or as a self-hosted setup

Services :

  • Automatic infrastructure provisioning for cloud workloads
  • Journalisation, surveillance et alerte intégrées
  • Managed security configuration and compliance controls
  • Cross-cloud application deployment and abstraction
  • Centralized auditing and cost tracking
  • Self-hosted deployment option for teams with tighter requirements

Contact Info :

2. Nomad by HashiCorp

Nomad is a flexible and simple tool designed for orchestrating containers, binaries, and batch jobs. Whether it’s for applications running in the cloud or on-prem, it makes managing large-scale deployments less of a headache. Unlike some other orchestrators that can be a bit too heavy for smaller setups, Nomad is built to scale, from small environments to enterprise-grade infrastructures, without overwhelming users with unnecessary complexity. It’s a great fit for teams looking for something that’s straightforward but still offers the power needed for growing operations.

What sets Nomad apart is its ability to handle both containerized and non-containerized workloads, giving teams the flexibility to mix and match based on their needs. It integrates seamlessly with other HashiCorp tools, like Terraform and Vault, making it a solid choice for businesses already working with those solutions. It also offers features like traffic encryption, access control, and job resiliency to ensure everything runs smoothly, even during unexpected disruptions.

Faits marquants :

  • Flexible for both containerized and non-containerized applications
  • Integrates with HashiCorp tools (Terraform, Vault, Consul)
  • Scales easily from small to large environments
  • Offers features like job resiliency and traffic encryption
  • Simple to use with a focus on reducing complexity

Services :

  • Container orchestration
  • Planification des tâches
  • Cluster management
  • Integration with Terraform, Vault, and Consul
  • Resilient job management and recovery
  • Security features like traffic encryption and access control

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.hashicorp.com
  • Address: 101 2nd Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, California, 94105 USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/hashicorp
  • Twitter : x.com/hashicorp
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/HashiCorp

3. Red Hat

Red Hat is well known for offering a flexible, enterprise-ready hybrid cloud platform that makes managing complex systems much more streamlined. Their focus is on creating a consistent and scalable environment for containerized applications. With Red Hat OpenShift, businesses can manage their containers, applications, and services across on-premise and cloud-based infrastructure, all while ensuring security and reliability. The platform works seamlessly with Kubernetes and is built with a developer-first mindset, enabling easy integration with existing workflows, and providing a foundation for developers to quickly build and scale their applications.

Red Hat’s approach is all about flexibility and collaboration. It gives organizations the tools to automate their workflows, maintain control over the entire lifecycle of their applications, and ensure seamless integration across different environments. With their extensive open-source contributions and a large community of developers, Red Hat’s solutions are trusted by many large-scale enterprises to keep their systems secure, efficient, and adaptable to growing business needs.

Faits marquants :

  • Hybrid cloud solutions for both containerized and virtualized applications
  • Seamless integration with Kubernetes and other HashiCorp tools
  • Developer-friendly workflows and built-in CI/CD pipelines
  • Offers automatic platform updates and upgrades
  • Provides centralized policy management across multiple teams

Services :

  • Container orchestration with Red Hat OpenShift
  • Automated platform updates and cloud management
  • Kubernetes integration and management
  • Cloud-native application deployment and scaling
  • Security management and policy enforcement
  • Hybrid cloud consulting and support services

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.redhat.com
  • Courriel : apac@redhat.com
  • Téléphone : 8887334281
  • Adresse : 100 E. Davie Street Raleigh, NC 27601, USA
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/red-hat
  • Twitter : x.com/RedHat
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/RedHat

4. Rancher

Rancher is a tool designed to make Kubernetes management a bit easier. It’s a platform that lets you deploy and manage Kubernetes clusters anywhere whether that’s in the cloud or on-premises without needing to dive into the weeds. One of the key things Rancher does is centralize the management of multiple Kubernetes clusters, which can be a huge time-saver. It simplifies things like authentication, access control, and monitoring, making it a solid choice for teams working with Kubernetes at scale. Plus, Rancher gives you the flexibility to integrate with other systems, so you can make it fit into your existing setup without much hassle.

What’s nice about Rancher is that it’s not just about deployment. It’s about keeping everything running smoothly once it’s up and running. The platform offers built-in monitoring and alerting for clusters, integrates with CI/CD systems (or has its own tools), and helps you manage your workloads automatically. If you’re looking for something that can keep everything in check across multiple Kubernetes environments, Rancher can take the load off your shoulders without adding too much complexity.

Faits marquants :

  • Centralized management for multiple Kubernetes clusters
  • Simplifies authentication and role-based access control (RBAC)
  • Built-in monitoring, alerting, and log management
  • Easy integration with external CI/CD systems or Rancher’s Fleet
  • Supports both cloud and on-premises environments

Services :

  • Kubernetes cluster management
  • Monitoring and alerting for clusters and resources
  • Access control and authentication management
  • CI/CD integration
  • Automatic workload deployment and upgrades via Fleet

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.rancher.com
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/rancher
  • Twitter: x.com/Rancher_Labs
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/rancherlabs

5. Mirantis

Mirantis is a company that makes it easier to manage complex cloud and AI infrastructures. Their main focus is on providing a smooth way to run Kubernetes clusters across various environments, including on-prem, hybrid, and cloud setups. What’s great about Mirantis is that they’ve really honed in on simplifying the process of managing AI workloads, which can often be a headache. Whether it’s providing infrastructure as a service or automating the lifecycle of AI models, they’ve got tools like k0rdent to streamline the whole process from bare metal to running models in production. For organizations looking to build and manage AI platforms with minimal friction, Mirantis’ solutions are a solid option.

Mirantis is also big on helping companies modernize their applications. They offer a bunch of tools to automate infrastructure, reduce costs, and ensure that everything runs smoothly. From AI PaaS to GPU cloud solutions, their platform supports a variety of use cases, particularly around AI and machine learning. It’s not just about managing workloads; Mirantis wants to make the entire process from setup to scaling easy and efficient. Whether you’re migrating workloads or enhancing your cloud-native capabilities, Mirantis has a comprehensive toolkit for managing the tech that powers modern businesses.

Faits marquants :

  • Simplifies AI workload management across different environments
  • Offers infrastructure automation from bare metal to cloud
  • Focuses on streamlining the deployment and scaling of AI models
  • Integrates seamlessly with various cloud-native tools and ecosystems
  • Provides a variety of services for workload migration and application modernization

Services :

  • AI infrastructure and services automation
  • Kubernetes management and orchestration
  • Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) and GPU PaaS
  • Application modernization and cloud-native solutions
  • Enterprise-level support and consulting
  • Workload migration and management

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.mirantis.com
  • Phone: +1-650-963-9828
  • Address: 900 E Hamilton Avenue Suite 650Campbell, CA 95008 USA
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/mirantis
  • Twitter: x.com/MirantisIT
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/MirantisUS

6. Cloud Run by Google Cloud

Cloud Run is Google’s answer to simplifying app deployment and management. It allows developers to build and run applications in containers without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Whether it’s a web app, backend service, or an API, Cloud Run can take care of the deployment, scaling, and management, automatically handling scaling to zero when there’s no traffic. This means you don’t pay for idle time, which is a huge win if you’re running variable or event-driven workloads. It’s a serverless platform, so developers can just focus on the code and let Cloud Run handle the heavy lifting.

The platform also shines when it comes to flexibility. Developers can write code in pretty much any language or framework they prefer, package it into containers, and deploy it seamlessly. Cloud Run supports everything from simple microservices to complex AI inference workloads, with the added benefit of easy integration with other Google Cloud services. If you need more power, it even offers on-demand access to GPUs for handling AI tasks. It’s a practical solution for businesses wanting to deploy apps quickly and cost-effectively without worrying about managing servers or containers.

Faits marquants :

  • Serverless platform that scales containers automatically
  • Supports any language, framework, or library in containers
  • Only pay for running code, no costs when idle
  • Integrates easily with other Google Cloud services
  • On-demand GPU access for AI workloads

Services :

  • Deployment and management of containerized applications
  • Scalable hosting for web apps, microservices, and APIs
  • AI workload management with GPU support
  • Event-driven and batch data processing
  • Integration with Cloud Functions and other Google Cloud services

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : cloud.google.com
  • Twitter : x.com/googlecloud

7. Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo is a company that focuses on making cloud and virtualization technology more accessible, especially for service providers. Their platform is designed to help hosting companies, managed service providers, and cloud providers deliver a range of services from cloud infrastructure to software-defined storage. The real kicker with Virtuozzo is their flexibility. They’ve developed a hybrid solution that helps businesses manage and scale their cloud services, all while making it easier to automate a lot of the processes. It’s like a full stack solution that covers everything from virtual machines to containers, all in one package.

One of the coolest things about Virtuozzo is their focus on simplifying complex cloud management for service providers. With their solutions, businesses can offer a variety of services, from PaaS to cloud hosting, without the usual complexity. They recently acquired Jelastic to strengthen their cloud platform, allowing them to offer a more complete and integrated solution. The result is a platform that gives businesses the freedom to choose their solutions and workloads, plus an easy-to-use orchestration tool for managing it all. It’s all about helping companies offer a better range of cloud-based services while keeping things simple.

Faits marquants :

  • Offers a full stack cloud platform for service providers
  • Focuses on simplifying and automating cloud management
  • Hybrid virtualization solutions with self-service capabilities
  • Recently acquired Jelastic for more robust cloud services
  • Supports a wide range of workloads, from PaaS to cloud infrastructure

Services :

  • Hybrid cloud and virtualization solutions
  • Kubernetes orchestration and management
  • Software-defined storage
  • DevOps Platform as a Service (PaaS)
  • Multi-cloud and cloud-native application management
  • Professional services and support for service providers

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.virtuozzo.com
  • Courriel : info@virtuozzo.com
  • Address: Vordergasse 59, Schaffhausen 8200, Switzerland
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/virtuozzo
  • Twitter : x.com/virtuozzoinc
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/VirtuozzoInc

8. Portainer

Portainer is a platform designed to simplify the management of containerized applications, whether you’re working with Docker, Kubernetes, or Podman. What makes Portainer stand out is its ability to bring the power of containers to teams that might not have deep expertise in Kubernetes or Docker. It helps manage clusters at scale with an easy-to-use interface, so developers and IT teams can focus more on their applications and less on the complexities of container orchestration. Whether you’re running containers on the cloud, on-prem, or even at the edge, Portainer aims to make container management straightforward and accessible.

Portainer offers a range of features that cater to both enterprise IT teams and those working in industrial or IoT environments. It allows for fine-grained access control, supports automation, and integrates with popular container tools, making it ideal for organizations that want to manage their containers without reinventing the wheel. It’s also focused on scalability, enabling businesses to grow their container environments without the added complexity. With features like fleet management, centralized policy enforcement, and GitOps integration, Portainer simplifies the entire lifecycle of containerized apps, from deployment to monitoring.

Faits marquants :

  • Easy-to-use interface for managing containers at scale
  • Supports Docker, Kubernetes, and Podman environments
  • Provides access control and automation features
  • Can manage containers across cloud, on-prem, and edge environments
  • Integrates with existing container tools for centralized management

Services :

  • Orchestration et gestion des conteneurs
  • GitOps integration for automated deployments
  • Access control and role-based access management
  • Fleet management for managing large container environments
  • Industrial and IoT container management solutions
  • Managed platform services for enterprise teams

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.portainer.io
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/portainer

9. KubeSphere

KubeSphere is all about making Kubernetes more manageable, especially for teams that want to scale without all the complexity. It’s a container platform built on Kubernetes, designed to handle everything from multi-cloud to multi-cluster environments with ease. KubeSphere aims to simplify the operations of Kubernetes, offering out-of-the-box features like application lifecycle management, storage, networking solutions, and cloud-native observability. What’s neat about it is that it lets developers deploy apps quickly using a user-friendly interface, while operations teams can benefit from built-in tools for monitoring, alerting, and CI/CD workflows. The platform also emphasizes flexibility, so users can easily plug in other tools and expand capabilities as needed.

One of the main selling points of KubeSphere is its ability to support multi-tenancy, which is perfect for businesses that need to securely manage containerized applications across teams. It’s built to grow with your needs, providing automated scaling, upgrades, and easy Kubernetes clusters, whether you’re running on the cloud or on-prem. Plus, KubeSphere’s pluggable architecture means it can integrate with just about any open-source tool, letting users tailor their platform as they see fit. This makes it a solid choice for businesses looking for a versatile, enterprise-grade solution without being locked into one vendor.

Faits marquants :

  • Simplifies Kubernetes management with a user-friendly interface
  • Supports multi-cloud and multi-cluster environments
  • Offers built-in tools for CI/CD, observability, and monitoring
  • Pluggable architecture for easy integration with other tools
  • Focuses on multi-tenancy and secure app deployment across teams

Services :

  • Kubernetes management and orchestration
  • Application lifecycle management and monitoring
  • Cloud-native observability and alerting
  • DevOps and GitOps automation
  • Multi-cloud and multi-cluster management
  • Integration with open-source tools and extensions

Informations de contact :

  • Website: kubesphere.io
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/kubesphere
  • Twitter: x.com/KubeSphere
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/kubesphere

10. DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean is a cloud platform that makes it easier for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications. They focus on providing simple, affordable, and reliable infrastructure, especially for startups and small to medium-sized businesses. DigitalOcean’s offerings are designed to be user-friendly, even for teams that don’t have a lot of cloud experience. With tools like Droplets (virtual machines), Kubernetes, and managed databases, developers can quickly set up and manage their cloud environments without having to deal with the complexity of other larger providers. It’s all about keeping things simple and giving developers what they need to get their projects off the ground quickly.

What sets DigitalOcean apart is its approach to cost-effectiveness. Unlike some cloud providers that can overwhelm you with extra fees and complex billing, DigitalOcean keeps things straightforward and transparent. Their pricing is competitive, and they offer flexible billing options, so businesses don’t have to break the bank. Plus, DigitalOcean’s Kubernetes service is fully managed, making it easier for teams to scale their containerized applications without needing a dedicated ops team. Whether it’s for hosting websites, running applications, or powering machine learning models, DigitalOcean provides a reliable cloud solution with a focus on simplicity.

Faits marquants :

  • Simple, cost-effective cloud platform for developers
  • Managed Kubernetes service for easy container orchestration
  • Developer-friendly tools and user interface
  • Transparent and competitive pricing with no hidden fees
  • Scalable infrastructure for web apps, databases, and machine learning

Services :

  • Managed Kubernetes (DOKS)
  • Machines virtuelles (Droplets)
  • Managed databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc.)
  • Cloud storage solutions (Spaces, Block Storage)
  • Networking solutions (Load Balancers, VPC)
  • AI and machine learning infrastructure with GPU-powered environments
  • Developer tools (API, CLI, monitoring)

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : www.digitalocean.com
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/digitalocean
  • Twitter : x.com/digitalocean
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/thedigitalocean
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/DigitalOceanCloudHosting

11. Cloud Foundry

Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform designed to make deploying cloud-native applications a whole lot easier. It’s not about getting bogged down with complex infrastructure setups or having to manually configure every little thing. Instead, it focuses on letting developers push their code and get it running on the cloud with a simple cf push command. Whether you’re using Java, Node, Python, or any other popular language, Cloud Foundry helps you deploy your applications quickly and efficiently. The best part is that you don’t need to worry about managing Kubernetes or Istio; you can just focus on what you’re building.

The platform is highly extensible, thanks to a community-driven ecosystem of buildpacks and services. This makes it a great option for teams who want to stick with their preferred developer tools and frameworks without sacrificing the flexibility of the cloud. It also supports multi-cloud environments, so businesses can deploy and manage apps across different infrastructures. With tools like Korifi, which offers a higher-level abstraction over Kubernetes, Cloud Foundry allows developers to stay productive while ensuring their apps are running smoothly and securely.

Faits marquants :

  • Simplifies cloud-native app deployment with cf push
  • Supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks
  • No need for complex Kubernetes management
  • Community-driven with extensive buildpack and service integrations
  • Multi-cloud deployment capabilities

Services :

  • Cloud-native application deployment and management
  • Integration with Kubernetes through Korifi for a higher-level abstraction
  • Multi-cloud support for deployment across various platforms
  • Developer tools for app lifecycle management
  • Extensive tutorials and community resources for learning

Informations de contact :

  • Website: www.cloudfoundry.org
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/cloud-foundry
  • Twitter: x.com/cloudfoundry

12. Cast AI

Cast AI focuses on taking some of the day-to-day grind out of running Kubernetes. Instead of teams constantly adjusting resources or trying to predict what their clusters will need next week, they use automation to keep everything running efficiently behind the scenes. Their platform watches how workloads behave and shifts things around so applications get the resources they need without piling up unused capacity. It’s basically their way of saying that Kubernetes doesn’t have to feel chaotic if the right guardrails are in place.

Most companies come to Cast AI because juggling performance, cost, and stability on Kubernetes gets tiring fast. Cast AI leans into that reality by handling a lot of the tuning and scaling decisions that normally take hours of DevOps time. They also give teams clearer insight into what’s happening inside their clusters, so people can make adjustments without digging through endless dashboards. The whole setup lets engineering teams focus more on building things and less on babysitting clusters.

Faits marquants :

  • Automates resource allocation and workload tuning inside Kubernetes
  • Keeps clusters stable with automatic scaling and adjustment
  • Helps reduce cloud overspending through smarter resource planning
  • Provides tooling to track how workloads behave over time
  • Designed to simplify Kubernetes operations for smaller and larger teams alike

Services :

  • Automated optimization for Kubernetes clusters
  • Workload rightsizing and scheduling
  • Cost monitoring and usage insights
  • Kubernetes security and compliance tooling
  • Autoscaling for CPU, GPU, and other compute-heavy tasks
  • Integrations with common observability and DevOps tools

Informations de contact :

  • Website: cast.ai
  • Email: hello@cast.ai
  • Address: 111 NE 1st St, Miami, FL 33132, United States
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/cast-ai
  • Twitter: x.com/cast_ai
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/cast.ai.platform

13. Traefik

Traefik is an open-source tool that focuses on simplifying application routing and load balancing, especially in containerized environments like Docker Swarm. It serves as an external reverse proxy that helps direct traffic to the right places, keeping applications running smoothly. By automatically discovering services in a Docker Swarm cluster, it makes managing complex container setups much more manageable. What’s great about Traefik is its ability to update routes dynamically as containers scale up or down. This makes it perfect for environments where services are constantly changing, like microservices applications.

What really sets Traefik apart is its ease of use and automation. It integrates with Kubernetes as well as Docker, so it works across different container orchestration systems. With built-in support for things like TLS termination and automatic Let’s Encrypt certificate management, it ensures that connections are secure without much effort from the team. It’s also highly flexible, so as infrastructure needs change, migrating from Docker Swarm to something like Kubernetes doesn’t require major reconfigurations of your routing setup. Traefik simply adapts, making it a long-term solution for networking needs in containerized environments.

Faits marquants :

  • Simplifies application routing and load balancing for Docker Swarm and Kubernetes
  • Supports automatic service discovery and configuration updates
  • Provides TLS termination and automatic certificate management with Let’s Encrypt
  • Flexible and can easily adapt to different container orchestration systems
  • Great for microservices with dynamic service scaling

Services :

  • Reverse proxy and load balancing for containerized environments
  • Kubernetes and Docker Swarm ingress management
  • API gateway and API management
  • Web application firewall and security features
  • Integration with various cloud providers and technologies
  • Community-driven, open-source platform with extensive documentation

Informations de contact :

  • Website: traefik.io
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/traefik
  • Twitter: x.com/traefik

14. Northflank

Northflank is a platform built around the idea of making it easier for teams to run containers, databases, and all sorts of workloads without wrestling with infrastructure every day. They use Kubernetes under the hood, but they keep most of the complexity out of sight so teams can focus on actually shipping things. Whether a team wants to run AI models, traditional web apps, or quick test environments, they offer a setup that can live on their cloud or inside a company’s own cloud account. It’s flexible in a way that doesn’t feel heavy, which is why people tend to stick with it when they want to avoid dealing with raw Kubernetes.

They also put a lot of effort into the developer experience. Things like spinning up preview environments, linking Git builds, scaling services, and checking logs all sit in one place. And for teams doing more advanced work, like GPU workloads or multi-cloud setups, Northflank doesn’t block them in. It adapts instead of forcing a specific workflow. So even though the platform is packed with features, day-to-day use feels more like a toolkit that quietly handles the annoying parts of running modern apps.

Faits marquants :

  • Streamlines running containers, databases, and AI workloads
  • Keeps Kubernetes complexity hidden behind a cleaner interface
  • Works across multiple clouds or inside a company’s own infrastructure
  • Supports fast development workflows like preview environments and Git-based builds
  • Designed to scale from small projects to large, multi-service platforms

Services :

  • Managed environments for running containers and databases
  • Automated CI/CD pipelines and release workflows
  • GPU-powered workloads for AI models and training
  • Multi-cloud and bring-your-own-cloud deployment options
  • Observability tools for logs, metrics, and environment health
  • Templates and IaC tools for repeatable infrastructure setups

Informations de contact :

  • Site web : northflank.com
  • Email: contact@northflank.com
  • Address: 20-22 Wenlock Road, London, England, N1 7GU
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/northflank
  • Twitter : x.com/northflank

Conclusion

Docker Swarm had its moment, but the ecosystem around container orchestration has grown way past what it can comfortably handle. The good news is that there’s no shortage of tools that pick up where Swarm falls short, each with its own personality and way of solving the same set of headaches. Some lean into automation, others focus on developer experience, and a few try to simplify Kubernetes enough that it stops feeling like a second job.

The real takeaway is that you don’t have to force Swarm to do things it was never built for. Whether you want something lightweight, something hands-off, or something that can scale without drama, there’s an option that fits. The easiest way to figure out what works for your team is to test one or two in a low-risk setup. You’ll know pretty quickly which approach feels natural and which one adds more friction than it solves. In the end, the right choice is the one that lets you spend less time wrestling with infrastructure and more time actually building things.

 

Top K6 Alternatives for Load Testing

Load testing doesn’t have to feel like you’re married to one tool forever. Sometimes the team just needs a different flavor – maybe something that runs anywhere, or lives entirely in code, or leans hard into real browsers. Below we’ve pulled together 11  options that keep popping up when people start looking around for something other than k6. Nothing here is crowned king; they’re just different ways of getting the same job done, each with its own quirks and habits that click better for certain projects or certain brains.

You’ll spot the usual open-source suspects, a couple of cloud platforms that take the heavy lifting off your shoulders, and a few that try to solve the problem from a completely different angle. Think of it like a menu – skim through, see what sounds like it would fit your current mess, and give it a spin. No sales pitch, just the straight rundown.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst comes from a small team that’s trying to solve a problem a lot of engineering groups run into once they get past the “one big monolith” stage: every new service suddenly needs its own VPC, IAM roles, observability setup, and a pile of Terraform that nobody wants to write or review. Instead of making yet another load-testing tool, they went the opposite direction; they built something that quietly spins up the actual production-like environment so you can point real load generators (k6, JMeter, Locust, whatever) at it without begging the infra team for a sandbox first.

In practice that means developers can declare “I need Postgres, Redis, and a public endpoint” and get a ready-to-hit cluster in minutes instead of days. For performance testing it turns out to be handy because the environment is close enough to real production that the numbers you get from k6 actually mean something, and you don’t waste half the sprint fighting cloud permissions just to run a quick ramp-up test.

Faits marquants :

  • Takes a short app manifest and builds full cloud landing zones automatically.
  • Supports AWS, Azure, and GCP with the same declaration file.
  • Wires up logging, metrics, and alerts without extra config.
  • Gives each service its own isolated network and cost tagging.
  • Can be run as SaaS or self-hosted inside your own accounts.
  • Lets any load-testing tool hit production-like targets instantly.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

2. Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter serves as an open-source tool built in Java for checking how applications handle loads and perform tasks. It started out focused on web apps but grew to cover a wider range of testing scenarios, working with both static files and dynamic setups. Teams use it to mimic traffic on servers or networks, pulling apart how things hold up when things get busy. The setup lets you record plans quickly, debug on the fly, and run everything from a command line across various operating systems.

What stands out is its flexibility at the protocol level, meaning it interacts directly without mimicking full browser actions like running scripts in pages. This keeps things straightforward for core checks, though it skips the visual side of rendering. Extensions come easy through plugins and scripting options, allowing tweaks for specific needs without starting from scratch every time.

Faits marquants :

  • Supports testing across protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, FTP, JDBC, LDAP, JMS, SMTP, TCP, and more.
  • Includes a test IDE for recording, building, and debugging plans.
  • Runs in CLI mode for headless operation on Linux, Windows, or Mac.
  • Generates dynamic HTML reports for results.
  • Handles correlation by extracting data from formats like HTML, JSON, or XML.
  • Offers full multi-threading for concurrent sampling.
  • Provides caching and offline analysis of test outcomes.
  • Extensible with pluggable samplers, scriptable options in Groovy or BeanShell, and data visualization plugins.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : jmeter.apache.org
  • Twitter : x.com/ApacheJMeter

3. Gatling

Gatling operates as a load testing platform that handles simulations for various application types, from web setups to APIs and cloud environments. It accommodates different creation methods, whether through code in languages like Java or JavaScript, or simpler no-code approaches, and pulls in elements from tools like Postman. The platform ties into development flows by linking with CI/CD pipelines, allowing automated runs and management of resources in a shared space.

Collaboration features let groups handle scripts, executions, and reports together, while infrastructure options support scaling across locations or private setups. Analysis tools track metrics and trends, feeding into broader observability systems. It’s geared toward ongoing integration, with options for dashboards that compare results over time and adjust based on feedback loops.

Faits marquants :

  • Works with web applications, APIs, microservices, cloud setups, and AI models.
  • Allows test creation via code, no-code, or imports from Postman.
  • Integrates into CI/CD for automated performance checks.
  • Supports team collaboration on scripts, runs, and reports.
  • Manages global or private infrastructure for virtual user generation.
  • Provides customizable dashboards for metrics and trends.
  • Includes CLI and API triggers for orchestration.
  • Handles data from observability stacks for deeper insights.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Website: gatling.io
  • Twitter: x.com/GatlingTool
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/gatling

4. Locust

Locust functions as an open-source load testing tool where behaviors get defined straight in Python code, skipping interfaces or complex files for a more direct approach. It scales by distributing tests across machines, handling large user simulations without much overhead. The code-based setup makes it simple to outline tasks like logins or page loads, with waits built in to match real patterns.

Running tests happens through a basic command, and it supports parsing elements like HTML in scenarios. While it’s strong on HTTP, extensions cover other areas, and the distributed nature helps with bigger loads. Community input keeps it evolving, with options for hosted versions that add reporting layers.

Faits marquants :

  • Defines user behaviors and tasks using Python code.
  • Supports distributed testing over multiple machines for scalability.
  • Includes wait times between tasks to simulate realistic patterns.
  • Handles HTTP requests with options for login simulations and asset loads.
  • Allows HTML parsing and nested task structures.
  • Runs via command line for straightforward execution.
  • Integrates with cloud-hosted options for detailed reporting.
  • Draws from a wide contributor base for ongoing tweaks.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : locust.io
  • Twitter : x.com/locustio

5. BlazeMeter

BlazeMeter runs as a cloud platform that teams use for different kinds of testing, from performance checks to functional runs and API work. It builds on top of open tools like JMeter but adds a managed layer so people can run bigger tests without handling the infrastructure themselves. The setup also covers service virtualization and test data creation, which helps when real dependencies are hard to reach during early stages.

A lot of the workflow happens through a shared interface where scripts get uploaded, tests get scheduled, and results show up in one spot. It ties into CI/CD pipelines the way many teams already work, and the platform handles scaling the load across cloud regions when needed.

Faits marquants :

  • Supports JMeter scripts directly in a cloud environment.
  • Includes performance, functional, API testing, and monitoring options.
  • Offers service virtualization for simulating missing services.
  • Provides AI-driven test data generation.
  • Works with Jenkins and other common CI/CD tools.
  • Runs tests from multiple geographic locations.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.blazemeter.com
  • E-mail: info@perforce.com
  • Twitter : x.com/perforce
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/perforce
  • Adresse : 400 First Avenue North #400 Minneapolis, MN 55401
  • Téléphone : +1 612.517.2100

6. LoadView

LoadView offers a cloud-based way to run load tests inside actual browsers instead of just hitting protocols. Teams point and click to record user flows or upload scripts, then the platform spins up connections from various spots around the world using AWS and Azure under the hood. It handles websites, web apps with multiple steps, and straight API calls without needing to manage any servers on your end.

The whole thing stays managed, so once the scenario is set, the heavy lifting of generating traffic happens elsewhere. Different load curves let you ramp up slowly, hit a target and hold, or adjust on the fly while watching how the application reacts in real time.

Faits marquants :

  • Executes tests in real browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and mobile ones.
  • Records scripts with point-and-click instead of coding everything.
  • Supports HTTP/S, REST, SOAP, and multi-step web app flows.
  • Offers load step, goal-based, and dynamic adjustable curves.
  • Generates load from over 40 locations using managed cloud.
  • Includes Postman collection import for API scenarios.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.loadview-testing.com
  • Courriel : sales@loadview-testing.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/dotcommonitor
  • Twitter : x.com/loadviewtesting
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/dotcom-monitor
  • Adresse : 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite #820 Excelsior, MN 55331 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite #820 Excelsior, MN 55331
  • Téléphone : 1-888-479-0741

7. Artillery

Artillery started as a straightforward Node.js tool for scripting load tests in code, but it has grown into a full platform that now mixes HTTP checks with Playwright-based browser testing and upcoming monitoring features. Engineers write scenarios in YAML or JavaScript, reuse existing Playwright tests for load, and run everything either locally, in their own cloud accounts, or through a managed service.

The newer parts focus on making big Playwright suites run faster by splitting them automatically and collecting proper web vitals alongside the usual metrics. It fits teams who already lean on code for testing and want the same approach when checking how things hold up under real traffic.

Faits marquants :

  • Supports HTTP, WebSocket, GraphQL, and Playwright browser scenarios.
  • Reuses Playwright E2E tests directly for load generation.
  • Runs distributed tests from personal AWS/Azure or managed cloud.
  • Includes built-in OpenTelemetry tracing and GitHub integration.
  • Provides dashboards, AI summaries for failures, and cost tracking.
  • Handles large-scale sharding for Playwright suites.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.artillery.io
  • E-mail: support@artillery.io
  • Twitter : x.com/artilleryio

8. WebLOAD

WebLOAD comes from RadView as a load testing tool that people have used since the early nineties for checking how applications hold up under traffic. It works on-premises, in the cloud, or a mix of both, and the scripting side leans on a correlation engine that grabs dynamic values like session IDs on its own. Teams can still drop in JavaScript when they need extra logic, and it handles regular web protocols plus things like WebSockets without much fuss.

The analytics part shows data while tests run, with a dashboard that sits in a browser and some AI touches for spotting patterns quicker. Overall it follows the usual flow – record or build scripts, throw load from wherever, then dig through reports to figure out what broke or slowed down.

Faits marquants :

  • Automatic correlation for dynamic values in scripts.
  • Supports JavaScript extensions inside test scenarios.
  • Runs from cloud, on-prem, or hybrid setups.
  • Collects server-side metrics during execution.
  • Browser-based dashboard with real-time views.
  • Includes AI-powered insights in the analysis section.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Website: www.radview.com/webload
  • E-mail: sales@radview.com
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/RadviewSoftware
  • Twitter: x.com/RadViewSoftware
  • LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/company/radview-software
  • Address: 991 Highway 22 West, Suite 200 Bridgewater, NJ 08807
  • Phone: +19085267756

9. ReadyAPI 

ReadyAPI bundles several testing pieces under the SmartBear umbrella, pulling together functional API checks, contract testing, and load work into one on-premise platform. The load side used to live under LoadNinja and focuses on running performance scripts through real browsers instead of just protocol calls. Teams either record user flows or write them out, then fire them off against the application to see how the front-end behaves when a crowd shows up.

It fits alongside the rest of SmartBear’s tools like TestComplete or Swagger stuff, so if a group already uses those, spinning up load tests stays in the same ecosystem. Nothing too wild – just a solid way to mix API-level and UI-level load work without jumping between completely separate products.

Faits marquants :

  • Combines functional, contract, and load testing in one platform.
  • Runs load tests using actual browsers for UI scenarios.
  • Ties into other SmartBear tools like Swagger and TestComplete.
  • Supports recording or scripting of user flows.
  • Handles API protocols alongside browser-based traffic.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Website: smartbear.com/product/ready-api
  • Courriel : info@smartbear.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/smartbear
  • Twitter : x.com/smartbear
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/smartbear
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/smartbear_software
  • Adresse : SmartBear Software 450 Artisan Way Somerville, MA 02145
  • Téléphone : +1 617-684-2600

10. PFLB

PFLB runs a cloud platform that teams use when they want to throw load at web apps or APIs without building their own generator fleet. It leans hard on JMeter under the hood, so people can drop in existing scripts or pull stuff straight from Postman collections and get it running across a bunch of regions. The interface stays pretty straightforward – pick a profile, set the numbers, and let it go.

What sets it apart a bit is the AI layer that chews through results afterward and spits out plain-English summaries instead of just graphs. It also hooks into CI/CD pipelines through an API if you want the tests to fire off automatically on every push.

Faits marquants :

  • Executes JMeter scripts in a managed cloud environment.
  • Imports Postman and Insomnia collections for quick setup.
  • Generates load from multiple global locations.
  • Includes AI-driven summaries of test results.
  • Offers trending and comparison views across runs.
  • Supports gRPC and Kafka testing alongside regular HTTP.
  • Provides REST API for pipeline integration.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : pflb.us
  • E-mail: sales@pflb.us
  • Twitter : x.com/pflb22
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/pflb
  • Adresse : 2810 N Church St, PMB 729811, Wilmington, Delaware 19802-4447, États-Unis
  • Téléphone : +14084182552

11. OpenText LoadRunner 

LoadRunner has been around forever in the enterprise testing space and now lives under the OpenText umbrella in a few flavors – cloud version, on-prem enterprise, and the classic professional edition. Most teams pick it when they need something that handles huge distributed tests with thousands of virtual users and still gives detailed protocol-level control. It covers everything from plain HTTP to heavy enterprise protocols that hardly anything else touches.

The scripting side still feels very point-and-click with a thick desktop client, though you can drop in custom code when the built-in blocks aren’t enough. Reports come out detailed and the whole thing integrates with the rest of the OpenText DevOps lineup if you’re already stuck in that ecosystem.

Faits marquants :

  • Supports deep protocol coverage beyond basic web traffic.
  • Offers cloud-based, on-prem, and hybrid deployment options.
  • Includes TruClient for real-browser testing scenarios.
  • Handles large-scale distributed testing across locations.
  • Provides detailed correlation and parameterization tools.
  • Ties into service virtualization for missing components.
  • Works with CI/CD systems through plugins.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.opentext.com
  • Courriel : partners@opentext.com
  • Twitter : x.com/OpenText
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/opentext
  • Phone: +800-4996-5440

Wrapping things up

Wrapping things up, there’s no single tool out there that just slides in and does everything k6 does exactly the same way, only better. What you end up with is a bunch of different flavors, each giving up something to gain something else. Some lean hard into pure code and zero UI, others keep the old-school drag-and-drop recorder because half the team still swears by it, a few go all-in on real browsers at scale, and then you’ve got the ones that try to solve the “I can’t even get a realistic environment to point my tests at” problem first.

Pick whichever trade-off annoys you the least. Run the same basic script in two or three of them one afternoon when nobody’s looking, stare at the reports, and ask the room “does this feel painful or does it feel fine?” The one that gets the fewest groans usually wins. That’s pretty much the whole decision process once you strip away the marketing slides. Good luck, and may your response times stay low and your on-call nights stay quiet.

 

Best Netdata Alternatives People Actually Use in 2026

Netdata is great when you want something lightweight that just works out of the box, but eventually a lot of teams hit limits – scaling, deeper integrations, better alerting, or simply prettier graphs. Below are 14 tools that regularly show up when folks look for the next step. Some are massive all-in-one platforms, some are hyper-focused, and a few are pure visualization layers. Pick whichever matches the gap you’re feeling.

1. AppFirst

AppFirst is a newer platform that tries to let developers deploy applications without having to write any Terraform or cloud-specific code themselves. You basically tell it what your app needs – CPU, database, networking, container image – and it spins up the underlying infrastructure across AWS, Azure, or GCP with all the security defaults already applied.

It’s aimed at teams that want developers to own the full lifecycle of their service but don’t want them spending days learning VPC layouts or writing IAM policies. The idea is that the platform handles the repeatable infra bits so engineers can stay focused on the actual product code.

Faits marquants :

  • Provisions full application environments from simple declarations
  • Fonctionne avec les principaux fournisseurs de services en nuage
  • Applies security and compliance settings automatically
  • Provides built-in logging, monitoring, and cost tracking
  • Options de déploiement SaaS ou auto-hébergé

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

zabbix

2. Zabbix

Zabbix serves as an open-source observability solution designed for monitoring IT and OT environments, including cloud infrastructure, networks, services, and IoT devices. It provides a unified view of systems through a single pane of glass, enabling integration with existing infrastructure components. Deployable on-premise or in the cloud, it supports monitoring across data centers, edge devices, and hybrid setups.

The solution focuses on collecting and processing data for visibility into performance and availability, with capabilities for automated discovery and real-time tracking. It emphasizes scalability and stability to maintain operational efficiency in diverse environments.

Faits marquants :

  • Open-source with no licensing fees or per-device charges.
  • Supports on-premise deployment for full control and data privacy.
  • Offers integrations with existing systems for comprehensive monitoring.
  • Provides 24/7 support through a global partner network.
  • Enables multitenant operations suitable for managed service providers.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.zabbix.com
  • Courriel : sales@zabbix.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/zabbix
  • Twitter : x.com/zabbix
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/zabbix
  • Adresse : 211 E 43rd Street, Suite 7-100, New York, NY 10017, USA
  • Téléphone : +18774922249

prométhée

3. Prométhée

Prometheus is an open-source monitoring system and time series database that utilizes a dimensional data model to identify time series through metric names and key-value pairs. It features the PromQL query language, which enables querying, correlating, and transforming time series data for purposes such as visualizations and alerts. Alerting rules, defined using PromQL and leveraging the dimensional model, are managed by a separate Alertmanager component for notifications and silencing. The system operates with independent servers that rely on local storage, and its binaries, developed in Go, facilitate deployment across environments.

This setup allows for handling metrics from applications and services in a way that’s geared toward cloud-native setups, though it keeps things modular enough for other contexts. It’s all about pulling in data reliably and making it queryable without too much overhead.

Faits marquants :

  • Flexible dimensional data model for time series identification via metric names and key-value pairs.
  • PromQL query language for querying, correlating, and transforming time series data.
  • Alerting rules based on PromQL, with Alertmanager handling notifications and silencing.
  • Independent servers using local storage, with statically linked Go binaries for deployment.
  • Instrumentation libraries and integrations for extracting metrics from systems.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : prometheus.io
  • E-mail: prometheus.io
  • App Store: apps.apple.com/ru/app/prometheus-metrics-reader/id6448750573

4. Grafana IRM

Grafana is an open and composable observability platform that enables users to query, visualize, and alert on data from various sources. It supports monitoring of applications, infrastructure, and other systems through dashboards and pre-built solutions. Grafana integrates with telemetry data such as metrics, logs, traces, and profiles, allowing for the creation of visualizations and alerts based on data from multiple backends.

What stands out is how it acts as a front-end layer, connecting dots between different tools rather than trying to do everything itself. You end up with customizable views that make sense of mixed data sources, which can feel less chaotic when you’re juggling multiple systems.

Faits marquants :

  • Grafana provides visualization capabilities for data from various sources, including support for logs, metrics, traces, and profiles.
  • It offers monitoring solutions for applications, infrastructure, and specific technologies like Kubernetes and databases.
  • Grafana includes alerting features that trigger notifications from any connected data source.
  • The platform supports plugins to connect with additional data sources, applications, and tools.
  • Grafana facilitates incident response management with workflows for on-call management and incident handling.

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : grafana.com
  • Courriel : info@grafana.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/grafana
  • Twitter : x.com/grafana
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/grafana-labs
  • App Store: apps.apple.com/ru/app/grafana-irm
  • Google Play: play.google.com/store/Grafana

5. Checkmk

Checkmk started out as a fork of Nagios years back but has grown into its own thing with a much faster core and way less manual hassle. People use it when they want to watch everything from physical servers to cloud instances and containers without writing a ton of custom scripts. The system automatically finds new devices, figures out what services are running, and applies the right checks, so you’re not stuck clicking through menus all day to add a single host.

A lot of teams like that it has a proper open-source edition you can run forever without paying, but also paid versions that add things like distributed monitoring sites or tighter cloud integrations. If you enjoy tweaking plug-ins or writing your own, the platform doesn’t fight you – everything is scriptable and the API is decent.

Faits marquants :

  • Automatic host discovery and service configuration
  • Raw edition is completely open-source and free
  • Paid editions for distributed setups and cloud workloads
  • REST API for automation and custom integrations

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : checkmk.com
  • Courriel : sales@checkmk.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/checkmk
  • Twitter : x.com/checkmk
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/checkmk
  • Google Play: play.google.com/store/Checkmk
  • Adresse : Checkmk GmbH Kellerstraße 27 81667 Munich Allemagne
  • Téléphone : +44 20 3966 1150

6. Datadog

Datadog is one of those tools that shows up everywhere once companies start living in the cloud. You drop a small agent on your boxes (or skip it entirely for serverless), and suddenly you’ve got metrics, traces, and logs flowing into one place. The dashboards are clean, and the tagging system makes it easy to slice data however you want – by team, environment, customer, whatever.

It leans hard into modern stacks: Kubernetes, Docker, AWS Lambda, all the usual suspects. If you’re already paying for a cloud bill the size of a car payment, Datadog feels pretty natural because it speaks the same language as the rest of your infrastructure.

Faits marquants :

  • Single agent collects metrics, traces, and logs
  • Strong Kubernetes and serverless coverage out of the box
  • Tagging and filtering system for organizing big environments
  • Real-time security monitoring alongside performance data
  • Hundreds of turnkey integrations with cloud services

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.datadoghq.com
  • Courriel : info@datadoghq.com
  • Twitter : x.com/datadoghq
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/datadog
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/datadoghq
  • App Store: apps.apple.com/us/app/datadog
  • Google Play : play.google.com/store/apps/datadog.app
  • Adresse : 620 8th Ave 45th Floor New York, NY 10018 USA
  • Téléphone : 866 329-4466

7. New Relic

New Relic has been around long enough that half the internet probably still has their Java agent installed somewhere. These days it’s trying to be the one dashboard that covers hosts, containers, applications, and even the browser side of things. You get metrics, distributed tracing, error tracking, and logs without juggling five different tools.

Teams that already have a mix of old-school servers and newer cloud-native apps seem to land here a lot. The pricing is usage-based, so you only pay for what actually sends data, which keeps the finance people from having a heart attack when traffic spikes.

Faits marquants :

  • Full-stack view from infrastructure to browser
  • Distributed tracing across services
  • Usage-based pricing with a generous free tier
  • Built-in anomaly detection and alerting
  • Mobile and browser performance monitoring included

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : newrelic.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/NewRelic
  • Twitter : x.com/newrelic
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/new-relic-inc-
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/newrelic
  • App Store: apps.apple.com/ru/app/new-relic
  • Google Play: play.google.com/store/newrelic
  • Adresse : 1100 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 2000, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA
  • Phone: (585) 632-6563

8. Dynatrace

Dynatrace runs as a single-agent platform that watches everything from infrastructure and applications to user sessions and security signals. It pulls in metrics, traces, logs, and events, then tries to connect the dots automatically so people spend less time figuring out why something broke. The system leans on its own AI engine to spot patterns and suggest what might be wrong before alerts flood in.

A lot of bigger teams pick it when they want one tool that covers the whole stack without stitching together separate products. You install the agent, point it at your clusters or hosts, and it starts mapping dependencies on its own.

Faits marquants :

  • Single agent for full-stack data collection
  • Automatic dependency mapping across services
  • Built-in AI for anomaly detection and root cause suggestions
  • Covers applications, infrastructure, logs, and user experience
  • Supports cloud-native and traditional environments

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.dynatrace.com
  • Courriel : sales@dynatrace.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/Dynatrace
  • Twitter : x.com/Dynatrace
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/dynatrace
  • Instagram : www.instagram.com/dynatrace
  • App Store: apps.apple.com/ru/app/dynatrace-4-0
  • Google Play: play.google.com/store/Dynatrace
  • Adresse : 280 Congress Street, 11e étage Boston, MA 02210 États-Unis d'Amérique
  • Phone: 18888333652

9. Icinga

Icinga came out of the old Nagios world but cleaned up a lot of the rough edges and added its own web interface and configuration tools. People still use it for classic server and network checks, but it also handles Kubernetes and cloud stuff without too much extra work. The setup stays pretty flexible – you can keep everything in text files or use the Director module if you prefer a GUI.

It’s one of those tools that never really went away because a ton of sysadmins already know how it works, and the community keeps the plug-ins coming. If you’re comfortable with check scripts and a bit of command-line work, it just keeps running.

Faits marquants :

  • Classic host and service checking with plug-ins
  • Web interface and configuration database option
  • Supports distributed setups with multiple zones
  • Handles servers, networks, and containers
  • Fully open-source core

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : icinga.com
  • Courriel : info@icinga.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/icinga
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/icinga
  • Address: Icinga GmbH Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 90429 Nuremberg, Germany
  • Téléphone : +49 911 9288555 +49 911 9288555

10. OpenNMS

OpenNMS has been around forever as a pure network-focused monitoring system that grew into something bigger. It started with polling devices via SNMP but now does flow analysis, event correlation, and even some application-layer checks. The whole thing stays completely open-source, and the company behind it makes money on support subscriptions for the stable Meridian releases.

Teams that manage large or distributed networks seem to end up here a lot because it scales out horizontally and doesn’t choke on thousands of interfaces. You drop it in, let it discover your network, and it starts graphing whatever it finds.

Faits marquants :

  • Strong SNMP polling and flow collection
  • Event-driven architecture with correlation rules
  • Distributed minion setup for large environments
  • Built-in traffic analysis tools
  • 100 % open-source with optional paid support

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : www.opennms.com
  • Courriel : contactus@opennms.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/OpenNMS
  • Twitter : x.com/opennms
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/the-opennms-group
  • Adresse : 2871 Lake Vista Drive Lewisville, TX 75067
  • Téléphone : +1 919-533-0160

11. SigNoz

SigNoz shows up as a newer open-source tool that tries to keep logs, metrics, and traces in one place instead of running separate systems. Teams that already use OpenTelemetry tend to give it a look because it speaks that language natively and stores everything in ClickHouse, which handles big volumes without complaining too much. You can run it yourself on a few servers or let them host it if you don’t want the ops overhead.

Most people who switch to it seem to come from the paid big-name platforms and just want something they can actually control and extend without getting surprise invoices. It’s still growing, but the basics are there – dashboards, alerts, exception tracking, the usual stuff you expect once you’re past toy projects.

Faits marquants :

  • Built around OpenTelemetry for logs, traces, and metrics
  • Uses ClickHouse as the backend storage
  • Self-host or managed cloud options
  • Single UI for all signals with correlation between them
  • No pricing tied to users or hosts

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : signoz.io
  • Twitter : x.com/SigNozHQ
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/signozio

12. Cacti

Cacti has been the go-to graphing tool for anyone who lives in SNMP land since forever. You point it at switches, routers, servers, whatever speaks SNMP, and it starts drawing pretty round-robin graphs using RRDTool underneath. The interface looks like it hasn’t changed much in fifteen years, and that’s actually fine for a lot of network folks who just want reliable long-term graphs without drama.

People still run it because it does one thing really well and doesn’t try to be everything to everyone. If your job is keeping an eye on interface counters and bandwidth trends across a campus or data center, Cacti still gets dropped into new setups more often than you’d think.

Faits marquants :

  • Classic SNMP polling and RRDTool graphing
  • Template system for devices and graphs
  • Plugin architecture to add extra features
  • Role-based user management
  • Works on everything from small LANs to large networks

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Website: www.cacti.net

13. LibreNMS

LibreNMS grew out of the old Observium fork and turned into its own thing with a cleaner look and more community-driven development. It auto-discovers your network using the usual protocols, builds maps, tracks ports, and throws alerts when something goes down or gets weird. The web UI feels modern enough that you don’t cringe when you open it on a phone.

A decent chunk of ISPs and companies with big layer-2/3 setups still swear by it because it just works and doesn’t cost anything unless you want official support. You install it, let it scan, and suddenly you can see which customer is hammering the link at 3 a.m.

Faits marquants :

  • Automatic discovery via SNMP, CDP, LLDP, OSPF, BGP
  • Bandwidth billing based on port usage
  • Distributed polling for larger networks
  • Integrations with Oxidized, RANCID, and other tools
  • Full REST API for scripting

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Website: www.librenms.org
  • Facebook: www.facebook.com/LibreNMS
  • Twitter: x.com/LibreNMS

14. Pandora FMS

Pandora FMS handles a pretty wide range of monitoring tasks from one console – networks, servers, applications, logs, even some user-experience checks and remote control features. Teams that want to keep an eye on both old-school hardware and newer cloud stuff without switching between five different tools sometimes land on it. The agent works on pretty much every operating system you can think of, and they also have an enterprise version if you need official support or extra modules.

It’s one of those platforms that started years ago and just kept adding pieces over time, so you end up with things like inventory, ticketing, and satellite servers for remote sites all in the same package. Some places run the open-source community edition, others pay for the full thing with the fancy reporting and 24/7 help.

Faits marquants :

  • Covers networks, servers, applications, and log collection
  • Agent supports Windows, Linux, Unix, mainframes, and more
  • Includes remote control and inventory features
  • Satellite servers for monitoring remote locations
  • Open-source community version and paid enterprise releases

Contact et informations sur les médias sociaux :

  • Site web : pandorafms.com
  • Facebook : www.facebook.com/pandorafms
  • Twitter : x.com/pandorafms
  • LinkedIn : www.linkedin.com/company/pandora-pfms
  • App Store: apps.apple.com/ru/app/pandora-fms
  • Google Play: play.google.com/store/apps/pandorafmsmobile
  • Address: C/ José Echegaray 8, Alvia, Edificio I, planta 2, Oficina 12. 28232 Las Rozas de Madrid, Madrid, España
  • Téléphone : +34 91 559 72 22 +34 91 559 72 22

Pour conclure

At the end of the day, there’s no single winner that magically fits every team. Netdata nails that instant, no-fuss view of one machine, but the second you have more than a handful of boxes, or you need real alerting, retention that doesn’t eat your disk alive, or dashboards that don’t make your eyes bleed, you’re shopping for something else.

Some people go for the big all-in-one platforms because they’re tired of running five different tools and just want everything in one place. Others stick to the lightweight metrics collector plus a separate visualization layer because that combo scales exactly how they need it in container land. Then there’s the crowd that finally throws in the towel and picks one of the paid SaaS options because getting paged at midnight stops being fun real quick.

Truth is, a ridiculous number of setups I’ve seen are actually hybrids maybe one of these for infrastructure, another for traces and logs, and something on top just to make the graphs look decent. And that’s totally fine. Monitoring always ends up a bit messy because your infrastructure is messy.

So grab whichever one fixes the thing that’s annoying you today. You can bolt on or swap out the rest later when the next pain shows up. Just don’t let yourself get stuck chasing the “perfect” stack forever good enough and stable beats theoretically perfect every single time. Your on-call rotation will thank you.

 

Contact Nous
Bureau au Royaume-Uni :
Téléphone :
Suivez-nous :
A-listware est prêt à devenir votre solution stratégique d'externalisation des technologies de l'information.

    Consentement au traitement des données personnelles
    Télécharger le fichier